![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tony roberts wrote:
If it's busy I don't say anything. If I'm out at 2100 hours, and the tower staff are sitting there bored out of their minds, I'll sometimes call, "Kelowna Tower, Cessna 172 Golf India Charlie Echo requesting Mode C check - I have 4200 ft" and they will respond, "India Charlie Echo Altimeter setting is 29.96 - we read 4350ft." Then I know that although I am out, I am still legal. If of course the call India Charlie Echo we read 4550 feet then I know to have my modre C encoder checked before I fly through any serious airspace. I'm surprised that nobody's mentioned the old trick about how to avoid getting busted on an altitude. Upon being questioned about your altitude, you note you're off by 300 feet (or whatever). Announce you're recycling your transponder, turn it off, climb or dive like a banshee, turn it back on a few moments later as you establish yourself where you were supposed to be in the first place. Of course I have no personal experience with this technique as I've been an accurate pilot. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y wrote:
The problem disappeared, and we've since met others who had been told of double returns. We've chalked it up as a since-repaired FAA radar / computer issue. There's a spot I fly over that almost always generates a spurious TIS target. I suspect it's a similar problem. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's a spot I fly over that almost always generates a spurious TIS
target. I suspect it's a similar proble The TIS response may also be the boundry of a sector. Is the spurious response right at your own location? Jose -- There are two kinds of people in the world. Those that just want to know what button to push, and those that want to know what happens when they push the button. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 30, 7:01 pm, buttman wrote:
Does anybody do this? Has a problem like this ever been encountered by anyone else? Is there any other way to check that your transponder is working before you enter airspace? I do it every year after annual (since all the antennas have been messed with). Just call approach/center and ask for a transponder check. -Robert |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes it, reJose wrote:
There's a spot I fly over that almost always generates a spurious TIS target. I suspect it's a similar proble The TIS response may also be the boundry of a sector. Is the spurious response right at your own location? Yes, it reports a target same altitude and location as me. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, it reports a target same altitude and location as me.
Same thing happens to us. I think what you are seeing is the adjacent sector reporting your own airplane as you transition across the boundary. First couple of times does cause the seat to crease though. Jose -- There are two kinds of people in the world. Those that just want to know what button to push, and those that want to know what happens when they push the button. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 6:44 am, B A R R Y wrote:
tony roberts wrote: I sometimes ask for a Mode C check. It checks the encoding altitmeter in addition to general operation. Our plane flies in Bravo/Charlie/IFR enough that we know ours works. However, we went through a spell where we were told by ATC that they were getting double returns from us. Our favorite avionics guy checked it twice with nothing found. The double return would happen in a relatively specific geographical area. We would often get asked if we had multiple transponders in the aircraft. The problem disappeared, and we've since met others who had been told of double returns. We've chalked it up as a since-repaired FAA radar / computer issue. I'd simply ask ATC for checks, as Tony mentioned. There is a great article on the web (I'll try and track it down) about how this happens in radar facilities with multiple radars feeding the presentation the controller is seeing. Memphis Center "use" to have the problem just north of Dyersburg, it was the most notorious in the country I was told...and it took some effort to fix it. It has to do when the computer that is processing all of this gets "confused" because of the time and angle of how the returns from the various radar sites are coming to it. Robert |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"buttman" wrote in message
ups.com... ident light was not blinking, but some of these planes have a real dim ident light and the sun was behind us. Also, we were at about 3000 feet and just south of Modesto. I don't think radar coverage was the issue. Remember that the light should respond to calls made from other TCAS-equipped aircraft. If you think there should have been sufficient airline traffic ovehead to trigger the light, you might want to check the transponder. I just upgraded to a solid state transponder after years of troubleshooting intermittent problems in my KT-76A (including bench checks, antenna cleaning, mode-c replacements) and the transition to solid state seemed to have fixed the problem. To answer the original post, during all this time, I called various ATC facilities to check my mode C with no pushback from them. Marco |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
working for flying | JA_MORAN | Piloting | 3 | March 28th 07 12:31 AM |
Metal working... | Blueskies | Home Built | 4 | February 25th 04 02:40 AM |
How is IFF working? | Tobias Endrullis | Military Aviation | 8 | November 30th 03 03:06 PM |
Looking for ATC working in LAX/ORD/NYC Tracon | Marc | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | July 11th 03 01:30 PM |
Looking for ATC working in LAX/ORD/NYC Tracon | Marc | Piloting | 0 | July 11th 03 01:30 PM |