A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Grob 109



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 13th 19, 02:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 699
Default Grob 109

On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 00:21:15 -0700, sbaircraft wrote:

Its frankly not a very good airplane and not a very good glider. I'm not
sure what your intentions and expectations are, but I think that most
people would be better off buying a Cessna 150 and/or a Libelle.

I've seen that from the other side - I once met a G109 under a nice big
cloud while flying my H201 Libelle and hugely outclimbed it without
really trying. At the time I put that down the the 109 belonging to an
Air Cadet squadron and quite possibly being flown by the cadet.


--
Martin | martin at
Gregorie | gregorie dot org
  #2  
Old September 14th 08, 06:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
BT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 995
Default Grob 109

underpowered for departures on hot high density altitude days..
so part of the question will be.. where will you be doing most of your
flying.
around Whidbey .. most likely not a problem..
at Max GW in the Nevada or southern California desert at 2-4pm.. may not be
a good idea

BT

"Brien" wrote in message
om...
Thinking of buying a 109A need to know the good the bad and the ugly of
it. Just what do I need to know about it, I have had people say stay away
from it others say it is good if you know how to fly it ?



  #3  
Old September 14th 08, 11:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Gilbert Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Grob 109

"Brien" wrote:

Thinking of buying a 109A need to know the good the bad and the ugly of it.
Just what do I need to know about it, I have had people say stay away from
it others say it is good if you know how to fly it ?


The wing section is much thicker on the 109A, and pretty poor IMHO.
The A will spin of a 50kt turn, and don't ever think of attempting a
take-off with water on the wings. I saw one go through the upwind
boundary because the under surface got wet from the grass.

It has a 2 litre Limbach engine, while the 109B has 2.5 litre.
  #4  
Old September 15th 08, 03:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jeplane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 72
Default Grob 109

I have over 800 hours in motorgliders, half of that in the G109.

Here is the scoop:

- Grob is no longer represented in the US. Parts availability is
starting to be a problem.

- It's not a good power plane (probably the performance of a C152) and
it's not a good glider either. (heavy and glider ratio of 27)

- Over density altitude of 7000', forget it. You will scare yourself,
and must be ready for slow climb, using thermals to get up. Had to do
that at the end of the runway once, which kind of stopped anybody
behind me from departing...

- You MUST sign to the G109 Yahoo list, where all the G109 and G109B's
owners are trying too help themselves with maintenance, tips,
pictures, etc...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/G109_P...ec=group&slk=1

- The canopy in the first model (there is no A model per say) is a
pain in the butt. Lot of them have cracked as results. This was
corrected in the B model which has two doors instead.

- Taxiing in the first model is also something to get used to. This is
different in the B I understand, although I've never flown it.

- You can't beat using only 4G/hr, and you can soar quite some
distances. I flew from Vegas to the Lake Powell once, a 6 hrs flight
only using the engine 2 hrs. Pretty amazing and fun!

- Never put yourself so low that if the engine does not start, you are
going to crash land it somewhere. It is still a glider after all, not
a get out of jail card.

- Once the engine has restarted airborne, plan on losing another 1500'
before you can move the throttle forward. Just a technique, but one
which will preserve cylinder temps.

- In case of an engine failure on take-off, you will be able to come
back to the runway from 300'AGL. This assumes gross weight, near sea
level, no wind. Practice first at altitude, or with an experienced
CFI.

- In the pattern, you will be wearing two hats: T/O like a power pilot
with your left hand on the stick, right hand on the throttle. From
half downwind, change your hat to a glider pilot, throttle idle, with
left hand on the airbrakes, and right hand on the stick!
Different mentality. If you are already rated in airplanes, this
should be an easy transition. Otherwise.... Well, it's good training
anyway...:-)

Motorgliders are definitely fun, and I've had some good flights in
them, but the Grob is a different animal as it is getting old, and
maintaining them are going to be challenging...
  #5  
Old September 15th 08, 02:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Vaughn Simon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 735
Default Grob 109


"jeplane" wrote in message
...
Motorgliders are definitely fun, and I've had some good flights in
them, but the Grob is a different animal as it is getting old, and
maintaining them are going to be challenging...


Perhaps 15 years ago, we had a G109 at our local field. I was lucky enough
to use it for the first few hours of my glider flight training. On the surface,
a motorglider seems like a wonderful idea. It is a glider (sort of) and as a
power plane it cruises faster than a 152 on much less gas. The reality was not
so great.

