![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:09:08 -0800, Richard Riley wrote:
An owner who goes that way should also list the engine as experimental. A Cozy builder locally listed his airplane as a Jones Runabout or some such, but listed the Lycoming 360 engine. The assessor said the last plane they'd billed with that kind of engine was a new Cessna 172, therefor the homebuilt was worth as much as the Cessna - $250k. That's a good tip. I would have never thought of the engine being a tax target. Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IO-540 wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:41:02 -0800 (PST), quietguy wrote: On Nov 16, 2:59 pm, IO540 wrote: Wasn't that fee to hold an "N" number one of the ones they are going to raise up quite a bit with the new registration fees? It was part of the FAA's reauthorization/restructuring proposal, which got shot down by Congress this fall: http://www.aopa.org/pilot/features/2007/feat0705.html Look about two-thirds of the way through the AOPA article (from May 2007) and you'll see the proposals: $80 to register a 'special' N- number (i.e., one not assigned at random) and $50 to renew it. Shot down with all the rest -- but soaking us for 'vanity plates' is clearly on their minds at the FAA. It's unclear from the AOPA's wording but it looks as if the FAA wanted to hit us up for these fees every year for existing aircraft as well as for reserved N-numbers. Every year? that would be awful, and just put another nail in the coffin for GA. The FAA is persistant, that's for sure. The B-crats just can't get the thought from their mind that anyone who owns an aircarft is rich, and is a prime target for taxes for them to waste on many of their useless programs. Well getting special N numbers is kind of like vanity plates for cars. It's not like you really need them. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:31:57 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: IO-540 wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:41:02 -0800 (PST), quietguy wrote: Well getting special N numbers is kind of like vanity plates for cars. It's not like you really need them. Well, in a homebuilt, yes you really do. Considering the size of some homebuilts, putting a long N number on can be a challenge. And the FAA issues long, non-descript N numbers. There are no short N numbers left. The best that can be had is two numbers plus two letters, or 3 numbers and one letter, or 4 numbers and no letters. If someone is building a plane that requires a 12" N numbers, due to it's cruise speed, fitting a long number along the side can be tough, especially if it interferes with a nice paint scheme. I'd like a short enough number to fit on the rudder, but there are none available. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IO-540 wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:31:57 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: IO-540 wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:41:02 -0800 (PST), quietguy wrote: Well getting special N numbers is kind of like vanity plates for cars. It's not like you really need them. Well, in a homebuilt, yes you really do. Considering the size of some homebuilts, putting a long N number on can be a challenge. And the FAA issues long, non-descript N numbers. There are no short N numbers left. The best that can be had is two numbers plus two letters, or 3 numbers and one letter, or 4 numbers and no letters. If someone is building a plane that requires a 12" N numbers, due to it's cruise speed, fitting a long number along the side can be tough, especially if it interferes with a nice paint scheme. I'd like a short enough number to fit on the rudder, but there are none available. I doubt a $80 fee is going to be the tipping point especially if you are building an aircraft that that flys fast enough to require 12" letters. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... IO-540 wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:31:57 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder" Well, in a homebuilt, yes you really do. Considering the size of some homebuilts, putting a long N number on can be a challenge. And the FAA issues long, non-descript N numbers. There are no short N numbers left. The best that can be had is two numbers plus two letters, or 3 numbers and one letter, or 4 numbers and no letters. If someone is building a plane that requires a 12" N numbers, due to it's cruise speed, fitting a long number along the side can be tough, especially if it interferes with a nice paint scheme. I'd like a short enough number to fit on the rudder, but there are none available. I doubt a $80 fee is going to be the tipping point especially if you are building an aircraft that that flys fast enough to require 12" letters. In the near future I am going to refinish my fuselage. What are the current N-number size requirements? Wayne http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Paul" wrote in message
... In the near future I am going to refinish my fuselage. What are the current N-number size requirements? Depends on your fuselage. Rich "Insufficient information, Mr. Spock" S. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rich S." wrote in message . .. "Wayne Paul" wrote in message ... In the near future I am going to refinish my fuselage. What are the current N-number size requirements? Depends on your fuselage. Rich "Insufficient information, Mr. Spock" S. OK, I see RVs with 4 inch number and some with 14 inch numbers. There must be a rule that state a "requirement." I am looking for the rule's reference, or a paraphrase of the rule. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Paul" wrote in message ... "Rich S." wrote in message . .. "Wayne Paul" wrote in message ... In the near future I am going to refinish my fuselage. What are the current N-number size requirements? Depends on your fuselage. Rich "Insufficient information, Mr. Spock" S. OK, I see RVs with 4 inch number and some with 14 inch numbers. There must be a rule that state a "requirement." I am looking for the rule's reference, or a paraphrase of the rule. No need to reply. I found the answer. http://www.aircraftcolor.com/ninfo.asp Wayne HP-14 "6F" http://www.soaridaho.com/ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Paul" wrote No need to reply. I found the answer. http://www.aircraftcolor.com/ninfo.asp It should be added that planes arriving back home from an international flight are required to have 12 inch numbers, too. -- Jim in NC |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in message
... "Wayne Paul" wrote No need to reply. I found the answer. http://www.aircraftcolor.com/ninfo.asp It should be added that planes arriving back home from an international flight are required to have 12 inch numbers, too. Plus aircraft of a certain age, or which are built to resemble aircraft of a certain age, if they put an "X" in their number, may have two inch numbers. There are many chapters and verse which apply. Rich "The rest of the story" S. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Expo, meeting JayB, getting stuck in Lancaster on the way home,fulfilling the commercial certificate long solo x-c...long | Jack Allison | Piloting | 6 | November 19th 06 02:31 AM |
Another Long Cross Country: HPN to PAO in 6 Days (long) | Journeyman | Piloting | 19 | June 15th 06 11:47 PM |
30 minute reserve | Chris W | Piloting | 19 | June 15th 05 07:53 PM |
Pitts Number 1 registration number | Mirco | Aerobatics | 3 | December 4th 04 11:50 AM |
FA: New ASA IP Trainer V6.5 IFR - no reserve | Scaggs Island Pilots Supplies | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 26th 03 03:07 AM |