![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Storey" wrote in message news:Fg6sb.824$6p6.593@okepread03... "Vee-One" wrote Enlisted-ops. HA! I'll never forget the reaming that a SMSGT pro-super gave a A1C who copped an attitude with the SSGT crew chief about the mess they left on a jet post-flight. He went whined to his AC about it, and that Captain tried to raise a fuss, instead of doing the right thing. That type of leadership? Nope, leadership is always about doing the right thing. Ass reaming is a particular enlisted thing, and one I never paid much attention to. I figured they just liked screaming at each other, because they didn't have a developed vocabulary. When I flew heavies, the last man off the jet was the mission commander, and he'd empty the bus if the seat belts weren't in the same position we found them on pre-flight. God help you if he found any FOD (coke cans, wrappers, etc), or grease-pen markings left on your equipment. But this wasn't the kind of stuff that we were paid to do, or excel in. OK, I'll agree that the difference between your paycheck and mine reflect the difference in our job, and in the level of responsibility we were both entrusted with. However, keeping a clean aircraft has nothing to do with rank, but respect for the equipment and people who take care of it. You wouldn't just drop an empty can on your living room floor and think "The wife will get it, that's what she does", would you? I guess that there will always be a difference in the way people think and behave towards one another. I just hope that I don't **** off the next guy too badly with my words...................... Peter |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just be honest, and use phrases that you know will **** the six guys
off who "own" the forum, and who will drag the subject all the way down to "The Nazi's did it" and then you will know the thread is dead. Don't post after the Nazi's are brought up, as this is bad form. "user" wrote OBTW, BUFDRVR, I have been reading in this newsgroup for a few months now, and have just recently decided to get squirrley about posting in here. Is there some kinda rules or FAQ's that I should read that you could point me in the right direction to? Thanks |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BUFDRVR" wrote in message ... In my experience with the Air Force flying 'O's, you guys never set foot on the hangar deck and have no clue who works on your jets. Must be pre-1993 experience. BUFF, I'll have to disagree, but I'll preface this by saying I only worked in 2 units during the great "reorganization circus". I was at Tinker AFB, working AWACS maintenance, when it happened. Administratively, we were reassigned from a single maintenance squadron, to fall under our respective ops squadron. Our orderly room, admin folks, training managers, etc all moved over to the ops building. We, the flightline folks, stayed where we were at, because we located next to the flightline. Never saw the bosses come down to the shop (except the maintenance officer, he stayed where we were). If you went over to the OR and walked into the building in BDU's, EVERYBODY looked down at you. I would have dearly loved to work at a unit where the ops-maintenace merge worked. You don't even work in the same place Then who the hell were all those guys downstairs wearing the BDU's? Some of them were the same crew chiefs that I "just signed the jet from". They came to all our squadron meetings and functions too. Who the hell were they? do you even know who works on your gear? Well, since I spent one year as the Life Support Officer, I was very familar, and since they were (are) in the same squadron with me, I'd have to be a real idiot to not know who they were even if I wasn't LSO. The only contact you have with the enlisted people that work on your jets is the crewchief. And the line speacialists and the bomb loaders and every maintenance personell outside of the back shop guys who were in a differant squadron. Now....as of 1 OCT 2002, they moved the maintenance function(except Life Support) back to its own squadron and out of the Ops squadron, but the people still work in the same offices, its just that they don't come to all the squadron meetings. Nearly everyone recognizes this as a mistake. From my point of view, it's entirely the right thing to do. Again, that's MY view, a 16 year maintainer working E-3's and E-8's. In the Navy snip sarcasm onYeah, the Navy has some great officer-NCO or officer-enlisted relationships sarcasm off I spent a little over one month on the Theodore Roosevelt and was astonished at the adversarial relationships between officers and non-officers. You guys may work and live togather closer than the Air Force, but you certainly don't respect and get along better. you know where the hangar is don't you? Since thats where my squadron was located, yes I do. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" Peter |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Vee-One" wrote
OK, I'll agree that the difference between your paycheck and mine reflect the difference in our job, and in the level of responsibility we were both entrusted with. However, keeping a clean aircraft has nothing to do with rank, but respect for the equipment and people who take care of it. You wouldn't just drop an empty can on your living room floor and think "The wife will get it, that's what she does", would you? No, I was agreeing with you mostly. That there is a personal discipline that must develop. I always had two sets of BDU's and Flight Suits. Those I wore during the 24 hour C-141 ride to the war zone, and those I changed into just before landing. I could care less if you had a spoon or a fork sticking out your flight-suit where a pen or pencil should go, or that your scarf and hat looked like you used it to wipe your ass. No, clean and presentable costs very little, and I like sharp troops, and clean jets. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene, all I can say is your attitude really sucks and that your view of