In the year that I knew it, the engine was off several times, twice for major
work (they are notorious for burned valves) and at least once to simply replace
the generator belt (yes, you have to remove the engine to do that). It once
suffered a prop strike in a bad landing and sat for over three months waiting on
prop parts from Germany.

It barely had enough power to taxi on grass. The technique to start it
rolling was to apply full throttle and then fan the rudder to sort of jar the
thing into motion. A push from a bystander was a much better option if
available. Once in motion, it was OK.

All-in-all, my impression was it might still be an OK plane for a careful,
mechanically-inclined owner, but you must go into the deal understanding its
limitations.


--
Vaughn

.................................................. .......
Nothing personal, but if you are posting through Google Groups I may not receive
your message. Google refuses to control the flood of spam messages originating
in their system, so on any given day I may or may not have Google blocked. Try
a real NNTP server & news reader program and you will never go back. All you
need is access to an NNTP server (AKA "news server") and a news reader program.
You probably already have a news reader program in your computer (Hint: Outlook
Express). Assuming that your Usenet needs are modest, use
http://news.aioe.org/ for free and/or http://www.teranews.com/ for a one-time
$3.95 setup fee.
.................................................. ........

Will poofread for food.




  #6  
Old April 12th 16, 03:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Robert M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Grob 109

On Sunday, September 14, 2008 at 8:35:28 PM UTC-6, jeplane wrote:

Here is the scoop:

- Grob is no longer represented in the US. Parts availability is
starting to be a problem.


Grob gliders and motorgliders are not orphans.

I represent both Grob Aerospace, who support both models of the G-109 and Fiberglas-Technik Rudolf Lindner who supports the G-102, G-103 and G-104 gliders and selflaunch gliders.

Grob Aerospace has a friendly customer support lady who has been very helpful in making sure I order the correct parts for customers and getting them out the door quickly.

Lindner has provided wonderful support the the 102, 103 and 104. Almost every part customers have needed have been available off the shelve. Including canopies.

I am authorized to repair all Grob models mentioned above.

Motors for the 109s is an issue. Almost all owners I speak to want more power. The problem comes when thinking about alternative motors for a U.S. Type Certificated aircraft. I know of no reasonable priced alternatives but if some one comes up with a viable option and has the money to make it happen I'll help in any way I can.

Robert Mudd
A&P, I.A. Commercial and CFI for Gliders and Airplanes, Single and MEL
Composite Aircraft Repair LLC
Moriarty, New Mexico USA








  #7  
Old September 19th 17, 09:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Grob 109

Robert,

As I recently purchased a Grob 109a, this thread popped up when I searched for parts.

If you still have access to parts I'd love to talk to you; actually I'll talk to anyone with parts availability.

Thanks, Dan
914dan.senecal at GMail dot com
  #8  
Old September 23rd 17, 11:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Grob 109

Dan
I own a G-109A in eastern Tennessee.
I have had great response from contacting grob directly, the service rep I have worked with is Kim, e-mail below.
Jarmer Kim
If you are associated with a club mention it, I received a club discount from them.
bob





  #9  
Old April 30th 19, 07:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Grob 109

On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 13:29:00 UTC-7, wrote:
Robert,

As I recently purchased a Grob 109a, this thread popped up when I searched for parts.

If you still have access to parts I'd love to talk to you; actually I'll talk to anyone with parts availability.

Thanks, Dan
914dan.senecal at GMail dot com


Dan I have a 109 that I am parting out. If you need anything let me know. No wings engine or prop. Great leather seats and most of the control linkage.
instruments and radios being tested. DAVE San Francisco 415 563-4803
  #10  
Old September 16th 08, 10:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Hellman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default Grob 109

On Sep 14, 7:02*am, "Brien" wrote:
Thinking of buying a 109A need to know the good the bad and the ugly of it.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grob Bob O'Rilley Soaring 3 April 29th 05 07:22 PM
Grob G-102 maintenance Stephen Szikora Soaring 4 November 25th 04 09:49 AM
Grob 103 SL R.W. Carpenter Soaring 2 March 21st 04 10:21 PM
WTB Grob 109 b Steve B Soaring 10 July 21st 03 06:54 PM
GROB 102 Vorsanger1 Soaring 4 July 11th 03 11:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.