PHOTOS: PHL - May 02, 2009

"Digital Voices" wrote in message
...
I tried that for awhile, but Irksome then wanted something else, then
something else..........

You've never attached images to your spam links. If you did, it wouldn't be
spam (as long as the images were on-topic).

All you do is resort to name calling. You and the leetroll.

On Sun, 3 May 2009 17:19:36 -0400, Alan Erskine wrote
(in article ):

"Digital Voices" wrote in message
...
I tried that for awhile, but Irksome then wanted something else, then
something else..........

You've never attached images to your spam links. If you did, it wouldn't be
spam (as long as the images were on-topic).

All you do is resort to name calling. You and the leetroll.

You've said that you've killfiled him, so how would you know?

And, btw, Alan-me-lad, have you ever got around to reporting me for 'forging'
my headers? Didn't think so.

On Sun, 3 May 2009 19:28:57 +0100, Digital Voices wrote
(in article ):

I - and I'm sure others here - would appreciate it and I reckon everybody
would win. Or am I missing something?


I tried that for awhile, but Irksome then wanted something else, then
something else..........

My apologies - I'm afraid I didn't express myself very clearly.

I wasn't suggesting that you somehow yield to what Alan Erskine may or may
not want: I wasn't getting myself involved in that.

Rather I was trying to say that the group as a whole would benefit if you
were to attach a sample picture to each of your posts. I - and I am sure
others - would appreciate it.

Equally, your web site would almost certainly benefit from increased traffic
as people here were exposed to your work.

It looks like win-win to me.

I don't have the time. It's either this or nothing.

I'm surprised you say that. I used to post the occasional picture here and I
always found that typing out the accompanying text took longer; attaching a
picture to the post was a simple matter of drag, drop and let the software do
the rest.

The link points to binary aviation pictures...hmm, wow, the name of
this group.

I'm not sure what you mean by this: my understanding is that the word
'binaries' in the usenet context refers to files attached to posts in
newsgroups (but I may well be wrong).

"Alan Erskine" wrote in
:

"Digital Voices" wrote in message
...
I tried that for awhile, but Irksome then wanted something else, then
something else..........

You've never attached images to your spam links. If you did, it
wouldn't be spam (as long as the images were on-topic).

All you do is resort to name calling. You and the leetroll.




And not to let an opportunity pass...

Hey pedoperv!

How is yo' grandbaby doing?