![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Henry a écrit :
There are new aircraft engine designs out the the Jabiru as an air-cooled example and the Orenda as a liquid-cooled example. They follow the same pattern that has become the norm. The Jabiru was designed as a replacement for the VW, and the designers adopted the same configuration and even the same RPM. Best regards, -- Gilles http://contrails.free.fr |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Henry" wrote in message ... Greetings! My last post provoked a long and interesting series of threads so I am emboldened to make another post. This question concerns the configuration or layout of an engine. I have noticed that air-cooled engines tend to have an opposed configuration whereas liquid-cooled engines tend to have a V configuration. Both are also available inline but I'll take a leap and say these are a minority (I'm talking about current production engines not historical engines). There are some liquid-cooled horizontally-opposed engines but I can't think of any air-cooled "V" engines. Why is this? It suggests to me that the advantages of the V configuration are specific to liquid cooling. Is this really the case? The Wikipedia article on "V Engine" is quite short but it includes this: "Certain types of V engine have been built as inverted engines, most commonly for aircraft. Advantages include better visibility in a single-engined airplane, and lower centre of gravity." OK, these are two pretty good advantages! There are no disadvantages listed. So why isn't the Lycoming O-540 or the Continental O-520 an inverted V? Regards, Michael Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the Harley guys) Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings"
wrote: "Michael Henry" wrote in message ... Greetings! My last post provoked a long and interesting series of threads so I am emboldened to make another post. This question concerns the configuration or layout of an engine. I have noticed that air-cooled engines tend to have an opposed configuration whereas liquid-cooled engines tend to have a V configuration. Both are also available inline but I'll take a leap and say these are a minority (I'm talking about current production engines not historical engines). There are some liquid-cooled horizontally-opposed engines but I can't think of any air-cooled "V" engines. Why is this? It suggests to me that the advantages of the V configuration are specific to liquid cooling. Is this really the case? The Wikipedia article on "V Engine" is quite short but it includes this: "Certain types of V engine have been built as inverted engines, most commonly for aircraft. Advantages include better visibility in a single-engined airplane, and lower centre of gravity." OK, these are two pretty good advantages! There are no disadvantages listed. So why isn't the Lycoming O-540 or the Continental O-520 an inverted V? Regards, Michael Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the Harley guys) Paul *************************************** Paul What about us Indian guys ![]() Big John |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:57:56 -0600, Big John wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings" Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the Harley guys) Paul What about us Indian guys ![]() With all the casino money, you can buy whatever engine you want. :-) Ron Wanttaja |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message
... On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:57:56 -0600, Big John wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings" Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the Harley guys) Paul What about us Indian guys ![]() With all the casino money, you can buy whatever engine you want. :-) Ron Wanttaja Good one, Ron! Peter :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:11:01 -0800, Ron Wanttaja
wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:57:56 -0600, Big John wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings" Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the Harley guys) Paul What about us Indian guys ![]() With all the casino money, you can buy whatever engine you want. :-) Ron Wanttaja ***************************** Ron I spoke about an Indian motorcycle (in reply to the comment "that ought to bring out the Harley guys"). Guess those bikes were before most of the times for many in this group ![]() Big John |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John a écrit :
I spoke about an Indian motorcycle (in reply to the comment "that ought to bring out the Harley guys"). Guess those bikes were before most of the times for many in this group ![]() Big John, I had got the Indian bikes message correct. I also met Ariel Saquare Fours, the lot. Best regards, -- Gilles http://contrails.free.fr |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Big John wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:11:01 -0800, Ron Wanttaja wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:57:56 -0600, Big John wrote: On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:59:11 GMT, "Paul Hastings" Lots of motorcycles out there that are air cooled v-twins. Granted they are limited in horsepower for their displacement. ;^) (that ought to bring out the Harley guys) Paul What about us Indian guys ![]() With all the casino money, you can buy whatever engine you want. :-) Ron Wanttaja ***************************** Ron I spoke about an Indian motorcycle (in reply to the comment "that ought to bring out the Harley guys"). Guess those bikes were before most of the times for many in this group ![]() Big John Until a year or two ago, they were making them new down the road in Gilroy, CA. Too bad they couldn't make a go of it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Henry" wrote in message ... Greetings! My last post provoked a long and interesting series of threads so I am emboldened to make another post. This question concerns the configuration or layout of an engine. I have noticed that air-cooled engines tend to have an opposed configuration whereas liquid-cooled engines tend to have a V configuration. Both are also available inline but I'll take a leap and say these are a minority (I'm talking about current production engines not historical engines). There are some liquid-cooled horizontally-opposed engines but I can't think of any air-cooled "V" engines. Why is this? It suggests to me that the advantages of the V configuration are specific to liquid cooling. Is this really the case? The Wikipedia article on "V Engine" is quite short but it includes this: "Certain types of V engine have been built as inverted engines, most commonly for aircraft. Advantages include better visibility in a single-engined airplane, and lower centre of gravity." OK, these are two pretty good advantages! There are no disadvantages listed. So why isn't the Lycoming O-540 or the Continental O-520 an inverted V? Regards, Michael I can think of two inverted "V" air cooled aero engines that were produced in quantity. One is the German Argus As 10C 240HP used in the Me 108 and the Storch and the other is the American Ranger V-770 inverted V12. See: http://www.oldengine.org/members/die...ord/Ranger.htm and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_As_10 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
I can think of two inverted "V" air cooled aero engines that were produced in quantity. One is the German Argus As 10C 240HP used in the Me 108 and the Storch and the other is the American Ranger V-770 inverted V12. See: http://www.oldengine.org/members/die...ord/Ranger.htm and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_As_10 LOM's are still in production: http://www.moraviation.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R172K Approach Configuration | facpi | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | January 5th 07 03:58 PM |
V-22 Prop Configuration, 3-vs-4 blades | Don McIntyre | Naval Aviation | 23 | April 10th 06 03:23 AM |
T-2C Buckeye nav light configuration. | Mike W. | Naval Aviation | 14 | March 17th 05 07:05 AM |
Question about center-line push-pull engine configuration | Shin Gou | Home Built | 4 | June 7th 04 05:57 PM |
Hyping the Intermeshing Configuration | Dave Jackson | Rotorcraft | 0 | October 31st 03 08:34 PM |