![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 18, 10:54*am, "Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote:
"bildan" wrote in message ... OK, the bike's prove you can take motorcycle 4 cyl blocks and create a monsterously powerful multi-bank engine with them. *The Hyabusa V8 is particularly neat. *The 48 clinder seems to be 2- stroke cylinders which is weird. For aviation, a big, round, mean, screaming, 1000HP radial would take the show. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- But it doesn't tell you if these hybrids are reliable. There are a lot more issues with building a custom engine than just making all the pieces fit together. None of these examples have been tested for long periods of time at 75% power, and if they won't withstand such, they serve little purpose other than exhibition. It would just be for exhibition and racing. Just put it on a trailer and show up at airshows and wow the crowds by running it. The first flight would be in an unlimited racer. By way of comparison, the old WW2 engines aren't all that reliable by modern standards anyway. This thing should be just as reliable. I can't see an engine like this anywhere other than in an exhibition and racing aircraft. All that said, the superbike engines are bulletproof by reputation - they get run really hard. The top end is where most engine failures occur and that part has been thoroughly tested - tens of thousands have been built and sold. The crank, rods, case and accessories would be what needs testing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Jan, 16:14, bildan wrote:
I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. *They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. *Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. *Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. *You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. *Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) *planetary gear set in the nose case. *I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. *I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Here is a proper V8 made using 2 x suzuki hyabusa engine blocks and heads. It is properly engineered and gives twice the power of the original - say 350hp. If memory serves me correctly the power is taken off of a gear at the centre of the crank on the original and the V8 is likely the same. http://flickr.com/photos/10983301@N06/3068124763/ If you want more maybe a turbine should be considered ![]() http://www.pistonheads.com/roadtests/RadicalSR8.htm some description here with weight and power. Says £20,000 ready to run. Was built for car racing. There have been a number of similar projects I understand. google [radical v8] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Jan, 21:22, bod43 wrote:
On 17 Jan, 16:14, bildan wrote: I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. *They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. *Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. *Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. *You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. *Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) *planetary gear set in the nose case. *I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. *I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Here is a proper V8 made using 2 x suzuki hyabusa engine blocks and heads. It is properly engineered and gives twice the power of the original - say 350hp. If memory serves me correctly the power is taken off of a gear at the centre of the crank on the original and the V8 is likely the same. Looks like the centre drive take off comment was rubbish - probably ![]() Here is another one. http://www.h1v8.com/albums/album_ima...06/1363744.htm The web site is quite informative. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, bildan wrote: I've been kicking this idea around with some mechanical engineers for a couple of years. Motorcycle in-line fours are state of the art high performance engines unencumbered by smog controls. They get more than 100HP per liter with some at 140 HP/liter. Of course, they rev like a dentist's drill. More importantly, the cylinder/head assembly just bolts to the crankcase. Now, think of 7 or 9 of these in-line water cooled 4-cyl blocks arranged radially around a common crankcase. To make it work, you have to make the case, crank and new master/ articulating connecting rods. You'd also need a gear case to drive the cam chains. Finally, you'd need some serious gear reduction (~7:1) planetary gear set in the nose case. I'd also use an aircraft- type fuel injection system instead of carbs. If it worked, in the case of 9 cylinder blocks, you'd have a 36 cylinder, 500 pound, 30" diameter, 1000HP+ liquid cooled radial reminiscent of a half scale Lycoming XR7755. Now build a slick little carbon composite airplane around the monster and take it to Reno. I'll bet the sound alone would wow the crowds. Take a look at this: http://www.hartleyenterprises.citymax.com/page/page/1562069.htm 400hp from an engine weighing just 200lb. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:14:43 -0800 (PST), bildan
wrote: In Europe quite a lot of aircraft are flying with BMW 2 cylinder motorcycle-engines. Reliable, good power weight ratio With a reduction from http://www.takeoff-ul.de/ Our plane is a Cherry BX2 homebuilt from Switserland. regards, Rob |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:35:26 GMT, (Zier & van de
Steenoven) wrote: Our plane is a Cherry BX2 homebuilt from Switserland. The Youtube video on our Dutch Homebuilt Site www.nvav.nl shows this plane!!! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zier & van de Steenoven wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:14:43 -0800 (PST), bildan wrote: In Europe quite a lot of aircraft are flying with BMW 2 cylinder motorcycle-engines. Reliable, good power weight ratio With a reduction from http://www.takeoff-ul.de/ Our plane is a Cherry BX2 homebuilt from Switserland. regards, Rob My, that Boxer does look pretty. Is there an English language version of that site, I wonder? Or, if not, how much? how heavy? how many horses? Brian W |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:08:07 -0600, Brian Whatcott
wrote: My, that Boxer does look pretty. Is there an English language version of that site, I wonder? Or, if not, how much? how heavy? how many horses? Brian W Try this; http://www.spang-air.de/willkommen/B...mw_engine.html On this site you will find a lot of information about BMW engines. The owner Wolfgang Spang has lived in the US. He can answer in English! regards, Rob -- Papa Hotel Victor India November And http://www.takeoff-ul.de -- Produkte -- http://www.takeoff-ul.de/pdf%27s/Des...ne_02-2006.pdf |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soooo, what is the best plane to build around a corvair engine? | Lou | Home Built | 21 | November 11th 06 12:56 AM |
Real Time to build an RV10 | [email protected] | Home Built | 13 | October 31st 05 02:20 AM |
My 9th Wedding Anniversary Trip, To Newport, OR Carb Ice & Real Engine Out "Long" | NW_PILOT | Piloting | 32 | June 28th 04 11:45 PM |
RV Quick Build build times... | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | December 17th 03 03:29 AM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |