![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Thomas wrote: J, Thanks for that helpful insight. I will keep it all in mind. Sice I do not have a TIG machine or experience using one, and I do not have much experience using a torch to weld with, would it be kosher to tack the pieces together with a MIG and then have a professional welder finish the process by using a torch? The local pro that I have used in the past for various projects gave me the impression that he would rather weld with his a/o torch than his TIG machine. -- Have a good one! Steve A/O rig will cost as much as a good MIG set, but is a better choice for welding thin wall 4130. On the other hand, it's a lot easier to tack with the MIG since it only takes one hand. But if you are building a steel tube airframe, you are going to need a good torch to weld on a thousand little tabs and such. Either technique will require practice. Richard PS: Thank Barnyard for the link to WinMitre. Very handy little tool there. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard. The basic problem with Mig welders is the inability of the operators to set them up. As delivered, most home style 110 mig boxes are set up to use .035 wire. The idea is to have a box for mild steel, cars trailers shovels etc...... Smaller wire sizes are available and needed for thin wall applications. Use .023 instead of .035. Excuse me slaughtering exactly correct terms here, but the arc intensity is a function of the area of the wire. So heat control in BTU/Min is easier with smaller diameters. That means that the current carrying capacity of the smaller wire is 66% of the .035 and that go's a very long way towards making the job work. For good fusion, the larger wire needs a btu/sec heat rate that in many cases exceeds the base metals "pour point" or the point where id is completely liquid and flows away from the weld. Using smaller wire gets the heat rate more in line with the tubes fusion heat rate. Scott Correa "Richard Lamb" wrote in message ... A/O rig will cost as much as a good MIG set, but is a better choice for welding thin wall 4130. On the other hand, it's a lot easier to tack with the MIG since it only takes one hand. But if you are building a steel tube airframe, you are going to need a good torch to weld on a thousand little tabs and such. Either technique will require practice. Richard PS: Thank Barnyard for the link to WinMitre. Very handy little tool there. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() spektr wrote: Richard. The basic problem with Mig welders is the inability of the operators to set them up. As delivered, most home style 110 mig boxes are set up to use .035 wire. The idea is to have a box for mild steel, cars trailers shovels etc...... Smaller wire sizes are available and needed for thin wall applications. Use .023 instead of .035. Excuse me slaughtering exactly correct terms here, but the arc intensity is a function of the area of the wire. So heat control in BTU/Min is easier with smaller diameters. That means that the current carrying capacity of the smaller wire is 66% of the .035 and that go's a very long way towards making the job work. For good fusion, the larger wire needs a btu/sec heat rate that in many cases exceeds the base metals "pour point" or the point where id is completely liquid and flows away from the weld. Using smaller wire gets the heat rate more in line with the tubes fusion heat rate. Scott Correa Yep. And there in lies the rub, at least according to the old timers. That tiny intensly heated bead can lock in strong stresses. Which suggests post weldeding stress relief (old argument). With a neutral flame... I bought a Hobart 135 to build my shop. Later sold it for more than I paid for it (because it had a new roll of wire on it at the time ![]() for working on the Tailwind. Each has merits. Could probably justify both if you have the pockets. But I prefer the torch for welding thin wall stuff. Richard |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard,
Do you know of a good source for the .023 wire for 4130? Do you use the normal 75/25 mix for the shielding gas? -- Have a good one! Steve www.americanspiritppc.com "spektr" wrote in message ... Richard. The basic problem with Mig welders is the inability of the operators to set them up. As delivered, most home style 110 mig boxes are set up to use .035 wire. The idea is to have a box for mild steel, cars trailers shovels etc...... Smaller wire sizes are available and needed for thin wall applications. Use .023 instead of .035. Excuse me slaughtering exactly correct terms here, but the arc intensity is a function of the area of the wire. So heat control in BTU/Min is easier with smaller diameters. That means that the current carrying capacity of the smaller wire is 66% of the .035 and that go's a very long way towards making the job work. For good fusion, the larger wire needs a btu/sec heat rate that in many cases exceeds the base metals "pour point" or the point where id is completely liquid and flows away from the weld. Using smaller wire gets the heat rate more in line with the tubes fusion heat rate. Scott Correa "Richard Lamb" wrote in message ... A/O rig will cost as much as a good MIG set, but is a better choice for welding thin wall 4130. On the other hand, it's a lot easier to tack with the MIG since it only takes one hand. But if you are building a steel tube airframe, you are going to need a good torch to weld on a thousand little tabs and such. Either technique will require practice. Richard PS: Thank Barnyard for the link to WinMitre. Very handy little tool there. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 14:57:36 GMT, "Steve Thomas"
wrote: J, Thanks for that helpful insight. I will keep it all in mind. Sice I do not have a TIG machine or experience using one, and I do not have much experience using a torch to weld with, would it be kosher to tack the pieces together with a MIG and then have a professional welder finish the process by using a torch? The local pro that I have used in the past for various projects gave me the impression that he would rather weld with his a/o torch than his TIG machine. Steve, you don't need a joint jigger to cut and fit tubes for the fuselage, and gas welding is something you can learn to do, and do well. You'll be glad you learned as you can use the knowledge for many projects. I tried using the joint jigger and ended up sticking it in a corner where it's sat for years now. Why? Because it was a pain in the ass to use and you literally don't need a precision fit when you are welding. Remember, you aren't gluing the joints, you are melting the base metal and adding more with a filler rod. You bridge a LOT this way. In addition, the welded tube fuselage is an inherently strong fuselage. Even if you totally botch the welding, because you weld all the way around the tube, it probably won't matter in your lifetime. All the tubes are interlocked and welded in this manner. There's just no where for any slippage to occur, everything is triangulated. Think about it, aluminum tube fuselages aren't welded, they're fitted together and held in place with riveted gusset plates. Steel tube fuselages are just about the strongest fuselage there is. You can do it yourself, and I think you'll agree that a simple grinding wheel with a round shaped rough wheel is all you need to fit the tubes. Corky Scott PS, you can dress the grinding wheel to the shape you need yourself too. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky,
