LPV only?

Have any WAAS LPV approaches been established for runways that do not already
have an ILS in place? I'm presuming the limiting factor is LPV deployment is
clearing the approach airspace, lighting, runway length rather than drawing the
approach plate...

Does the FAA publish its priorities or a schedule of new/improved approaches?
--
Shiny new 430W

http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/


"Doug Carter" wrote in message
...
| Have any WAAS LPV approaches been established for runways
that do not already
| have an ILS in place? I'm presuming the limiting factor
is LPV deployment is
| clearing the approach airspace, lighting, runway length
rather than drawing the
| approach plate...
|
| Does the FAA publish its priorities or a schedule of
new/improved approaches?
| --
| Shiny new 430W

On 2007-10-31, Jim Macklin p51mustang wrote:
http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/

Thanks... but, kinda like being referred to the public library Is there
actually a specific section on approach publishing schedules?

Since you want the info, and unless you want to hire at a
decent wage, you'll have to do a little research.

Might I suggest, Google's site search feature...
www.faa.gov

www.firstgov.gov

You can also check www.aopa.org www.nbaa.org and your
Congressman's office gets paid to answer questions from
constituents.

BTW, the link I posted IS just what you wanted, you
obviously didn't bother to look at it.



"Doug Carter" wrote in message
...
| On 2007-10-31, Jim Macklin p51mustang wrote:
| http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/
|
| Thanks... but, kinda like being referred to the public
library Is there
| actually a specific section on approach publishing
schedules?

Have any WAAS LPV approaches been established for runways that do not already
have an ILS in place?

Yes. In my neck of the woods, TCY, C83 and HAF come to mind.

Does the FAA publish its priorities or a schedule of new/improved approaches?

I don't know.

Shiny new 430W

Enjoy!

Doug Carter wrote:
Have any WAAS LPV approaches been established for runways that do not already
have an ILS in place? I'm presuming the limiting factor is LPV deployment is
clearing the approach airspace, lighting, runway length rather than drawing the
approach plate...

Does the FAA publish its priorities or a schedule of new/improved approaches?
--
Shiny new 430W

Most LPV IAPs that have been published to date are not to ILS runways.

There are strict airspace issues, similar to an ILS. No course change
at the FAF unlike other RNAV.

Parallel taxiway.

GQS (glideslope qualification surface) a very strict obstacle-free area
inside DA to the runway.

No lighting required for daytime. ALS are optional for reduction in
visibility.

Production plan for all IAPs:

http://avnweb.jccbi.gov/schedule/production

On Oct 31, 1:27 pm, Doug Carter wrote:
Have any WAAS LPV approaches been established for runways that do not already
have an ILS in place? I'm presuming the limiting factor is LPV deployment is
clearing the approach airspace, lighting, runway length rather than drawing the
approach plate...

Does the FAA publish its priorities or a schedule of new/improved approaches?
--


My home airport at MGY has had an LPV for some time. We do not have an
ILS, but we do have a LOC approach.