A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NATCA Going Down in Flames



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old September 5th 06, 03:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

Do you understand you'd also have to remain clear of Class B, C, and D
airspace?


He's in Iowa. They don't have alphabet airspace there. g

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #192  
Old September 5th 06, 03:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
B A R R Y[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 178
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

Matt Barrow wrote:

I remember the media pictures of the controllers on strike in 1981, dressed
like crap, while picketing. It sure didn't lend them any credibility.


There's a picket line dress code? G

In a past life, I spent some time picketing, and I thought you were
supposed to look poor.

A nice suit and a Beemer don't usually do much for public support during
a work stoppage.
  #193  
Old September 5th 06, 03:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Montblack[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

("Jay Honeck" wrote)
Hee hee! We've discussed clothing-optional dress codes, here at the inn,
but we ultimately decided that (sadly) most of our guests look better with
clothes on.

Some more than others...



HEY!!!


Montblack
Heading to IOW (in a few hours) to drop off OSH gear.

  #194  
Old September 5th 06, 03:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
om...

"Private" wrote in message
news:n76Lg.516413$IK3.107547@pd7tw1no...

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...

In the end, the point isn't what I like, or what you like -- it's what
the employer likes. If the FAA decides that it wants you to wear polka
dot clown suits every day, so be it.


I will wear whatever my employer wishes, provided they also provide it.


In that case you quite likely would find yourself pursuing other
opportunities.

I require my project managers to wear slacks and at least a "golf" type
shirt when meeting clients/contractors in their offices. When entertaining
them in a restaurant, for example, a suit/sport coat and tie are mandatory.

I haven't had to buy anyone a suit yet, and I doubt I ever will.



  #195  
Old September 5th 06, 03:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames



Larry Dighera wrote:


It was under the old agreement, which expired. We were not under any
contract after that.



Why not? Surely NATCA members are working under an agreement between
the union and the FAA.


No. It expired.

  #196  
Old September 5th 06, 03:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Montblack[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

wrote)
One can clearly see who is a union member, and who is not, thats for
sure..



http://www.yale.edu/terc/democracy/m...ges/Strike.jpg
My older sister painted this red fist image (no words) on her window shade
one summer - probably 1969. I was nine.

It was the 'age of' ...poster paint. :-)


Montblack
Dad got promoted to a management possition with the railroad, before I was
born, but still maintained his Union membership with monthly dues - until
the day he retired.

  #197  
Old September 5th 06, 03:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


"B A R R Y" wrote in message
m...
Matt Barrow wrote:

I remember the media pictures of the controllers on strike in 1981,
dressed like crap, while picketing. It sure didn't lend them any
credibility.


There's a picket line dress code? G

In a past life, I spent some time picketing, and I thought you were
supposed to look poor.


For those outside aviation, do you think these guys looking like outright
bums instilled confidence that these bozos are the ones keeping the skies
safe?

A nice suit and a Beemer don't usually do much for public support during a
work stoppage.


They were light years removed from "nice suits". And their demeanor sure
didn't do them any favors either.




  #198  
Old September 5th 06, 03:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message

So management's power trumps collective bargaining for government
employees. Terrific. :-(


Not only for government employees, but for all employees -- but only under
certain specified conditions. I was quoting from Newps, who, iirc, is in
ATC and presumably ought to know these things regarding the issue in
question:

Perfectly legal in this case. The previous contract expired quite a
while ago. Negotiations broke down. The way federal law is written FAA
may impose their contract subject to approval by Congress. Congress
approved by not taking up the issue.


Procedures re labor law and negotiation are clearly specified. I got the
impression you're a union guy, too, Larry. Why aren't you up on these
details? I've been involved in unions and union elections several times
through my life. The rules are all there. You may not like them, and they
may sometimes seem slanted, convoluted, or bizarre, but they are there. All
you have to do is look it up.


  #199  
Old September 5th 06, 03:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" wrote:


If the FAA can't even dictate a ban on flip flops in the workplace
without generating a union uproar (and open insubordination), the FAA
is irretrievably broken and *should* be privatized. What a shame it's
come to this.


Or the union has outlived its usefullness.

Assuming, of course, it was useful to begin with.

Don't think so.


  #200  
Old September 5th 06, 03:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Montblack[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default POL NATCA Going Down in Flames

("Emily" wrote)
Unions have nothing to do with government. A union levels the playing
field, which otherwise is skewed towards the employer.


But what's wrong with that? Granted, I have a great employer, but
employers aren't evil.



What's wrong with a boss grabbing some young thing's ta-ta's, in his office,
in exchange for not firing her?

Start with the Homestead Strike and work your way up to... 'your boss is not
allowed to grab your ta-ta's, in exchange for not firing you.'

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carnegie/peopleevents/pande04.html


Montblack

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An ACE goes down in flames. PoBoy Naval Aviation 25 December 9th 05 01:30 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 139 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Piloting 133 November 12th 03 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.