I made all of my joints like you mentioned for my mild steel frame and it worked great. I can het them pretty darn close fitting just using a hole saw on a drill press and then finishing them off with a 4" grinder. Thanks for the encouragement. ![]() -- Have a good one! Steve www.americanspiritppc.com "Corky Scott" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 14:57:36 GMT, "Steve Thomas" wrote: J, Thanks for that helpful insight. I will keep it all in mind. Sice I do not have a TIG machine or experience using one, and I do not have much experience using a torch to weld with, would it be kosher to tack the pieces together with a MIG and then have a professional welder finish the process by using a torch? The local pro that I have used in the past for various projects gave me the impression that he would rather weld with his a/o torch than his TIG machine. Steve, you don't need a joint jigger to cut and fit tubes for the fuselage, and gas welding is something you can learn to do, and do well. You'll be glad you learned as you can use the knowledge for many projects. I tried using the joint jigger and ended up sticking it in a corner where it's sat for years now. Why? Because it was a pain in the ass to use and you literally don't need a precision fit when you are welding. Remember, you aren't gluing the joints, you are melting the base metal and adding more with a filler rod. You bridge a LOT this way. In addition, the welded tube fuselage is an inherently strong fuselage. Even if you totally botch the welding, because you weld all the way around the tube, it probably won't matter in your lifetime. All the tubes are interlocked and welded in this manner. There's just no where for any slippage to occur, everything is triangulated. Think about it, aluminum tube fuselages aren't welded, they're fitted together and held in place with riveted gusset plates. Steel tube fuselages are just about the strongest fuselage there is. You can do it yourself, and I think you'll agree that a simple grinding wheel with a round shaped rough wheel is all you need to fit the tubes. Corky Scott PS, you can dress the grinding wheel to the shape you need yourself too. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, Maule does it every day.
"Steve Thomas" wrote in message nk.net... Has anyone on this list ever welded a thinwall 4130 frame with a MIG welder? What is a good source of 4130 seamless and welded seam tubing? Thanks, -- Have a good one! Steve www.americanspiritppc.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am just about ready to take the plunge and order in the materials
necessary to duplicate my current airframe out of 4130. Thanks to all of you guys for the tips and sources. I have one more question. What other metals are compatable with 4130 when welding? My problem is in locating any angle in 4130. So far all I have found is seamless tubing and flat stock. My frame currently uses some angle 1"x1" angle. I would like to stay with using angle in these locations if possible. So, now this may sound dumb, but can you weld mild steel or another alloy to 4130 tubing that I can get in angle? Or better yet, do you know of a source for 4130 angle? -- Have a good one! Steve www.americanspiritppc.com "log" wrote in message ... Yes, Maule does it every day. "Steve Thomas" wrote in message nk.net... Has anyone on this list ever welded a thinwall 4130 frame with a MIG welder? What is a good source of 4130 seamless and welded seam tubing? Thanks, -- Have a good one! Steve www.americanspiritppc.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 01:02:50 GMT, "Steve Thomas"
wrote: I am just about ready to take the plunge and order in the materials necessary to duplicate my current airframe out of 4130. Thanks to all of you guys for the tips and sources. I have one more question. What other metals are compatable with 4130 when welding? My problem is in locating any angle in 4130. So far all I have found is seamless tubing and flat stock. My frame currently uses some angle 1"x1" angle. I would like to stay with using angle in these locations if possible. So, now this may sound dumb, but can you weld mild steel or another alloy to 4130 tubing that I can get in angle? Or better yet, do you know of a source for 4130 angle? You can weld 4130 to mild steel. You can weld many other weldable alloys to 4130. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve.
If you want to use 4130 angls, they are available from lots of different places. If you don't like the prices, use plates and weld them up yourself. You can have plate brake bent and slice out what you need. Lots of ways to get it done, don't get locked into mixing stuff like 1018 to 4130 because you are having a tough time thinking it out. Think it out CLEARLY. Go find yourself an EAA chapter and get a hold of one of their Tech Counsellors. They are really nice to work with and usually respond quite favorably to steak and beer. Proper planning of the task ensures trouble free completion. Scott Correa "Steve Thomas" wrote in message nk.net... I am just about ready to take the plunge and order in the materials necessary to duplicate my current airframe out of 4130. Thanks to all of you guys for the tips and sources. I have one more question. What other metals are compatable with 4130 when welding? My problem is in locating any angle in 4130. So far all I have found is seamless tubing and flat stock. My frame currently uses some angle 1"x1" angle. I would like to stay with using angle in these locations if possible. So, now this may sound dumb, but can you weld mild steel or another alloy to 4130 tubing that I can get in angle? Or better yet, do you know of a source for 4130 angle? -- Have a good one! Steve www.americanspiritppc.com "log" wrote in message ... Yes, Maule does it every day. "Steve Thomas" wrote in message nk.net... Has anyone on this list ever welded a thinwall 4130 frame with a MIG welder? What is a good source of 4130 seamless and welded seam tubing? Thanks, -- Have a good one! Steve www.americanspiritppc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|