![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Darkwing" wrote: I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias before long. Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're both Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use whatever engine they want in the NGP. -- Dan T-182T at BFM Wow, that is surprising. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darkwing wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Darkwing" wrote: I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias before long. Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're both Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use whatever engine they want in the NGP. -- Dan T-182T at BFM Wow, that is surprising. Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Darkwing wrote: "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Darkwing" wrote: I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias before long. Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're both Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use whatever engine they want in the NGP. -- Dan T-182T at BFM Wow, that is surprising. Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher. I just figured Lycoming didn't have something the proper size for the Skycatcher. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in
: "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Darkwing wrote: "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Darkwing" wrote: I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias before long. Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're both Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use whatever engine they want in the NGP. -- Dan T-182T at BFM Wow, that is surprising. Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher. I just figured Lycoming didn't have something the proper size for the Skycatcher. Teh o-235 is a good bit heavier than the o-200, which must surely give it the edge in the LSA stakes... Bertie |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darkwing wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Darkwing wrote: "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Darkwing" wrote: I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex- Columbias before long. Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're both Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use whatever engine they want in the NGP. -- Dan T-182T at BFM Wow, that is surprising. Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher. I just figured Lycoming didn't have something the proper size for the Skycatcher. With all the weight the designers burned up you are probably right the Lyc O-235 wouldn't fit. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message ... "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Darkwing wrote: "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Darkwing" wrote: I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias before long. Wow, that is surprising. Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher. I just figured Lycoming didn't have something the proper size for the Skycatcher. Do they have something similar to the twin turbo TSIO-550 for the Columbia? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrote With all the weight the designers burned up you are probably right the Lyc O-235 wouldn't fit. It is surprising that they figured out how to make a conventional engine work out, weight wise, with a 200, so any more weight than that would be out of the question. -- Jim in NC |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:45:01 -0500, "Darkwing"
theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote: I do! Cessna wins Columbia Bid Cessna Aircraft will acquire the assets of Columbia Aircraft of Bend, Ore., following a successful bid for the firm in U.S. bankruptcy court on Nov. 27. Cessna says it wants to "broaden its single-engine product portfolio." Cessna's winning bid was $26.4 million, but the transaction will not be completed until Dec. 4. Cessna officials said Columbia will take on the Cessna name, and the dual-turbocharged 310-horsepower Columbia 400 will become the Cessna 400, while the normally aspirated 310-hp Columbia 350 will be renamed the Cessna 350. Both use the Continental 550 engine. IF I had the money, health, and time I'd go for either the 350 or 400 over most any other single on the market. Roger (K8RI) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darkwing wrote:
I do! I wish I could... G |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna 182 | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 2 | August 8th 07 09:23 PM |
Cessna 182 | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | April 15th 07 01:45 AM |
STC for Cessna 140 | Chris | Home Built | 3 | January 4th 07 12:40 AM |
Cessna 337 | Capt. Mike | Piloting | 17 | December 6th 06 03:33 PM |
Cessna 180 vs. 182 vs. 185 | Marc Lattoni | Piloting | 15 | January 26th 04 09:22 AM |