If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#281
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
swag writes:
Can you set an autopilot to do a 60 degree bank angle turn? Mine won't do that. It depends on the autopilot. On large aircraft you can, although they usually won't go to 60 degrees. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#282
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
On Apr 17, 5:09 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: Air does not behave very much like an imcompressible fluid at low air speeds. Not even close. That's not what the engineers say. Maybe only the ones that drives locomotives. Under some conditions, low air speeds is one of them, air can be treated like it is an imcompressible fluid. Obviously air, being a gas, can be compressed, but taking that into account at low speeds greatly complicates the calculations, and the final result isn't significantly different. Duh. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#283
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
Actually, there is a liquid formula that deep sea divers can breathe.
Flourine something or other. But you can breathe water, too. You only get to inhale once, though. mike wrote in message ... In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote: And no, it is not possible to breathe water, you can only breathe gases, if you want to be pendantically, semantically correct. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#284
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
Actually, he doesn't.
mike "rq3" wrote in message . net... Anthony, you've got the issue of compressibility precisely backwards. No surprise. Rip |
#285
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
Again, actually he doesn't.
mike "rq3" wrote in message et... Anthony, my boy, your interpretation is incorrect. At Mach, the air has compressed as much as it can, which is why it takes so much energy to force a solid object through Mach. You have the concepts reversed in your head. Rip If you look in books on aerodynamics, you'll find that air is effectively an incompressible fluid at low speeds, such as those encountered in small aircraft. It isn't until you get to the transonic range that compression starts to be an issue, and the rules change substantially at and beyond the speed of sound. |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
"Rip" wrote Tim, get with the program, man. Mxsmanic has never flown anything other than Microsoft Flight Simulator. Seriously. That's what we are talking about. Even in MSFS you can see the effect of flying back through your own turbulence when doing a proper 360. BDS |
#287
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
|
#288
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
It is not acceleration. It is speed. GPS travels much faster than we do. I
doubt we have clocks accurate enough to measure the relativistic effects at our speeds. And climbing has nothing to do with relativity. mike "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... writes: Duh. The clock on your aircraft runs slower as you accelerate, due to relativistic effects. But then it also runs faster as you climb, again due to relativistic effects. Do you take these effects into account in your on-board calculations? [And while they may be trivial for aircraft, they are not in all cases--the GPS has to be adjusted for these effects to maintain accuracy, for example.] -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#289
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
On Apr 17, 11:39 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
swag writes: Can you set an autopilot to do a 60 degree bank angle turn? Mine won't do that. It depends on the autopilot. On large aircraft you can, although they usually won't go to 60 degrees. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. so didyou when you did your "test flight?" You won't encounter a bump from wake turbulence unless you are doing a steep turn ( like 45 degree bank angle which should take 19 seconds to go 360) |
#290
|
|||
|
|||
Question to Mxmanic
Mxsmanic wrote:
Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you cannot catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can be broken, I'm listening. Nope. If you've completed a 360 turn, and you're at the same altitude (within a few feet), you wil go over it. The first time you do it yourself (not your smartass CFI that can just do it as if it were easy) it's pretty great. Kind of like running over a dog in a car, not hard like a speed bump, but soft and squishy. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no | gasman | Soaring | 0 | August 26th 05 06:39 PM |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |