Thrown out of an FBO...

mike regish wrote:

Huh?

mike

"Jessica Taylor" wrote in message
...

"Bigot! You never ___! You said ____! Bigot! You haven't spent time in
the
midwes to hear that it's full of bigots!"


Sorry to confuse you, that should say 'midwest.'

Newps wrote:




Peter Duniho wrote:



No. To support a blanket generalization, one needs to survey the entire
population.




One needs to do no such thing. Not even remotely close. You can
accurately make a blanket generalization of 300 million people with a
sample of less than 1000.

Depends on your definition of accurate. And it depends on what you are
generalizing about the population. If the characteristic you are
generalizing isn't normally distributed or doesn't fit some other known
distribution, then you sample tells you next to nothing.


Matt

In article ,
"mike regish" wrote:

Said like a true latent homosexual...

feel the love people!

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

"Jessica Taylor" wrote in message
...
I believe that the Constitutional process should actually be followed
instead of
trampled on.

The constitution is being followed. Adjourning the constitutional convention
was lawfully accomplished by a vote of the legislature. Parliamentary
maneuvering has always been a routine part of the constitutional process.

Massachusetts' gay marriage is supported by the majority of the state's
population and all three branches of government (when the governor-elect
takes office). Elections have been held since same-sex marriage began, and
the number of legislators supporting equal marriage rights has increased,
not decreased. The democratic process is working just as it should here to
protect equal rights under the law.

So if another Court says that same sexes cannot marry, that would be true
democracy too, right?

No, just as the Dred Scott decision was not an example of true democracy.
Court decisions in a democracy are *supposed to* protect individual and
minority rights against tyranny of the majority, but they do not always do
so.

--Gary

Ok. You win.

mike

"Jessica Taylor" wrote in message
...

That would be hard to do when there is nothing to google for. You made
the
statement, you cannot support it with facts, and your only defense is to
tell
someone else to try supporting your statement.

Well, at least I didn't call a charter owner a cheap SOB employer.

mike

"Jessica Taylor" wrote in message
...
mike regish wrote:

There's the key word...Evolve.

You're using it on a person who is incapable of evolving. It scares him,
so
he'd rather keep things the same for as long as possible.

How 'liberal' of you. Just spew out personal insults and ad-hominem
attacks.
Maybe then they could become true, you don't need any facts.

Look in the mirror.

mike

"Jessica Taylor" wrote in message
...
mike regish wrote:

Used to be, I could talk to anybody-even a republican.

Since Bush Jr., as soon as sombody declares themselves a republican, the
conversation's over. That's one thing I really thank Bush Jr. for. He's
made
it crystal clear what his party's about.

Apparently what his party's about is getting you to show your true colors:
such
powerful narrow-minded intolerance for others that have other points of
view
that you cannot even communicate.

I know. He just exposed them. They've always been like that. They just hid
it better.
mike

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

George Bush didn't magically change all Republicans, or even the party,
all by himself in the span of 6 years.

Matt

Hope I didn't get any on you.

Or...do I?

mike

"Jessica Taylor" wrote in message
...

And of course the most irrational is the one who like to spew out the
bigotry/racist claims.

Again...huh?

mike

Sorry to confuse you, that should say 'midwest.'