![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
Fred the Red Shirt wrote: On Oct 4, 4:52 am, Darrel Toepfer wrote: Ron Wanttaja wrote : ... Can "transparent aluminum" be far behind? It's here now. Aluminum Oxide is transparent which is why telescope mirrors which have a very thin layer to minimize defects, have to be realuminized every few years ago. Um, sort of, not quite. Aluminum oxide forms quickly on pure aluminum surfaces, which is a good thing, corrosion-wise; it's very hard, has little effect on reflectivity, and thus makes for a good mirror coating. The thing is, it's not so much something you do, specifically, as something that happens when aluminum is exposed to oxygen. And if you scratch the surface, the scratch gets an immediate re-coat. Not that you'd want to scratch your mirror at all, if you could possibly avoid it. Eventually, though, dust and other sources of wear damage it and the aluminum under it, and you've got to redo the aluminum coating; it's only a few millionths to a few thousandths thick, from glass to air, so it's easy to damage. Fortunately, it's an easy process, and last a *lot* longer than silvering the mirror, even though the silvered mirror, for the first few minutes anyway, is a couple percent better than aluminum. Then corrosion sets in... Could be worse, we could still be using electrum or speculum metal to make mirrors. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 5, 5:26 pm, Steve Hix wrote:
In article . com, Fred the Red Shirt wrote: On Oct 4, 4:52 am, Darrel Toepfer wrote: Ron Wanttaja wrote : ... Can "transparent aluminum" be far behind? It's here now. Aluminum Oxide is transparent which is why telescope mirrors which have a very thin layer to minimize defects, have to be realuminized every few years ago. Um, sort of, not quite. Aluminum oxide forms quickly on pure aluminum surfaces, which is a good thing, corrosion-wise; it's very hard, has little effect on reflectivity, and thus makes for a good mirror coating. The thing is, it's not so much something you do, specifically, as something that happens when aluminum is exposed to oxygen. And if you scratch the surface, the scratch gets an immediate re-coat. Not that you'd want to scratch your mirror at all, if you could possibly avoid it. Eventually, though, dust and other sources of wear damage it and the aluminum under it, and you've got to redo the aluminum coating; it's only a few millionths to a few thousandths thick, from glass to air, so it's easy to damage. Fortunately, it's an easy process, and last a *lot* longer than silvering the mirror, even though the silvered mirror, for the first few minutes anyway, is a couple percent better than aluminum. Obviously you have not seen how a telescope mirror ages over the years. The coating gradually becomes more and more transparent over the years. This happens even if you never clean, and therefor never damage your mirror. It is certainly not due to wear! Clearly (no pun intended) the typical coating is thin enough that as the oxide layer slowly thickens the transparency rises. Were wear alone responsible, the change would be episodic, not gradual, and would not happen at all between cleanings. Could be worse, we could still be using electrum or speculum metal to make mirrors. Yeah. -- FF |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Riley wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:52:18 GMT, Darrel Toepfer wrote: Ron Wanttaja wrote in m: On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:35:43 -0700, Richard Riley wrote: "Research is continuing to look at fatigue, as well as analysis of damage caused by corrosion, hail storms and other weather phenomena, including trucks that collide with aircraft while they’re on the ground." That's really bad weather. When they say, "It's raining cats and dogs," one generally ISN'T thinking CATerpillars and DOGdges. :-) Can "transparent aluminum" be far behind? You're behind the times. Transparent aluminum is commercially available, I have a sample on my desk. It's expensive - $10/sq. in - but more bulletproof than armored glass and half the weight. Google aluminum oxynitride or ALON. Star Trek 4 came out in 1986. The first patent for aluminum oxynitride as transparent aluminum - from Raytheon, patent 4720362 - was filed in 1985 and granted in 1988. Damit Scotty! You know the Prime Directive specifically prohibits passing advanced technology to primitive cultures!! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Riley wrote:
Star Trek 4 came out in 1986. The first patent for aluminum oxynitride as transparent aluminum - from Raytheon, patent 4720362 - was filed in 1985 and granted in 1988. D@rn, but was it formulated on an old Mac with a wired mouse? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Riley wrote:
including trucks that collide with aircraft while they’re on the ground." That's really bad weather. Most common type of structural repair on regional airliners by far is damage from ground vehicles. John |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
aluminum rib, aluminum spar, holes drilled but screws broken off | jls | Home Built | 13 | January 3rd 07 08:06 AM |
Lighter than air... | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 12 | February 27th 06 11:16 PM |
composite using aluminum windowscreen layer | Allan Morrison | Home Built | 4 | January 27th 05 01:19 PM |
Composite & Carbon Fiber | NW_PILOT | Home Built | 11 | September 21st 04 06:21 PM |
If I make it stronger | Jdandy | Home Built | 9 | August 30th 04 08:22 PM |