A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A Sad Accident



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 15th 07, 03:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dale[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default A Sad Accident

In article ,
Ron Natalie wrote:


Even if they had them on, the record of skydivers managing to get out of
a failing jump plane in an emergency isn't too good.


That's probably because the record mostly contains only those incidents
that ended badly.

Been there, done that...lived to tell the tale...from both perspectives.

But as you pointed out in this instance with it being a night ferry
flight most probably didn't have their rigs on.
  #2  
Old October 10th 07, 05:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 684
Default A Sad Accident

Story on icing conditions possibly being behind the crash:

http://www.ktvb.com/news/regional/st...1554abe71.html

  #3  
Old October 10th 07, 08:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default A Sad Accident

writes:

Story on icing conditions possibly being behind the crash:

http://www.ktvb.com/news/regional/st...1554abe71.html

That story reads as if it were written by Cessna's competitors. It makes it
sound as if it's Cessna's fault if someone crashes after flying into icing
conditions. It creates the impression that an airplane that cannot fly
continuously in icing conditions is somehow defective and that the
manufacturer needs to warn pilots about the dangers of the aircraft.

This is very different from the notion of it being a very bad idea for any
pilot to flying into icing conditions, with or without an airplane certified
to enter them (and continuous flight in icing conditions is not the same as
being able to tolerate them briefly).

Someone either wants to direct all blame away from the crew or wants to damage
the reputation of Cessna.
  #4  
Old October 10th 07, 10:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 316
Default A Sad Accident

On 10 Oct, 20:06, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:
Story on icing conditions possibly being behind the crash:


http://www.ktvb.com/news/regional/st...-cessna_proble...


That story reads as if it were written by Cessna's competitors. It makes it
sound as if it's Cessna's fault if someone crashes after flying into icing
conditions. It creates the impression that an airplane that cannot fly
continuously in icing conditions is somehow defective and that the
manufacturer needs to warn pilots about the dangers of the aircraft.

This is very different from the notion of it being a very bad idea for any
pilot to flying into icing conditions, with or without an airplane certified
to enter them (and continuous flight in icing conditions is not the same as
being able to tolerate them briefly).


How would you know fjukkwit?


You don't fly.


Bertie


  #5  
Old October 10th 07, 11:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default A Sad Accident


wrote in message
ups.com...
Story on icing conditions possibly being behind the crash:

http://www.ktvb.com/news/regional/st...1554abe71.html


Isn't 10 onboard a Malabu a bit much, with parachutes for even more weight?
--
Jim in NC


  #6  
Old October 11th 07, 01:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 538
Default A Sad Accident

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:06:09 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...
Story on icing conditions possibly being behind the crash:

http://www.ktvb.com/news/regional/st...1554abe71.html


Isn't 10 onboard a Malabu a bit much, with parachutes for even more weight?


Where did it say it was a Malibu?
  #7  
Old October 11th 07, 05:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default A Sad Accident


"Peter Clark" wrote

Where did it say it was a Malibu?


My bad. I thought I heard that is what it was. It was a Caravan?
--
Jim in NC


  #8  
Old October 11th 07, 02:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dale[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default A Sad Accident

In article ,
"Morgans" wrote:

wrote in message
ups.com...
Story on icing conditions possibly being behind the crash:

http://www.ktvb.com/news/regional/st..._problems.1554
abe71.html


Isn't 10 onboard a Malabu a bit much, with parachutes for even more weight?


Aircraft was a Cessna 208B Caravan. That airplane routinely hauls 18 or
19 jumpers.
  #9  
Old October 11th 07, 09:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 315
Default A Sad Accident

He filed a VFR flight plan, cheating the media out of an opportunity to
blame the crash on the lack of a flight plan, and didn't pop up for an IFR
clearance. White Pass, five miles from the crash site, was reporting 33
degrees F.

Bob Gardner

wrote in message
ups.com...
Story on icing conditions possibly being behind the crash:

http://www.ktvb.com/news/regional/st...1554abe71.html


  #10  
Old October 12th 07, 05:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
C J Campbell[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default A Sad Accident

On 2007-10-09 09:52:32 -0700, RL Anderson said:

Greetings All,

Thought I'd pass on that there has been a horrific crash this past
Sunday (7 Oct). There was a Caravan used for skydiving, with 10 people
aboard, traveling between Star Idaho and Shelton Washington. The
airplane went down in the general vicinity of White Pass, a 4500 foot
mountain pass on US 12, located on the boundary of Yakima and Lewis
Counties, in the South Central Washington Cascade Mountains. According
to local news, no survivors have been found. I am acquainted with
several skydivers and some of the other folks at the aircraft owner,
Skydive Kapowsin. I hope that none of the folks I know are involved.

Here are some links to the story.

http://www.herald-republic.com/page/dis/290013970261411


http://www.herald-republic.com/page/dis/290013901892319


Pass on as you see fit.

Rick


This is a well-known airplane. I know people who have considerable time
in this very plane. It has boots, but it is not certified for known
ice. IIRC, this particular plane does not have prop deice. The boots
are good for about three shots at getting rid of ice. The pilot was
flying VFR just above the freezing level in rainy weather. He was
squawking 1200 and not talking to anyone at the time.

It is probable he was on autopilot. If the plane was icing up, he might
not have noticed the spinning trim wheel attempting to maintain
altitude. By the time he did notice it, it might well have been too
late. Other Caravans have been lost in just this manner.

The icing conditions in these mountains are some of the worst in the
world. The FAA calls it the Great North Cascades Ice Machine. It is
well named. The weather is unpredictable and in passes like White Pass
can change very suddenly. You think you are just motoring along in the
dark at a safe altitude and it is very easy to become complacent. In
fact, I don't know a pilot in the world who, tired, flying on
autopilot, listening to the drone of the engine, etc., is not likely to
lose focus. At night you can fly into a weather system and never know
it. I know several pilots who were surprised to learn that they had
been in clouds for a long time, perhaps hours.

Weather conditions at the time appear to have been nearly perfect for
an icing accident. Of course, that is how the weather is most of the
time there. It is a rotten place to fly single pilot at night.

--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DA 42 accident Karl-Heinz Kuenzel Piloting 86 April 29th 07 09:05 AM
Accident? on 8-27-92 Chris Wells General Aviation 8 January 10th 06 02:15 AM
F6F accident Larry Cauble Naval Aviation 4 October 14th 05 06:19 PM
Accident db? [email protected] Owning 3 July 25th 05 06:22 PM
MU2 accident Big John Piloting 16 April 13th 04 03:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.