Awesome moonscape

On Jan 13, 10:16 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
On Jan 13, 2:49 am, WingFlaps wrote:



On Jan 11, 11:45 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
...
I was informed in the early 1970's a tanker of DDT
spilled into the ocean could kill all life in Earth's
oceans, now that's a cheap "doomsday weapon".
The death is presumed to cascade to land animals.
I have my doubts.
Therefore, respecting science, I'm taking up a
collection to perform this experiment, with the
intent to disprove it.
I think this is a chance for all good enviromentalist
to come and contribute to our cause, to once and
for all, dismiss that ill founded rumor.
Regards
Ken

LOL! HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERS KENNY!!!

Hey there's a writers strike, I'm writing my own stuff.
Apparently White house writers are on strike too,
" we should have bombed Aushwitz to save lives".
You know WW2 USAAF bombing accuracy, they
would have dug a moat all around Aushwitz.
Ken

Wife and I are arguing....
I figure "A bridge Too Far" + "Hogan's Heros's"
+ Patton + HH, then Battle of Bulge + HH.

She thinks we should drop the HH's and put in
"Bridge on the River Kwia", as a WW2 docu-drama.
Duh.....William Holden vs Bob Crane, Crane wins.

I'll respect reponses that support my side, to be fair.
Ken

On Jan 13, 2:34 am, WingFlaps wrote:
On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth wrote:



On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

wrote in news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
:

On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" wrote:
BradGuthwrote:

Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of everything NASA,
Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?

Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead loads of
smut
crapolla?

Is there a little something to worry about, especially since thus
far
JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of anything
NASA/Apollo?

Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together: "(Venus
is
ahoax.)"

I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's hard at
work.

- Brad Guth

That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.

MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage units or
archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon most everything in
sight or out of sight, yet somehow their having lost track of all 700
of those essential NASA/Apolloboxes of audio, video and endless
streams of their mission critical and science data. Gee whiz, no
wonder our government can so continually lie, deny and manage to get
away with it, just like it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY
fiasco, and is still doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war
that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage to
provoke the living crapolla out of those other mostly innocent
Muslims.

I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.

Wow, that was almost coherent.

Almost.

Bertie

BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?

It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough or
hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
electrostatic dusty moon.

Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty, in
focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given in full
and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most everything
should. Guess our moon landings were simply too insignificant or
perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been informed.
- Brad Guth

Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope. But
that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand
on them.

6574178373


Please do expand away. Blow it out your infowar and infomercial
spewing ass for all we care.

I believe it's called "put up or shut up".

- Brad Guth

On Jan 13, 12:36 pm, WingFlaps wrote:
On Jan 14, 2:26 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:



WingFlaps wrote :

On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

wrote in news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
:

On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" wrote:
BradGuthwrote:

Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of everything
NASA,

Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?

Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead loads
of
smut
crapolla?

Is there a little something to worry about, especially since
thus
far
JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of
anything

NASA/Apollo?

Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
"(Venus
is
ahoax.)"

I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's
hard at

work.

- Brad Guth

That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.

MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage units
or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon most
everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their having
lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apolloboxes of
audio, video and endless streams of their mission critical and
science data. Gee whiz, no wonder our government can so
continually lie, deny and manage to get away with it, just like
it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still
doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war

that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage to
provoke the living crapolla out of those other mostly innocent
Muslims.

I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.

Wow, that was almost coherent.

Almost.

Bertie

BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?

It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough or
hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
electrostatic dusty moon.

Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty, in
focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given in
full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most
everything should. Guess our moon landings were simply too
insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been
informed. - Brad Guth

Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope. But
that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not expand
on them.

6574178373

Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.

Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a dust
'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander engines (I
can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is in the public
domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to be seen directly,
the fact that these objects are where they should be seems to add a
lot of credence to the idea that the missions took place. Add that to
the photographs and samples and it's not looking good for the
conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly gray, you just
have to look at it... I've carried out image processing on my moon
pictures and the saturation of the colors is not zero but very close
to it so you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the
gray surface..

6205987182

Post that image, and knock our dumbfounded socks off, or simply post
something of those JAXA Selene images of at least ten fold better
resolution to start off with.

