![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gatt" wrote in
: "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message news:0c2b0515-acb4-4050-844e- Do some believe that an airplane generates lift as a result of the speed of the wheels? Maybe if they fast-forward the videotape they'll generate even more lift. That's how Anthony would do it! Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Clark wrote:
For those interested in such things, the MythBusters show titled "Airplane on a Conveyor Belt" is in TVGuide to air tonight at 9pm Eastern US on Discovery/Discovery HD. Myth busted, Airplane (ultralight on a 2000' "treadmill") took off normally. As did a model on a small treadmill. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ManhattanMan,
Myth busted, What myth? gd&r -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 30, 2:36*pm, Peter Clark
wrote: For those interested in such things, the MythBusters show titled "Airplane on a Conveyor Belt" is in TVGuide to air tonight at 9pm Eastern US on Discovery/Discovery HD. Anybody who believes that a plane can't take off from a conveyor belt is ignorant, and doesn't understand basic Physics... The rolling resistance of a wheel rotating at twice the takeoff speed is nowhere near the thrust produced by a spinning propellor at takeoff power. The only resistance that a wheel provides is from the friction of the bearings, and the deformation of the tire. Neither of these forces come close the the thrust produced by the prop. I still can't believe how many pilots on this board actually argued that the plane can't take off. Anyone who made that argument needs to sign up for a class in Physics. The math for this situation is pretty simple. Fprop_thrust - Fwheel_rolling_resistance = Ftakeoff_thrust F=m*A is then used to calculate the acceleration of the airplane on the conveyor belt. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Jan 30, 2:36 pm, Peter Clark wrote: For those interested in such things, the MythBusters show titled "Airplane on a Conveyor Belt" is in TVGuide to air tonight at 9pm Eastern US on Discovery/Discovery HD. Any pilot (including the one that flew the plane on the show) and believed they'd stand "like a brick" should fear their next BFR. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert Barker" wrote:
wrote in message .. . On Jan 30, 2:36 pm, Peter Clark wrote: For those interested in such things, the MythBusters show titled "Airplane on a Conveyor Belt" is in TVGuide to air tonight at 9pm Eastern US on Discovery/Discovery HD. Any pilot (including the one that flew the plane on the show) and believed they'd stand "like a brick" should fear their next BFR. Why? His conceptual confusion is obviously not uncommon or entirely without cause - after all, consider the case of landing on that same treadmill and applying the brakes. What do you think happens? Is it immediately obvious, or do you have to spend some time thinking about it to get the resulting motion correct? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. . "Robert Barker" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Jan 30, 2:36 pm, Peter Clark wrote: For those interested in such things, the MythBusters show titled "Airplane on a Conveyor Belt" is in TVGuide to air tonight at 9pm Eastern US on Discovery/Discovery HD. Any pilot (including the one that flew the plane on the show) and believed they'd stand "like a brick" should fear their next BFR. Why? His conceptual confusion is obviously not uncommon or entirely without cause - after all, consider the case of landing on that same treadmill and applying the brakes. What do you think happens? Is it immediately obvious, or do you have to spend some time thinking about it to get the resulting motion correct? No, I can perhaps understand the misconception in non-pilots. But for a pilot not to understand tells me he slept through a lot of his ground school... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Barker" wrote in message No, I can perhaps understand the misconception in non-pilots. But for a pilot not to understand tells me he slept through a lot of his ground school... Or just hasn't thought it through fully. If you don't properly visualize the experiment it's easy to think "Well, that's stupid. The airplane's not going to take off from a conveyor belt because it's not going anywhere. Otherwise, it would take off if you were sitting on the ground and applied full throttle..." ....which, of course, is exactly what it does. ...just not where you've parked it. The discussion must specifiy the length of the conveyor belt because when I heard it I visualized a treadmill about the same length as the airplane and thought the experiment was talking about VTOL. -c |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Robert Barker" wrote: "Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . "Robert Barker" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Jan 30, 2:36 pm, Peter Clark wrote: For those interested in such things, the MythBusters show titled "Airplane on a Conveyor Belt" is in TVGuide to air tonight at 9pm Eastern US on Discovery/Discovery HD. Any pilot (including the one that flew the plane on the show) and believed they'd stand "like a brick" should fear their next BFR. Why? His conceptual confusion is obviously not uncommon or entirely without cause - after all, consider the case of landing on that same treadmill and applying the brakes. What do you think happens? Is it immediately obvious, or do you have to spend some time thinking about it to get the resulting motion correct? No, I can perhaps understand the misconception in non-pilots. But for a pilot not to understand tells me he slept through a lot of his ground school... It is possible that the pilot was told by the producers to say this even though he knew better in order to create drama. I'm not saying this happened, only that it's a possibility. This sort of thing does happen in television. rg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mythbusters/airplane/treadmill | Harry K | Home Built | 0 | January 25th 08 03:42 AM |
FYI: Dec 12 MythBusters: Airplane Hour | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 217 | December 21st 07 11:33 AM |
FYI: Dec 12 MythBusters: Airplane Hour | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 113 | December 16th 07 07:29 PM |
Two conveyor belt scenarios | [email protected] | Piloting | 24 | September 27th 06 05:32 AM |
MythBusters | Hilton | Piloting | 7 | February 4th 04 03:30 AM |