A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

61.113 and expense reimbursements



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 20th 07, 05:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,147
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

Let's cut through the horse****.

I'm a private pilot (no, I'm a commercial pilot, CFI, A&P, IA but let that
go for the moment).

My company sends me to a conference. The company policy pays IRS mileage
(48.5c a mile) for me to get there by private vehicle. Vehicle is
automobile, wagon train, muleback, or any other method I choose.

The company policy says that I can go by myself or carry as many other
employees as I wish in my private vehicle for the same 48.5 cents a mile.

I load up Gerry, Kelly, Sam and myself into the airplane and fly to the
conference. I'm not paid to get to the conference, just be a company
employee while I am at the conference.

I get home without incident.

I bill the company for what would have been automobile mileage and multiply
it by 48.5 cents a mile and submit it. Company pays. Case closed.

I have an accident on the way to or the way from the conference. Let the
lawyers sort it out. I was on company time; let the company lawyers decide
fault and such.

The FARs have relatively little to do with the process. You aren't being
paid to fly; you are being recompensated for getting yourself to the
conference and participating.

Then again, I've only been doing this for forty years, but what do I know?

Jim




--
"If you think you can, or think you can't, you're right."
--Henry Ford


  #2  
Old November 20th 07, 03:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Maxwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,116
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements


"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...
I'm a private pilot. If I fly myself to a business meeting for a
company that I work for and they reimburse me for the cost of the
flight, have I violated FAR 61.113?


Hi Ron,

You might want to reference the thread titled "Ferry flight a commercial
op?" that began last week on 11/13, if you haven't already.

If you follow all the references given, it would seem your situation, and
most any other, has been denied at one time or the other by the FAA.
Granted, by the wording of the FARs most would interpret them to allow your
activity. But actual historical decisions tell another story.


  #3  
Old November 20th 07, 06:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 264
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:38:57 -0800, Ron Garret
wrote:

I'm a private pilot. If I fly myself to a business meeting for a
company that I work for and they reimburse me for the cost of the
flight, have I violated FAR 61.113?

rg


No.

You meet the requirements of 61.113(b)
--ron
  #4  
Old November 21st 07, 04:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
C J Campbell[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default 61.113 and expense reimbursements

On 2007-11-19 10:38:57 -0800, Ron Garret said:

I'm a private pilot. If I fly myself to a business meeting for a
company that I work for and they reimburse me for the cost of the
flight, have I violated FAR 61.113?

rg


Probably not if you are flying by yourself. Questionable if you are
carrying passengers or property on behalf of the company.

Contrary to what others have said, the FAA has been fairly consistent
in their opinions. There is no reason a company cannot reimburse you
for incidental personal transportation expenses. However, carrying
passengers or property for hire must be as a commercial pilot. This is
why companies hire commercial pilots to fly their corporate aircraft.
So carrying passengers or property would probably be considered a
violation.

There are liability issues as well. If there were an accident and you
were carrying these passengers and receiving more than your pro-rata
reimbursement for them, then an insurance company or a tort lawyer
would certainly argue that you were conducting a commercial operation.

Finally, of course, there are Federal Income Tax questions. There may
be some limits there for how much the company can reimburse you.
--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is expense of a new sailplane the reason? Nolaminar Soaring 0 January 7th 05 03:40 PM
expense analysis Rosspilot Owning 12 August 25th 03 03:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.