And besides, which one of those has anything to do with folks having
walked on our physically dark and nasty moon?

- Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote in
:

On Jan 13, 12:36 pm, WingFlaps wrote:
On Jan 14, 2:26 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:



WingFlaps wrote
innews:93325fa0-52e6-46c8-85f1-
legroups
.com:

On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

wrote in
news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
:

On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" wrote:
BradGuthwrote:

Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
everything NASA,

Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?

Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
loads of
smut
crapolla?

Is there a little something to worry about, especially
since thus
far
JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf
of anything

NASA/Apollo?

Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
"(Venus
is
ahoax.)"

I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology
that's hard at

work.

- Brad Guth

That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.

MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon
most everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their
having lost track of all 700 of those essential
NASA/Apolloboxes of audio, video and endless streams of
their mission critical and science data. Gee whiz, no
wonder our government can so continually lie, deny and
manage to get away with it, just like it did for so long
over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still doing about TWA
flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war

that's going WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage
to provoke the living crapolla out of those other mostly
innocent Muslims.

I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.

Wow, that was almost coherent.

Almost.

Bertie

BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?

It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright
enough or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically
dark and electrostatic dusty moon.

Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather
nifty, in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even
if given in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish
as most everything should. Guess our moon landings were simply
too insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've
been informed. - Brad Guth

Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed
byapollo missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting
telescope. But that would get in the way of you conspiracy
fantasy so I'll not expand on them.

6574178373

Really? What are they? I've often wondered about that.

Hi Bertie, the first are laser reflectors and the second is a dust
'scar' where the surface dust was disturbed by the lander engines (I
can't remember which mission tho' but the picture is in the public
domain). While the lander(s) is(are) too small to be seen directly,
the fact that these objects are where they should be seems to add a
lot of credence to the idea that the missions took place. Add that to
the photographs and samples and it's not looking good for the
conspiracy theorists. As for the moon not being mostly gray, you just
have to look at it... I've carried out image processing on my moon
pictures and the saturation of the colors is not zero but very close
to it so you have to boost color contrast a lot to see hues in the
gray surface..

6205987182

Post that image, and knock our dumbfounded socks off, or simply post
something of those JAXA Selene images of at least ten fold better
resolution to start off with.

Why? It's gaurunteed to not make the slightest bit of difference to your
"view" ( for want of a better word) so why should anyone bother?

And besides, which one of those has anything to do with folks having
walked on our physically dark and nasty moon?

See? told you so. You haven;'t even seen it yet, fruitcake boi.

Bertie

BradGuth wrote in
:

On Jan 13, 2:34 am, WingFlaps wrote:
On Jan 10, 5:07 am, BradGuth wrote:



On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

wrote in
news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
:

On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" wrote:
BradGuthwrote:

Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
everything NASA,
Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?

Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
loads of
smut
crapolla?

Is there a little something to worry about, especially since
thus
far
JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of
anything NASA/Apollo?

Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
"(Venus
is
ahoax.)"

I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's
hard at work.

- Brad Guth

That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.

MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon most
everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their having
lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apolloboxes of
audio, video and endless streams of their mission critical and
science data. Gee whiz, no wonder our government can so
continually lie, deny and manage to get away with it, just like
it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still
doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war that's going
WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage to provoke the
living crapolla out of those other mostly innocent Muslims.

I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.

Wow, that was almost coherent.

Almost.

Bertie

BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?

It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough
or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
electrostatic dusty moon.

Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty,
in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given
in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most
everything should. Guess our moon landings were simply too
insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been
informed. - Brad Guth

Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope. But
that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not
expand on them.

6574178373


Please do expand away. Blow it out your infowar and infomercial
spewing ass for all we care.

I believe it's called "put up or shut up



Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the moon and
got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants, you'd still deny it.

It's because you're a k00k!

Bertie

On Jan 13, 1:16 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:

Hey there's a writers strike, I'm writing my own stuff.
No wonder your "stuff" sucks so hard.

Skip the writing - try chrome plating Q/C at a trailer hitch factory.

