A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old November 30th 07, 08:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Darkwing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 604
Default Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Darkwing" wrote:
I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias
before long.



Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're both
Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use whatever
engine they want in the NGP.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM


Wow, that is surprising.


  #12  
Old November 30th 07, 08:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?

Darkwing wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Darkwing" wrote:
I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias
before long.



Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're
both Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use
whatever engine they want in the NGP.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM


Wow, that is surprising.


Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher.


  #13  
Old November 30th 07, 09:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Darkwing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 604
Default Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?


"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Darkwing wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Darkwing" wrote:
I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias
before long.


Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're
both Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use
whatever engine they want in the NGP.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM


Wow, that is surprising.


Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher.


I just figured Lycoming didn't have something the proper size for the
Skycatcher.


  #14  
Old November 30th 07, 09:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?

"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in
:


"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Darkwing wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Darkwing" wrote:
I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias
before long.


Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're
both Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use
whatever engine they want in the NGP.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM


Wow, that is surprising.


Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher.


I just figured Lycoming didn't have something the proper size for the
Skycatcher.


Teh o-235 is a good bit heavier than the o-200, which must surely give it
the edge in the LSA stakes...
Bertie


  #15  
Old November 30th 07, 09:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?

Darkwing wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Darkwing wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Darkwing" wrote:
I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-
Columbias before long.


Small chance of that. Cessna hates Lycoming, even though they're
both Textron. Cessna already has permission from Textron to use
whatever engine they want in the NGP.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM


Wow, that is surprising.


Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher.


I just figured Lycoming didn't have something the proper size for the
Skycatcher.


With all the weight the designers burned up you are probably right the Lyc
O-235 wouldn't fit.


  #16  
Old November 30th 07, 09:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt W. Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 427
Default Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?


"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message
...

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Darkwing wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Darkwing" wrote:
I would think Cessna would put Lycoming engines in the ex-Columbias
before long.



Wow, that is surprising.


Well they are using a Cont in the Skycatcher.


I just figured Lycoming didn't have something the proper size for the
Skycatcher.

Do they have something similar to the twin turbo TSIO-550 for the Columbia?


  #17  
Old November 30th 07, 10:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?


"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote

With all the weight the designers burned up you are probably right the Lyc
O-235 wouldn't fit.


It is surprising that they figured out how to make a conventional engine
work out, weight wise, with a 200, so any more weight than that would be out
of the question.
--
Jim in NC


  #18  
Old December 7th 07, 07:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 727
Default Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:45:01 -0500, "Darkwing"
theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote:

I do!

Cessna wins Columbia Bid

Cessna Aircraft will acquire the assets of Columbia Aircraft of Bend, Ore.,
following a successful bid for the firm in U.S. bankruptcy court on Nov. 27.
Cessna says it wants to "broaden its single-engine product portfolio."
Cessna's winning bid was $26.4 million, but the transaction will not be
completed until Dec. 4. Cessna officials said Columbia will take on the
Cessna name, and the dual-turbocharged 310-horsepower Columbia 400 will
become the Cessna 400, while the normally aspirated 310-hp Columbia 350 will
be renamed the Cessna 350. Both use the Continental 550 engine.


IF I had the money, health, and time I'd go for either the 350 or 400
over most any other single on the market.

Roger (K8RI)

  #19  
Old December 7th 07, 11:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
B A R R Y[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 782
Default Anyone want a Cessna 350 or 400?

Darkwing wrote:
I do!


I wish I could... G
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cessna 182 Glenn[_2_] Aviation Photos 2 August 8th 07 09:23 PM
Cessna 182 [email protected] Owning 0 April 15th 07 01:45 AM
STC for Cessna 140 Chris Home Built 3 January 4th 07 12:40 AM
Cessna 337 Capt. Mike Piloting 17 December 6th 06 03:33 PM
Cessna 180 vs. 182 vs. 185 Marc Lattoni Piloting 15 January 26th 04 09:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.