A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Engine configuration



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 13th 07, 06:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
GTH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Engine configuration

Michael Henry a écrit :

There are new aircraft engine designs out the the Jabiru as an
air-cooled example and the Orenda as a liquid-cooled example. They
follow the same pattern that has become the norm.


The Jabiru was designed as a replacement for the VW, and the designers
adopted the same configuration and even the same RPM.

Best regards,
--
Gilles
http://contrails.free.fr
  #2  
Old December 13th 07, 12:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Paul Hastings
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Engine configuration


"Michael Henry" wrote in message
...
Greetings!

My last post provoked a long and interesting series of threads so I am
emboldened to make another post.

This question concerns the configuration or layout of an engine. I have
noticed that air-cooled engines tend to have an opposed configuration
whereas liquid-cooled engines tend to have a V configuration. Both are
also available inline but I'll take a leap and say these are a minority
(I'm talking about current production engines not historical engines).
There are some liquid-cooled horizontally-opposed engines but I can't
think of any air-cooled "V" engines. Why is this? It suggests to me that
the advantages of the V configuration are specific to liquid cooling. Is
this really the case?

The Wikipedia article on "V Engine" is quite short but it includes this:

"Certain types of V engine have been built as inverted engines,
most commonly for aircraft. Advantages include better visibility
in a single-engined airplane, and lower centre of gravity."

OK, these are two pretty good advantages! There are no disadvantages
listed. So why isn't the Lycoming O-540 or the Continental O-520 an
inverted V?

Regards,

Michael


Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are
limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the
Harley guys)

Paul


  #3  
Old December 14th 07, 03:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 310
Default Engine configuration

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings"
wrote:


"Michael Henry" wrote in message
...
Greetings!

My last post provoked a long and interesting series of threads so I am
emboldened to make another post.

This question concerns the configuration or layout of an engine. I have
noticed that air-cooled engines tend to have an opposed configuration
whereas liquid-cooled engines tend to have a V configuration. Both are
also available inline but I'll take a leap and say these are a minority
(I'm talking about current production engines not historical engines).
There are some liquid-cooled horizontally-opposed engines but I can't
think of any air-cooled "V" engines. Why is this? It suggests to me that
the advantages of the V configuration are specific to liquid cooling. Is
this really the case?

The Wikipedia article on "V Engine" is quite short but it includes this:

"Certain types of V engine have been built as inverted engines,
most commonly for aircraft. Advantages include better visibility
in a single-engined airplane, and lower centre of gravity."

OK, these are two pretty good advantages! There are no disadvantages
listed. So why isn't the Lycoming O-540 or the Continental O-520 an
inverted V?

Regards,

Michael


Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are
limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the
Harley guys)

Paul

***************************************

Paul

What about us Indian guys )

Big John
  #4  
Old December 14th 07, 04:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default Engine configuration

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:57:56 -0600, Big John wrote:

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings"
Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are
limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the
Harley guys)


Paul

What about us Indian guys )


With all the casino money, you can buy whatever engine you want. :-)

Ron Wanttaja
  #5  
Old December 14th 07, 05:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Engine configuration

"Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:57:56 -0600, Big John wrote:

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings"
Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they
are
limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring
out the
Harley guys)


Paul

What about us Indian guys )


With all the casino money, you can buy whatever engine you want. :-)

Ron Wanttaja


Good one, Ron!

Peter :-)



  #6  
Old December 14th 07, 06:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 310
Default Engine configuration

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:11:01 -0800, Ron Wanttaja
wrote:

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:57:56 -0600, Big John wrote:

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings"
Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are
limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the
Harley guys)


Paul

What about us Indian guys )


With all the casino money, you can buy whatever engine you want. :-)

Ron Wanttaja


*****************************
Ron

I spoke about an Indian motorcycle (in reply to the comment "that
ought to bring out the Harley guys"). Guess those bikes were before
most of the times for many in this group )

Big John
  #7  
Old December 14th 07, 06:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
GTH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Engine configuration

Big John a écrit :


I spoke about an Indian motorcycle (in reply to the comment "that
ought to bring out the Harley guys"). Guess those bikes were before
most of the times for many in this group )


Big John,

I had got the Indian bikes message correct. I also met Ariel Saquare
Fours, the lot.

Best regards,
--
Gilles
http://contrails.free.fr
  #8  
Old December 15th 07, 06:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 340
Default Engine configuration

In article ,
Big John wrote:

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:11:01 -0800, Ron Wanttaja
wrote:

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:57:56 -0600, Big John wrote:

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings"
Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they
are
limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring
out the
Harley guys)

Paul

What about us Indian guys )


With all the casino money, you can buy whatever engine you want. :-)

Ron Wanttaja


*****************************
Ron

I spoke about an Indian motorcycle (in reply to the comment "that
ought to bring out the Harley guys"). Guess those bikes were before
most of the times for many in this group )

Big John


Until a year or two ago, they were making them new down the road in
Gilroy, CA.

Too bad they couldn't make a go of it.
  #9  
Old December 13th 07, 02:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default Engine configuration


"Michael Henry" wrote in message
...
Greetings!

My last post provoked a long and interesting series of threads so I am
emboldened to make another post.

This question concerns the configuration or layout of an engine. I have
noticed that air-cooled engines tend to have an opposed configuration
whereas liquid-cooled engines tend to have a V configuration. Both are
also available inline but I'll take a leap and say these are a minority
(I'm talking about current production engines not historical engines).
There are some liquid-cooled horizontally-opposed engines but I can't
think of any air-cooled "V" engines. Why is this? It suggests to me that
the advantages of the V configuration are specific to liquid cooling. Is
this really the case?

The Wikipedia article on "V Engine" is quite short but it includes this:

"Certain types of V engine have been built as inverted engines,
most commonly for aircraft. Advantages include better visibility
in a single-engined airplane, and lower centre of gravity."

OK, these are two pretty good advantages! There are no disadvantages
listed. So why isn't the Lycoming O-540 or the Continental O-520 an
inverted V?

Regards,

Michael


I can think of two inverted "V" air cooled aero engines that were produced
in quantity.
One is the German Argus As 10C 240HP used in the Me 108 and the Storch and
the other is the American Ranger V-770 inverted V12.
See: http://www.oldengine.org/members/die...ord/Ranger.htm
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_As_10


  #10  
Old December 13th 07, 04:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Darrel Toepfer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 289
Default Engine configuration

"Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:

I can think of two inverted "V" air cooled aero engines that were
produced in quantity.
One is the German Argus As 10C 240HP used in the Me 108 and the Storch
and the other is the American Ranger V-770 inverted V12.
See: http://www.oldengine.org/members/die...ord/Ranger.htm
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_As_10


LOM's are still in production: http://www.moraviation.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
R172K Approach Configuration facpi Instrument Flight Rules 10 January 5th 07 03:58 PM
V-22 Prop Configuration, 3-vs-4 blades Don McIntyre Naval Aviation 23 April 10th 06 03:23 AM
T-2C Buckeye nav light configuration. Mike W. Naval Aviation 14 March 17th 05 07:05 AM
Question about center-line push-pull engine configuration Shin Gou Home Built 4 June 7th 04 05:57 PM
Hyping the Intermeshing Configuration Dave Jackson Rotorcraft 0 October 31st 03 08:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.