On Jan 13, 10:24 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :



On Jan 13, 2:34 am, WingFlaps wrote:
On Jan 10, 5:07 wrote:

On Jan 8, 11:59 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

wrote in
news:784e0a1f-169e-4e37-a316-
:

On Jan 8, 11:29 am, "Mr. Smith" wrote:
BradGuthwrote:

Why is your Usenet into such extensive purgings of
everything NASA,
Apollo, moon landing andhoaxworthy as fast as they can?

Why are the stuffing the Usenet topic index with instead
loads of
smut
crapolla?

Is there a little something to worry about, especially since
thus
far
JAXA's Selene can't muster up one lousy pixel on behalf of
anything NASA/Apollo?

Why did you feel the need to run "a" and "hoax" together:
"(Venus
is
ahoax.)"

I smell another spook or a mole of MI5/CIA ****ology that's
hard at work.

- Brad Guth

That's it guys he's on to us. Let's go get him.

MI5/CIA~DoD with their multi-hundred petabyte data storage
units or archiving nodes, that's spying and recording upon most
everything in sight or out of sight, yet somehow their having
lost track of all 700 of those essential NASA/Apolloboxes of
audio, video and endless streams of their mission critical and
science data. Gee whiz, no wonder our government can so
continually lie, deny and manage to get away with it, just like
it did for so long over the USS LIBERTY fiasco, and is still
doing about TWA flight 800, 9/11 and the Iraq war that's going
WWIII postal into Iran as soon as we can manage to provoke the
living crapolla out of those other mostly innocent Muslims.

I guess we're trying to put Hitler's body count to shame.

Wow, that was almost coherent.

Almost.

Bertie

BTW, where's that one JAXA Selene pixel of anything NASA/Apollo?

It's not that our 'right stuff' wasn't large enough, bright enough
or hadn't seriously messed up acres of that physically dark and
electrostatic dusty moon.

Those 3D images of 10 meters per pixel are actually rather nifty,
in focus and not likely excluding much of anything, even if given
in full and uncorrected color looking as though bluish as most
everything should. Guess our moon landings were simply too
insignificant or perhaps didn't happen to the extent we've been
informed. - Brad Guth

Actually there are at least two objects on the moon placed byapollo
missions that can be detected on earth or by orbiting telescope. But
that would get in the way of you conspiracy fantasy so I'll not
expand on them.

6574178373

Please do expand away. Blow it out your infowar and infomercial
spewing ass for all we care.

I believe it's called "put up or shut up

Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the moon and
got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants, you'd still deny it.

It's because you're a k00k!

Bertie

But I just said that it would matter, because I wouldn't deny such
peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws of
physics.

Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?
- Brad Guth

On Jan 13, 10:22 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
Post that image, and knock our dumbfounded socks off, or simply post
something of those JAXA Selene images of at least ten fold better
resolution to start off with.

Why? It's gaurunteed to not make the slightest bit of difference to your
"view" ( for want of a better word) so why should anyone bother?


And besides, which one of those has anything to do with folks having
walked on our physically dark and nasty moon?

See? told you so. You haven;'t even seen it yet, fruitcake boi.

Bertie

So, clearly you don't actually have that or any other such image to
share and share alike. Sounds like you're a born-again liar, just
like our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).

- Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote in news:bd059b70-590d-49d2-a03f-
:

On Jan 13, 10:22 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
Post that image, and knock our dumbfounded socks off, or simply post
something of those JAXA Selene images of at least ten fold better
resolution to start off with.

Why? It's gaurunteed to not make the slightest bit of difference to your
"view" ( for want of a better word) so why should anyone bother?


And besides, which one of those has anything to do with folks having
walked on our physically dark and nasty moon?

See? told you so. You haven;'t even seen it yet, fruitcake boi.

Bertie

So, clearly you don't actually have that or any other such image to
share and share alike. Sounds like you're a born-again liar, just
like our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).

You're talking to the wrong poster k00kie boi. I never claimed to have any
such image.



Bertie

BradGuth wrote in
:




Wouldn't matter. If you were transported to the surface of the moon
and got to lick the hull of one of the lander remnants, you'd still
deny it.

It's because you're a k00k!

Bertie

But I just said that it would matter,

No, you didn't. see above.



because I wouldn't deny such
peer replicated science as based upon those pesky regular laws of
physics.

You have a big future in creationism.....

Are we having another bad Usenet day, Bertie?

Nope.