![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray Andraka wrote:
Some of the old Loran boxes had it, so why can't it be done in a modern GPS that has everything else down to the color of your shoelaces in it? GNS480 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:56:59 -0000, "Robert M. Gary"
wrote: On Jul 12, 6:09 am, Nathan Young wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:36:05 -0700, wrote: Oshkosh seems to be the place where Garmin rolls out their latest and greatest products. Any speculation on what the next will be? From a software standpoint, there are probably lots of little features that can be improved, but I cannot think of any big features that the 496 lacks... Airways. Until they put airways in the GPS systems they will still be just help tools. This is the same with the G1000. I still have to carry all my charts and reference them often in flight. There is hope. They have airways in the Mustang G1000 and ChartView in the entire 2007 NAV III line and rumor has it the new software (reportedly coming this month) for the rest of the NAV III line has airways and chartview as well. AFAIK you still need to carry the charts though. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 12, 3:55 pm, Peter Clark
wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:56:59 -0000, "Robert M. Gary" wrote: On Jul 12, 6:09 am, Nathan Young wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:36:05 -0700, wrote: Oshkosh seems to be the place where Garmin rolls out their latest and greatest products. Any speculation on what the next will be? From a software standpoint, there are probably lots of little features that can be improved, but I cannot think of any big features that the 496 lacks... Airways. Until they put airways in the GPS systems they will still be just help tools. This is the same with the G1000. I still have to carry all my charts and reference them often in flight. There is hope. They have airways in the Mustang G1000 and ChartView in the entire 2007 NAV III line and rumor has it the new software (reportedly coming this month) for the rest of the NAV III line has airways and chartview as well. Awesome!! AFAIK you still need to carry the charts though. Sure, but carrying and having to frequently reference are different things. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:56:59 -0000, "Robert M. Gary"
wrote: Airways. Until they put airways in the GPS systems they will still be just help tools. This is the same with the G1000. I still have to carry all my charts and reference them often in flight. Excellent point, I had forgotten about airways. I have been flying with a Garmin 295 for years, but I also have my own moving map software running on a tablet PC which displays airways and intersections. In Garmin's defense, the airways take up a lot of memory, are slow to draw/paint on the screen, and consume/clutter the display... and that is on a 900MHz Pentium III tablet PC with a 10.4" screen. Airways would be a tough trick on a smaller 3-4" portable GPS screen. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nathan Young wrote:
In Garmin's defense, the airways take up a lot of memory Feh. The FAA distributes the airway database in an extremely verbose text format which is about 10 meg in raw format, but compresses down (with gzip) to a little under a meg. The only data in the file which doesn't already need to be stored anyway (i.e. fix coordinates) is a list of which fixes make up each airway. There's 42k records in the file. If you used a 32-bit pointer for each fix, plus some per-airway information (I count 2240 airways), the whole thing fits into under 200k. This is nothing. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Smith" wrote: In Garmin's defense, the airways take up a lot of memory Feh. The FAA distributes the airway database in an extremely verbose text format which is about 10 meg in raw format, but compresses down (with gzip) to a little under a meg. The only data in the file which doesn't already need to be stored anyway (i.e. fix coordinates) is a list of which fixes make up each airway. There's 42k records in the file. If you used a 32-bit pointer for each fix, plus some per-airway information (I count 2240 airways), the whole thing fits into under 200k. This is nothing. G-D usenet. There's always some smartass who actually knows what he's talking about to come along and spoil the fun! -- Dan "Gut feeling" Intestinologists concur that the human gut does not contain any rational thoughts. What the human gut *is* full of is moderately well known. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-07-12 14:56:59 -0700, "Robert M. Gary" said:
On Jul 12, 6:09 am, Nathan Young wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:36:05 -0700, wrote: Oshkosh seems to be the place where Garmin rolls out their latest and greatest products. Any speculation on what the next will be? From a software standpoint, there are probably lots of little features that can be improved, but I cannot think of any big features that the 496 lacks... Airways. Until they put airways in the GPS systems they will still be just help tools. This is the same with the G1000. I still have to carry all my charts and reference them often in flight. -Robert They already had those in the MX20, which I think is being sold by Garmin now. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:31:55 -0700, C J Campbell
wrote: They already had those in the MX20, which I think is being sold by Garmin now. The GMX200. Nice unit, slightly larger screen and faster processor than the MX20 they built it from. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
On 2007-07-12 14:56:59 -0700, "Robert M. Gary" said: On Jul 12, 6:09 am, Nathan Young wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:36:05 -0700, wrote: Oshkosh seems to be the place where Garmin rolls out their latest and greatest products. Any speculation on what the next will be? From a software standpoint, there are probably lots of little features that can be improved, but I cannot think of any big features that the 496 lacks... Airways. Until they put airways in the GPS systems they will still be just help tools. This is the same with the G1000. I still have to carry all my charts and reference them often in flight. -Robert Cessna also has it in the G1000 in the Mustang. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: On 2007-07-12 14:56:59 -0700, "Robert M. Gary" said: On Jul 12, 6:09 am, Nathan Young wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:36:05 -0700, wrote: Oshkosh seems to be the place where Garmin rolls out their latest and greatest products. Any speculation on what the next will be? From a software standpoint, there are probably lots of little features that can be improved, but I cannot think of any big features that the 496 lacks... Airways. Until they put airways in the GPS systems they will still be just help tools. This is the same with the G1000. I still have to carry all my charts and reference them often in flight. -Robert Cessna also has it in the G1000 in the Mustang. The G1000 had ChartView (coming "soon" to some installations) whcih has the LOW-ENROUTE charts. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
XM Wx Garmin 430/430W with Garmin GDL-69? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | March 5th 07 03:52 AM |
New Garmin? | Jon A | General Aviation | 0 | June 8th 06 04:00 AM |
This is why Garmin 296's street price has been dropping -> Garmin 396 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | July 11th 05 06:39 PM |
A380 unveiling, 1/18/05, Live. | A Guy Called Tyketto | Piloting | 130 | February 1st 05 08:53 PM |
FS garmin 430 | KAPILOT | Aviation Marketplace | 7 | September 2nd 04 07:25 PM |