USAF F-16 Instructor Discusses Flying Into MOAs

On Apr 4, 3:19*pm, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:
On Apr 4, 3:18 pm, buttman wrote:



The military doesn't have to obey the FARs. They have their own rules
they go by.

The military is subject to the FARs.

But any punitive actions as a result of such violations are up to the
discretion of the military.

-Robert

And with the current administration, you can expect a
further decline in justice in our fair nation.

With respect to illegal immigration, yes. In all other respects, you're way
better off than you'd be with any alternative administration.

Larry Dighera wrote:
And with the current administration, you can expect a
further decline in justice in our fair nation.

Larry, did you ever decide why, if the government would go to all the
trouble of setting up a big lie to get us into Iraq they wouldn't plant
the WMDs they lied about in the first place?

Robert Moore wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote
Larry, did you ever decide why, if the government would go to all the
trouble of setting up a big lie to get us into Iraq they wouldn't plant
the WMDs they lied about in the first place?

Probably because someone would have to do the "planting" and all-hell
would break loose and heads would roll when their book hit the book store
shelves.

Bob Moore

Someone would have also have had to do the planing of the big lie.

On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:38:20 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
And with the current administration, you can expect a
further decline in justice in our fair nation.

Larry, did you ever decide why, if the government would go to all the
trouble of setting up a big lie to get us into Iraq they wouldn't plant
the WMDs they lied about in the first place?

There was no need to find WMD; their objectives were accomplished when
the RNC and their spokes-puppet Bush under the direction of
Darth-Chenny conned us into engaging in the Iraq war for personal and
political gain.

Watch the 1st half of Frontline piece, and your questions will be
answered: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/ . Until
you've done that, you lack the proper perspective to discuss the
topic.

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:38:20 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
And with the current administration, you can expect a
further decline in justice in our fair nation.
Larry, did you ever decide why, if the government would go to all the
trouble of setting up a big lie to get us into Iraq they wouldn't plant
the WMDs they lied about in the first place?

There was no need to find WMD; their objectives were accomplished when
the RNC and their spokes-puppet Bush under the direction of
Darth-Chenny conned us into engaging in the Iraq war for personal and
political gain.

You have got to be kidding! If there had been evidence of WMD or better
yet a tank full of anthrax sitting next to a missile delivery system the
American people would still be 75% in support of any action that the
Bush administration has taken or might ever take in the Mid-East.



Watch the 1st half of Frontline piece, and your questions will be
answered: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/ . Until
you've done that, you lack the proper perspective to discuss the
topic.

Eat **** Larry. I don't get all my news and current events information
from a single source and anyone that does be it PBS or Fox News is an
idiot. I'm pretty sure if they had come up with some new information
that proves that the Bush administration intentionally lied about WMDs
I'd have heard about it. Probably from C-SPAN when the article of
impeachment were drawn up.

On Apr 7, 8:55*am, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

Probably because someone would have to do the "planting" and all-hell
would break loose and heads would roll when their book hit the book store
shelves.

Bob Moore

Someone would have also have had to do the planing of the big lie.

Don't burst the bubble. The great thing about conspiracy theories is
that you can't disprove them. They are self-proving.
Interesting that DC can't keep a BJ secret but apparently they can
keep projects secret like UFO's, alien abductions and Iraq
conspiracies secret.

If you want to get information out to the public quickly, just make it
top secret.

-Robert

On Apr 7, 9:26*am, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:38:20 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder

Watch the 1st half of Frontline piece, and your questions will be
answered:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/. *Until
you've done that, you lack the proper perspective to discuss the
topic.


So you have to watch a documentary made by a democrat funded
organization (PBS) before you can discuss the topic?? You know that
Republicans have been trying to pull the plug on public funding of PBS
for decades and that there is no love for Republicans at PBS.


-Robert

On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:41:49 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:38:20 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
And with the current administration, you can expect a
further decline in justice in our fair nation.
Larry, did you ever decide why, if the government would go to all the
trouble of setting up a big lie to get us into Iraq they wouldn't plant
the WMDs they lied about in the first place?

There was no need to find WMD; their objectives were accomplished when
the RNC and their spokes-puppet Bush under the direction of
Darth-Chenny conned us into engaging in the Iraq war for personal and
political gain.

You have got to be kidding! If there had been evidence of WMD or better
yet a tank full of anthrax sitting next to a missile delivery system the
American people would still be 75% in support of any action that the
Bush administration has taken or might ever take in the Mid-East.


Why would they need that?


Watch the 1st half of Frontline piece, and your questions will be
answered: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/ . Until
you've done that, you lack the proper perspective to discuss the
topic.

Eat **** Larry.

No thanks.

I don't get all my news and current events information
from a single source and anyone that does be it PBS or Fox News is an
idiot. I'm pretty sure if they had come up with some new information
that proves that the Bush administration intentionally lied about WMDs
I'd have heard about it. Probably from C-SPAN when the article of
impeachment were drawn up.

Who cares?

On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:18:38 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote:

On Apr 7, 9:26*am, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:38:20 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder

Watch the 1st half of Frontline piece, and your questions will be
answered:http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/. *Until
you've done that, you lack the proper perspective to discuss the
topic.


So you have to watch a documentary made by a democrat funded
organization (PBS) before you can discuss the topic?? You know that
Republicans have been trying to pull the plug on public funding of PBS
for decades and that there is no love for Republicans at PBS.


-Robert


I posted a link in the original article in the "OT: Bush's War' thread
that indicates that PBS programming is more conservative than liberal.
I guess you missed that.