County Sheriff Arrests Pilot After Botched Landing

On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:40:08 -0500, Jim Logajan
wrote in :


Gig, you deliberately edited Larry's original sentence from:

"I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law,"

to:

"I had no idea airmen operate under a federal law."

then had the nerve to falsely attribute the latter sentence to him. Larry
actually had to edit your reply to return the sentence to its original
statement. What's up with that sort of nonsense?

Revealing isn't it? Disappointing too. Not to mention immature,
sophomoric, duplicitous, devious, disingenuous, shifty, sneaky,
underhanded, deceptive, deceitful, sly, dishonest ...

And here I thought no one was paying attention. You've got a sharp
eye, Jim.

I think some folks use Usenet as a tavern. They just don't realize
how transparent they are when inebriated.

Jim Logajan wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:38:19 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote in
:

Larry Dighera wrote:
I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law.

Really Larry, you didn't know?

How would I know? It's not in the FARs that I'm aware of.

Are you able to cite the specific federal law that indicates airmen
have implied consent to law enforcement taking bodily specimens?


That's not what I asked.

Gig, you deliberately edited Larry's original sentence from:

"I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law,"

to:

"I had no idea airmen operate under a federal law."

then had the nerve to falsely attribute the latter sentence to him. Larry
actually had to edit your reply to return the sentence to its original
statement. What's up with that sort of nonsense?

That is exactly what I did because he did the same thing to one of my
posts earlier this week. You caught it, he didn't. Good work.

Um, my math says half, not twice.

Jim

--
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought
without accepting it."
--Aristotle


blood alcohol content (BAC) of .04 percent or greater. [That's
twice the 0.08% BAC limit for motorists.]

On Thu, 15 May 2008 15:22:49 -0700, "RST Engineering"
wrote in
:

Um, my math says half, not twice.


Thank you for the correction.