maintenance types is severely skewed. An ass reaming isn't "a particular enlisted thing" or even "a maintenance thing". I can point my finger directly at certain officers (ops and maintenance alike) who got their own asses reamed out, and even lost jobs, because of their actions. I remember a pilot in a unit I used to be with "lose his wings" after he flew an aircraft home from another location with a known flight control problem. The DO (an ops officer) was waiting on the ramp when the crew landed and ripped into him right then and there. I know of other ops types get chewed out and even lose their job over what they failed to do as well (e.g., not doing enough to correct a problem). When all is said and done, you're just another person in this world destined to die someday just like me and everybody else here. There are plenty of maintenance types who are not only educated, but may even be more educated than you and quite a few other officers. Bottom line is, you've got no class. You could put 100 of yourself together and it still won't add up to enough class to meet the amount of class carried by many other members (regardless of rank or what side of the house they're on) on their own. "Gene Storey" wrote in news:Fg6sb.824$6p6.593@okepread03: "Vee-One" wrote Enlisted-ops. HA! I'll never forget the reaming that a SMSGT pro-super gave a A1C who copped an attitude with the SSGT crew chief about the mess they left on a jet post-flight. He went whined to his AC about it, and that Captain tried to raise a fuss, instead of doing the right thing. That type of leadership? Nope, leadership is always about doing the right thing. Ass reaming is a particular enlisted thing, and one I never paid much attention to. I figured they just liked screaming at each other, because they didn't have a developed vocabulary. When I flew heavies, the last man off the jet was the mission commander, and he'd empty the bus if the seat belts weren't in the same position we found them on pre-flight. God help you if he found any FOD (coke cans, wrappers, etc), or grease-pen markings left on your equipment. But this wasn't the kind of stuff that we were paid to do, or excel in. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gene Storey" wrote:
"user" wrote: OBTW, BUFDRVR, I have been reading in this newsgroup for a few months now, and have just recently decided to get squirrley about posting in here. Is there some kinda rules or FAQ's that I should read that you could point me in the right direction to? Thanks Just be honest, and use phrases that you know will **** the six guys off who "own" the forum, and who will drag the subject all the way down to "The Nazi's did it" and then you will know the thread is dead. Don't post after the Nazi's are brought up, as this is bad form. Hilarious! You forgot to mention that, in addition to the six guys, the one gal who also "owns" the forum. You know, the group's favorite retired aerospace research engineer whose the only person "allowed" to chit chat about Kool Whip, Jello, yummy treats for her dog and her latest warm 'n fuzzy counted cross stitch craft project she ordered from her Lillian Vernon catalog. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Too funny!!!
Noted. On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:48:52 GMT, Mike Marron wrote: "Gene Storey" wrote: "user" wrote: OBTW, BUFDRVR, I have been reading in this newsgroup for a few months now, and have just recently decided to get squirrley about posting in here. Is there some kinda rules or FAQ's that I should read that you could point me in the right direction to? Thanks Just be honest, and use phrases that you know will **** the six guys off who "own" the forum, and who will drag the subject all the way down to "The Nazi's did it" and then you will know the thread is dead. Don't post after the Nazi's are brought up, as this is bad form. Hilarious! You forgot to mention that, in addition to the six guys, the one gal who also "owns" the forum. You know, the group's favorite retired aerospace research engineer whose the only person "allowed" to chit chat about Kool Whip, Jello, yummy treats for her dog and her latest warm 'n fuzzy counted cross stitch craft project she ordered from her Lillian Vernon catalog. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One experience was more recent, 2001 Cope Thunder in Eilsson
(sp?). , where ops and the flight gear clubhouse (complete with lockers and showers) was in a totally seperate building than the hangar and maintenance. Space is always at a premium. Our Life Support shop was located across the street in a seperate building, but there was no room in the squadron building, perhaps the same is true at Eilson? I'm taking it that line specialists, bomb loaders, maintenance, flight gear, and ops are all different squadrons? As of 1 OCT 2002 you are correct, kind of.. There are now Ops Squadrons and Maintenance Squadrons. I'll pleade ignorance on how they've got the maintenance squadrons broken up (crew chiefs in one, hydraulics in another, etc.), however, from 1 OCT 1993 till 1 OCT 2002 we were all (except the back shop guys) in one squadron. This current "break up" is considered a mistake Air Force wide. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just be honest, and use phrases that you know will **** the six guys
off who "own" the forum, and who will drag the subject all the way down to "The Nazi's did it" and then you will know the thread is dead. Don't post after the Nazi's are brought up, as this is bad form. Damn that was good... BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BUFF, I'll have to disagree, but I'll preface this by saying I only worked
in 2 units during the great "reorganization circus". I only worked in two as well, but it was a success story in each one. We, the flightline folks, stayed where we were at, because we located next to the flightline. In many cases around the Air Force, I'm sure this was true and in a perfect world working in the same building would be the norm, but I don't think its required to make the ops-mnx cooperation successful. Never saw the bosses come down to the shop Failure of leadership, not the system. If you went over to the OR and walked into the building in BDU's, EVERYBODY looked down at you. I'll have to take your word for it, but I find it hard to believe. I thought more highly of our young enlisted folks than I did many of our young officers. From my point of view, it's entirely the right thing to do. Again, that's MY view, a 16 year maintainer working E-3's and E-8's. Obviously you're not alone or the reorganization would not have taken place. I've been at the Pentagon since July, but as I was leaving, some of the old (pre-1993) problems were beginning to surface and nearly everyone I talk to about the reorganization feels it was a mistake, you're the first I've seen in favor of it. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Considerations for joining flying club | Marty Ross | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | September 30th 04 05:55 AM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |
USAF F-4 | TWINMAKER | Military Aviation | 3 | October 2nd 03 02:28 AM |
USAF Fighter-Attack SPO members from the 1980s? | R Haskin | Military Aviation | 0 | September 20th 03 12:06 PM |
FS Books USAF, Navy, Marine pilots and planes | Ken Insch | Military Aviation | 0 | July 20th 03 02:36 AM |