If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
Someone wrote,,
So, you were just an SP (e.g: AF cop?) Now that explains a LOT! Reminds me of the time some pompous jackass SP who was publically chewing out a mechanic at the front gate simply for having a bit of grease on his uniform. Now I don't know what world you come from, but i can assure you that a greasy uniform on a maitenance troop was the last thing any cops that i worked with would ever worry about. Dan may not have been a "full blown" SP, but i was for 10 yrs in SAC. I've sen uniforms on mechanics that were so black they didn't even look like uniforms and not once did any SP that I ever HEARD of got bent because of that. Now on the other hand, you enter the restricted area or violate a no lone zone and you'd have a whole new definition oh hurt!!! Jim SAC COP 78-88 |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Marron wrote: Thank you. I rest my case. I'm so relieved! |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:18:29 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
"Mike Marron" wrote in message .. . Of course not. A preemptive strike "wherever terrorists hide, or run, or plan" (e.g: Afghanistan, Indonesia, Iraq, etc. etc...) Right. Kill all the terrorists before they can commit terror. Yup, that's what the Air Force shoulda done. Yep, and they should have prevented that ENRON thing too. :-) |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:02:11 GMT, Mike Marron wrote:
(OXMORON1) wrote: [snip] The whole intelligence community was screwed up and the only good that I see from 9/11 is posibly the system will be cleaned up in the future. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the USAF an integral part of the intelligence community? If yes, then doesn't the USAF share the blame for 9/11? The USAF is NOT, rpt NOT an integral part of the intelligence community. Buy a clue Al Minyard |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:38:41 GMT, Mike Marron wrote:
Dave Holford wrote: Mike Marron wrote: A preemptive strike, perhaps? Recall the Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear powerplant near Baghdad back in 1981. On where - Florida where they were taking pilot training? Of course not. A preemptive strike "wherever terrorists hide, or run, or plan" (e.g: Afghanistan, Indonesia, Iraq, etc. etc...) Oh, now I get it, we should have killed every Moslem in the world!! And Germany, France and the UK because terrorist cells existed in those countries!! Al Minyard |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:22:09 GMT, Mike Marron wrote:
(B2431) wrote: Mike Marron wrote: Coming from someone whose stupidly wasted more bandwidth than all of us combined swapping drivel with Tarver over such inane things as "pitot tubes" and such, THAT was a truly mind boggling retort! And as far as your buddy Beaman is concerned, well, he's a self-admitted Tarver apologist. Pot Kettle Black. Marion, please pay attention. Yes I did argue ad nauseum with tarver but I never stooped to his level of name calling,personal attacks and vulgarity. You have. As if. As if being a santimonious hypocrite somehow lets you off the hook. And I s'pose politely using a clinical term for "cajones" is a "crime" or a "sin" in your book as well? That is the tactic of one who is either losing an argument or has no argument to begin with. I stand by everything I wrote, Big Dan. And you do know the difference between having an argument and expressing an opinion, correct? Your opinion in this matter is so juvenile and patently wrong that it does not rise to the level of intelligent discourse. Please go away. Al Minyard |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
"Chad Irby" wrote The 6" diameter arrestor cables for the B-52N were also a bit of a problem, and were a pain to clear. Not to mention the three tailhooks and how they were fitted to the fuselage, which reduced the bombload and occasionally got caught on trees in low-level flight. Apparently, waveoffs were also an 'intersting' experience. Pete |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Pete" wrote: "Chad Irby" wrote The 6" diameter arrestor cables for the B-52N were also a bit of a problem, and were a pain to clear. Not to mention the three tailhooks and how they were fitted to the fuselage, which reduced the bombload and occasionally got caught on trees in low-level flight. Apparently, waveoffs were also an 'intersting' experience. Well, they weren't so much "waveoffs' as "waveoh****s!" -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
|
#200
|
|||
|
|||
Chad Irby wrote:
In article , "Pete" wrote: "Chad Irby" wrote The 6" diameter arrestor cables for the B-52N were also a bit of a problem, and were a pain to clear. Not to mention the three tailhooks and how they were fitted to the fuselage, which reduced the bombload and occasionally got caught on trees in low-level flight. Apparently, waveoffs were also an 'intersting' experience. Well, they weren't so much "waveoffs' as "waveoh****s!" Closely followed by "D U C K ! !" delivered at 150 db -- -Gord. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More drug allegations made, By USAF in Italy | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 23rd 03 11:31 PM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |
USAF Fighter-Attack SPO members from the 1980s? | R Haskin | Military Aviation | 0 | September 20th 03 12:06 PM |
USAF squadrons in 1985 | Bob Martin | Military Aviation | 4 | September 9th 03 05:46 PM |
FS Books USAF, Navy, Marine pilots and planes | Ken Insch | Military Aviation | 0 | July 20th 03 02:36 AM |