![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bernard/Bernadine were late war projects, and were essentially unjammable by
the Allies at that time. v/r Gordon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snippage of earlier stuff
....And yet another question: Was the RAF's night fighter GCI force controlled in a similar manner to the Luftwaffe's 'Himmelbett' fighters? Was the success of the RAF's night fighter force compared to Himmelbett simply due to the fact that the Luftwaffe wasn't sending n-hundred-aircraft bomber streams over England, or was there a more efficient structure in place? Cheers, Jakob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Jakob
Whitfield writes snippage of earlier stuff ...And yet another question: Was the RAF's night fighter GCI force controlled in a similar manner to the Luftwaffe's 'Himmelbett' fighters? You answered your own question. GCI = Ground Controlled Interception. Presumably the controller used the CHL radars to guide the fighters to within a couple of miles of the target and on a chase course. Was the success of the RAF's night fighter force compared to Himmelbett simply due to the fact that the Luftwaffe wasn't sending n-hundred-aircraft bomber streams over England, or was there a more efficient structure in place? Most accounts seem to refer to a lack of targets compared to a bomber stream. Mike -- M.J.Powell |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "M. J. Powell" wrote in message ... In message , Jakob Whitfield writes snippage of earlier stuff ...And yet another question: Was the RAF's night fighter GCI force controlled in a similar manner to the Luftwaffe's 'Himmelbett' fighters? You answered your own question. GCI = Ground Controlled Interception. Presumably the controller used the CHL radars to guide the fighters to within a couple of miles of the target and on a chase course. No sir. CHL had no inland coverage, the GCI stations used a variety of radars ranging from the fixed Happidromes to mobile higher frequency radars like the type 15 http://www.radarpages.co.uk/mob/gci/gci.htm Keith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jakob
Whitfield writes Greetings all, As the term paper for my Systems Engineering option, I want to do a systems comparison between Fighter Command, the Jagdwaffe, and the Nachtjagd C^3 systems. I've been able to find a loads on Fighter Command, but precious little on the German side that gives command structure and organisational data. Most of the references I've got concentrate on the aircraft used, rather than C^3. Could anyone make any useful suggestions for books, papers, journal articles etc. that I could use to research this? Cheers, Jakob "The Other Battle, Luftwaffe Night Aces versus Bomber Command", Peter Hinchcliffe, Airlife Publishing, UK, 1996. ISBN 1840373032. This tracesthe development of the Nachtjagd and RAF Bomber Command, with personal accounts of experiences by the people involved at several levels. HTH. -- Peter Ying tong iddle-i po! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Australia to participate in US missile defence program | David Bromage | Military Aviation | 40 | December 13th 03 01:52 PM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |
[AU] Defence support for Bush visit | David Bromage | Military Aviation | 7 | October 23rd 03 05:04 AM |
FS Luftwaffe books | Ken Insch | Military Aviation | 0 | August 1st 03 05:03 AM |
Joint Russian-French 5th generation fighter? | lihakirves | Military Aviation | 1 | July 5th 03 01:36 AM |