A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

757 avionics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old October 3rd 08, 07:17 PM posted to aus.aviation,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default 757 avionics

On 3 Okt, 18:32, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in news:71a42f98-fbdf-4249-ba94-33ac4f4ecfe9@
64g2000hsm.googlegroups.com:



On 3 Okt, 17:46, "Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message


...


some questions if anyone knows the answers...


A better question is...


Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?


Ahem... by no means the same question, and I can assure you I'm not
one of Ducky's sockpuppets. He looked up a wiki article on the 757
FMCS and decided it meant that the 757 was FBW.


And you looked up a wiki article on "graveyard turns" and stuck your head
up your ass for all time.

Bertie


Quite possibly. But it still strikes me as unlikely that one coudl get
into a situation whereby one was convinced one was in level flight
whilst in a turn if they could see the horizon..
  #4  
Old October 3rd 08, 05:39 PM posted to aus.aviation,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 573
Default 757 avionics

wrote in message
...
On 3 Okt, 17:46, "Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message

...

some questions if anyone knows the answers...


A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?


Ahem... by no means the same question, and I can assure you I'm not
one of Ducky's sockpuppets. He looked up a wiki article on the 757
FMCS and decided it meant that the 757 was FBW.


Both of you asked the same question no less than 2 hours apart. Are you a
liar or just to dumb to read his post?

Either you're a sockpuppet or you're his designated ****** for the day. I'm
not sure which is worse really.

  #5  
Old October 3rd 08, 07:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default 757 avionics

On 3 Okt, 18:39, "Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
wrote in message

...

On 3 Okt, 17:46, "Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message


...


some questions if anyone knows the answers...


A better question is...


Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?


Ahem... by no means the same question, and I can assure you I'm not
one of Ducky's sockpuppets. He looked up a wiki article on the 757
FMCS and decided it meant that the 757 was FBW.


Both of you asked the same question no less than 2 hours apart.


I was first! Nyah!

*Are you a liar or just to dumb to read his post?


See above...


Either you're a sockpuppet or you're his designated ****** for the day. *I'm
not sure which is worse really.


I'm MY designated ****** for today, thank you veh much.


  #6  
Old October 3rd 08, 07:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 573
Default 757 avionics

wrote in message
...
On 3 Okt, 18:39, "Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
wrote in message

...

On 3 Okt, 17:46, "Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message


...


some questions if anyone knows the answers...


A better question is...


Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?


Ahem... by no means the same question, and I can assure you I'm not
one of Ducky's sockpuppets. He looked up a wiki article on the 757
FMCS and decided it meant that the 757 was FBW.


Both of you asked the same question no less than 2 hours apart.


I was first! Nyah!


That just makes you the wankee.

  #7  
Old October 8th 08, 11:59 AM posted to aus.aviation,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Qanset
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default 757 avionics

Mike wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...


A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?


Why cant you answer the question in a more civilised manner, than being
a smartarse???
  #8  
Old October 8th 08, 01:17 PM posted to aus.aviation,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 573
Default 757 avionics

"Qanset" wrote in message
...
Mike wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...


A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?


Why cant you answer the question in a more civilised manner, than being a
smartarse???


Probably because I have no interest in engaging in a discussion with a
tin-foil hat kook who knows as much about aviation as a pig knows about
Sunday.

But I'm sure we could all learn a thing or two from you about civilized
retorts, eh?

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.a...c16872a0ae13e6

  #9  
Old October 10th 08, 11:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default 757 avionics


"Qanset" wrote

Why cant you answer the question in a more civilised manner, than being a
smartarse???


I thought that was more civilized answer that the questioning party
deserved. Of course, no answer would have been even more civilized, and was
exactly what was deserved.
--
Jim in NC



  #10  
Old October 10th 08, 08:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.disasters.aviation
Bertie the Bunyip[_28_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 481
Default 757 avionics

"Morgans" wrote in
:


"Qanset" wrote

Why cant you answer the question in a more civilised manner, than
being a smartarse???


I thought that was more civilized answer that the questioning party
deserved. Of course, no answer would have been even more civilized,
and was exactly what was deserved.


And of course, you couldn't answer it anyway, so your reply is just jerking
off in public, ain't it?


Bertie
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Avionics Help Aero Dana Piloting 9 February 11th 06 04:08 AM
Used Avionics Jon Kraus Owning 18 October 18th 05 09:59 PM
Ew Avionics Jean-Paul BERRY Soaring 1 March 8th 05 10:37 AM
Used Avionics O. Sami Saydjari Instrument Flight Rules 40 December 2nd 03 02:53 PM
F-8 avionics Zajcevi Military Aviation 0 August 20th 03 11:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.