|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
January 19th 04, 04:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Andreas Parsch" wrote in message ... They were technology demonstrators, which were expected to be developed directly into fighter prototypes. Therefore, the X-32/35 could have been properly designated as XF-24/25. Assuming that #25 would have been the winner, the JSF _prototypes_ would have become the YF-25. This technology demonstration was only going to produce one winner, which would have become the F-24 program without the intervention of the previously mentioned DoD official. The first few produced would have been prototypes and designated YF-24. 
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Canadian ATC aircraft designation | abripl | Home Built | 2 | February 4th 05 05:35 PM |
| Designation Book | David R Townend | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 4th 04 02:29 AM |
| Aircraft Designation Book | David R Townend | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 03 02:25 AM |
| Aircraft Designation Book | David R Townend | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 16th 03 02:25 AM |
| Aircraft Designation Book | David R Townend | Home Built | 0 | October 16th 03 02:25 AM |
Hybrid Mode
