![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 14, 6:21*am, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote: Peter Clark wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:19:54 -0700 (PDT), SD wrote: Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? Who has better manuverability? *Better manuverability has to give way. I think in this case the question is, "who has shields?"- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - When you are submitting reports to FAA or NTSB, do you get fined for misspelling balloon or rombulan? I just wanted to know because I plan on submitting a report the next time I come into contact with an unresponsive flock of warbirds. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "SD" wrote in message ... Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. I tried to hail him but I had no luck. Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? You should then immediately hail Mary. BS,TP |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SD wrote:
Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. How can a dead Warbird do anything, much less disrobe? You should have fired your phasors, as there is nothing more disturbing to the space-time continuum than naked Romulans. Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. If there was no wake turbulence then he wasn't using impulse power. Clearly you are mistaken. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, Yes they are - under "weight-shift-control," also known as "warp drive." Just because the warp drive is not in use at that time, they are still classified as warp drive wessels (as Chekov would call them.) Sheesh, what are they teaching in ground school these days? What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? Dropping hail onto it would be in violation of 91.15 "Dropping Objects". The approved method is use of phasors. See 91.99 of the FARs. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 4:19*am, SD wrote:
Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? Use only drugs as approved by the director. Cheers |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:19:54 -0700 (PDT), SD
wrote: I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Generally, yes; that's how I interpret the regulation, but the necessity to alter course to the _right_ is only mentioned in (e): http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text... .1.3.10.2.4.7 (e) Approaching head-on. When aircraft are approaching each other head-on, or nearly so, each pilot of each aircraft shall alter course to the right. However there are other pertinent situations: (f) Overtaking. Each aircraft that is being overtaken has the right-of-way and each pilot of an overtaking aircraft shall alter course to the right to pass well clear. So if you're flying your motor-glider (wich is classed as a glider, not an engine driven aircraft if I understand correctly) and overtaking an airplane, you don't have right-of-way, FAR 91.113(d) notwithstanding, unless your flight is in distress. Then there are the issues of landing, towing, and refueling aircraft.... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 4:19*am, SD wrote:
Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? You think "Damn Romulans, what shall I do" and a big ballon appears above your head with those words in it. The Romulan sees the huge ballon and gives way (as all good cartoon pilots must obey Federation aviation rules when manuvering in .sector 0 planet atmoshphere). Cheers |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't **** off the Romulans - they don't have any bathrooms on board and are
usually really cranky after a few years of holding it. Your best bet is to make a temporal adjustment and proceed straight ahead a few femtoseconds before the warbird got there. Don't cut it too close though. "SD" wrote in message ... Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. I tried to hail him but I had no luck. Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "SD" wrote in message ... I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. I pretty much grasp the concept well. Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? As a guy who flew gliders exclusively for his first few years in the cockpit, I learned to totally disregard FAR 91.113d in most situations. (cue collective gasp from newsgroup readers.) The ROW rules only work when both pilots see each other, know the rules, and are inclined to follow them. Frankly, it is rare that we can assume that all of those conditions are met. Therefore, 91.113d is mostly useful for assigning blame after an accident has already occurred. As much as possible, I always assume the other plane has the ROW, and try to occupy a bit of airspace that is well out of his way. Vaughn |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vaughn Simon" wrote ... Therefore, 91.113d is mostly useful for assigning blame after an accident has already occurred. As much as possible, I always assume the other plane has the ROW, and try to occupy a bit of airspace that is well out of his way. I am aghast that you would use Common Sense over the Letter of the Law. You have no place in this newsgroup! (well,... the way it's been lately anyway) ;-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 11:19*am, SD wrote:
Hello- I have a quick question/concern regarding FAR 91.113d. *I pretty much grasp the concept well. *Basically apply the acronym BGAAR (baloons, gliders, airships, airplanes and helo's). *For example, If I am flying my Cessna and a balloon is about 2 mi ahead of me I will alter course to the right and give it the ROW. *Likewise for any of the other items on that list except, helo's, right? Well in the event that I come across a vessel that is not listed in 91.113d, what do I do? *Yesterday I was flying and a Rombulan Warbird decloaked and was dead ahead of me. *I tried to hail him but I had no luck. *Since he was traveling at impulse power I was able to maneuver around him. *There was no wake turbulence or anything of that sort. Although starships are not included in 91.113d, I typically just give them the right away. *Its easy on planet earth since we are in Federation airspace, all federation vessels are not cloaked and tend to travel at impulse power. *I am concerned about the Rombulan Warbird however. What should I do in this case especially if I cannot hail the Warbird? The starship's inertial dampers give her more maneuverability than you, so technically you have the ROW. However Romulans are notorious for ignoring the FARs, so your best bet is to steer well clear of the warbird. Whatever you do, do not pass the warbird. The Romulans take this as a sign of disrespect. There have been many atmosphere-rage incidents in which aircraft have been vaporized by warbirds. So unless your Cessna has shields that can absorb a disruptor blast, use extreme caution. Proconsul Phil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MA-8 Static test firing of MA-8 Atlas 113D S62-06634.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 10th 07 02:51 PM |
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no | gasman | Soaring | 0 | August 26th 05 06:39 PM |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
B-2 question | Harley W Daugherty | Military Aviation | 37 | August 27th 04 12:45 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |