Pentagon "lost" $1 trillion

(BUFDRVR) wrote in message ...
I see you don't like it, Gordon. Good!. BTW where are the planes
which tracks were lost by Pentagon? It is not sewing-machines.
These are military planes.

Of course I see you ignored my post that pointed out the "lost" aircraft in the
GAO report were *U.S. Army* aircraft and the ones claimed shot down over Serbia
were USAF, USN and USMC. No US Army aircraft flew over Serbia, thus they could
not have been the ones claimed lost by the envious Russians. Conversely, since
the GAO didn't report lost USAF, USN or USMC aircraft that must mean the
Russian report isn't woth its weight in crap shocking


Of course I ignore all your posts. I told you do want my comments
to your crap you have to appologize first (you know for what).
Otherewise sorry, my dear you was shoot down somethere over
Yugoslavia and missing since that time.

Michael


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"

Of course I ignore all your posts.

No you don't. What you are guilty of is posting ridiculous jealous Russian
garbage and then run away when confronted with facts. That's exactly as you've
done here.

I told you do want my comments
to your crap you have to appologize first (you know for what).

ROFLMAO....for confronting you with facts? You'll never get an apology out of
me for that.

Otherewise sorry, my dear you was shoot down somethere over
Yugoslavia and missing since that time.

The Serbs are allowing me to use a computer hooked up to the internet? Mighty
nice of them. What has my family been told? Aren't they (and the media) a bit
curious about a B-52 pilot who deployed to a conflict 5 years ago and never
returned?


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"

nt (Krztalizer) wrote:
That's 56 of what type of airplanes out of
an inventory of how
many total airplanes?

This just came to my mind. those 56 airplanes
could be
those that were accounted by Russian intel
agencies
as shot down in Yugoslavia and denied by pentagon.

Quite logical indeed. Pentagon can say what
ever they want
to public but not to GAO inspectors.

Classic Petukhov - find a way to hammer any
square peg into his "Serb Victory"
hole, no matter how poor the fit.
Aren't Michael and Venik one and the same? They still can't believe only
two fixed-wing aircraft were lost in ALLIED FORCE, no matter what even the
Yugos say admitting only two kills (interesting they've now admitted as such
now that old Slobo is now in The Hague).

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!

In article , Krztalizer
writes
That's 56 of what type of airplanes out of an inventory of how
many total airplanes?

This just came to my mind. those 56 airplanes could be
those that were accounted by Russian intel agencies
as shot down in Yugoslavia and denied by pentagon.

Quite logical indeed. Pentagon can say what ever they want
to public but not to GAO inspectors.

Classic Petukhov - find a way to hammer any square peg into his "Serb Victory"
hole, no matter how poor the fit.

That conjures up exceedingly unpleasant images, and I haven't had my
breakfast yet.
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!

BUFDRVR wrote:

ROFLMAO...ok...now we're cooking with gas....I couldn't wait for this guy to
bring this up. Hey...uhh...genius....the U.S. Army never flew any aircraft
(including helicopters) over Yugoslavia during Operation ALLIED FORCE. If you
anti-American conspiracy nuts would put as much time in research as you did in
building conspiracys, you may not sound as dumb as you do.

But you're in the USAF no? How can you possibly know about
the secret aircraft that the Army has, and flew and lost in
operations over Yugoland?

The $100B of "missing" Pentagon money could easily be mapped
to 56 "missing" US aircraft of some combination of types.

If the mapping becomes difficult, all you need to do is throw
in some secret types that no one knows about and charge what
you need for them! If 55 aircraft come to only $25B, then
you only need throw in the BS-99 Aurora-Orion disc hovercraft
with plasma stealth and quad laser canons. Cost? A nifty
$75B per copy (which is why there just ain't many that anyone
knows about).

We're in anti-US, conspiro-whacko land here! Historical
record, fact and logic are useless in this place.


SMH


SMH

From: Stephen Harding


If the mapping becomes difficult, all you need to do is throw
in some secret types that no one knows about and charge what
you need for them! If 55 aircraft come to only $25B, then
you only need throw in the BS-99 Aurora-Orion disc hovercraft
with plasma stealth and quad laser canons. Cost? A nifty
$75B per copy (which is why there just ain't many that anyone
knows about).

We're in anti-US, conspiro-whacko land here! Historical
record, fact and logic are useless in this place.


SMH


Actually the price went up about $1billion since the aircrews insisted on cup
holders.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

B2431 wrote:

From: Stephen Harding

If the mapping becomes difficult, all you need to do is throw
in some secret types that no one knows about and charge what
you need for them! If 55 aircraft come to only $25B, then
you only need throw in the BS-99 Aurora-Orion disc hovercraft
with plasma stealth and quad laser canons. Cost? A nifty
$75B per copy (which is why there just ain't many that anyone
knows about).

Actually the price went up about $1billion since the aircrews insisted on cup
holders.

Happy troops are effective troops, so what the hey!


SMH

Personally, I'd much rather have $1T in "lost" stuff, due to the guys in the
field taking the initiative and moving stuff around where it's needed,
versus having warehouses full of well-accounted-for stuff that is too much
trouble for folks to requisition.

In article ,
(Michael Petukhov) wrote:

What's a point compare incomparables?
It lets people ignore the real issues.