If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: 40,000 Plus Hits. Thank you all.
From: (MLenoch) Date: 11/1/03 6:25 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Mike Marron wrote:When Ed said Kramer was guilty of "demeaning the whole warrior ethic," the "Autocollimator" person subsequently responded: That's weird. Especially when Ed gives Art credit in his recent book. Just make me think. Does Mike have a wife , girlfriend or even a life? Any kids on the way? You can draw your own conclusions about these questions. VL I have the highest respect for Ed and his performance in combat for the service to our country. .And I think everyone knows that. Well almost everyone. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
(ArtKramr) wrote:
I have the highest respect for Ed and his performance in combat for the service to our country. .And I think everyone knows that. Well almost everyone. Like your "Autocollimator" alter ego? Now, you may have successfully BSed everyone else Kramer (or "Autocollimator" or whatever else you're calling yourself these days) but you haven't BSed me. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I keep waiting to see if Mike can offer direct proof of what he insists is the
truth - In my dealing with Art, he's always been honest - I can't imagine why he'd puppet although stranger things have happened. But this isn't really about Art or what he may/may not have done - its about how truly argumentative you have been in RAM, Mike. I think most of the posters here have their share of testosterone, but only one person seems to be splashing it all over the screen. In the relatively short time you've been posting on RAM, I haven't seen you trying to get along with, or show respect to anyone. Its ok to be full of yourself, but eventually, you will have argued yourself out of an audience. All of us on RAM have our faults, but it looks like your primary input here is in the form of inflammitory remarks against people who don't know you from Adam. A lot of us have been posting to RAM for years and we don't go cracking on "newbies" to the group, but you seem to be going out of your way to make a bad impression. Gordon ...an AOLer that thinks your comments about my ISP is just plain silly - should I look down on you for picking a car I don't particularly approve of..? ISP insults are about as lame as it gets, Mike, and it gives the impression you are simply looking for another reason to take a shot at passing strangers. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
(Gordon) wrote:
I keep waiting to see if Mike can offer direct proof of what he insists is the truth - In my dealing with Art, he's always been honest - I can't imagine why he'd puppet although stranger things have happened. Call it a gift, Gordon. Some of us are simply blessed with built-in BS detectors and I can smell Kramer masquerading as "Autocollimator" from a mile away. Now, I don't know you from Adam either but I do know that Kramer has his sycophantic band of followers and supporters around here who simply don't can't bear the thought of thier WW2 "hero" stooping so low as to post under an alias. You can attempt to change the subject, rationalize, and counterattack all you want, but so far nobody has offerred any proof that "Autocollimator" is NOT Kramer. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Kearton"
wrote: "Gordon" wrote in message ... An AOLer by any other name.... Like me, Mike? I worked for AOL back in the 1990s and amassed a gigantic account of free access time, so I still use it. I happen to like AOL, for no other reason than I know the interface like the backside of Britney Spears. Gordon Is that some sort of crack ? Cheers Dave Kearton Yes butt not in the usual sense... -- -Gord. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Marron" wrote in message ... You can attempt to change the subject, rationalize, and counterattack all you want, but so far nobody has offerred any proof that "Autocollimator" is NOT Kramer. Ah HA!!! Now we're getting somewhere......SCIENCE!!!! I can DEAL with SCIENCE!!!!!!!:-)) Let's see....there's a parallel in here somewhere........I know, I have it.......wait a second while my wife brings me a Jack Daniels so I can give this my undivided attention !!! After having my JD and making a few notations.......... When Eienstien was asked what an atom looked like, he pondered the question a moment and answered, " Science sometimes deals with elimination to arrive at substance and conclusion. One can't actually describe the physical appearance of an atom to the degree that one can say without fear of contradiction that the physical appearance of the atom is definitely NOT that of a pussy cat!!" So now that YOU have allied your deductive reasoning with that of Einstein, we can begin to use your logic in reaching our conclusion about Arthur. Since Art's physical appearance doesn't resemble an atom or a pussy cat, can we now assume that unless he can prove he is Art, that he is in fact Autocollimator? Or if Art is Autocollimator, can we assume that Art has a pussy cat......Ah HA!!! A pussy cat named "atom" perhaps? But someone has already postulated that Art and Autocollimator come from two different location paths. Can this be? One would think that two personalities so similar as you say would be cohabitating to say the least. Using Occam's Razor, I'm theorizing here that the constant in this equation is "pussycats" I therefore postulate to you that if Art can say to this newsgroup without qualification that he either owns or doesn't own a pussycat named "atom" and you Mike Marron, CAN'T prove that Autocoillimator indeed does or doesn't own a pussycat named "atom"......your theory about Art and Autocollimator is flawed. While you people work on this, I'm going to have another JD and see if I can find our cat, who is suddenly missing, after looking at the computer screen with total disgust as I was writing this, and then suddenly running off somewhere with my wife!! Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Dudley Henriques" wrote:
"Mike Marron" wrote: You can attempt to change the subject, rationalize, and counterattack all you want, but so far nobody has offerred any proof that "Autocollimator" is NOT Kramer. Ah HA!!! Now we're getting somewhere......SCIENCE!!!! I can DEAL with SCIENCE!!!!!!!:-)) Let's see....there's a parallel in here somewhere........I know, I have it.......wait a second while my wife brings me a Jack Daniels so I can give this my undivided attention !!! After having my JD and making a few notations.......... When Eienstien was asked what an atom looked like, he pondered the question a moment and answered, " Science sometimes deals with elimination to arrive at substance and conclusion. One can't actually describe the physical appearance of an atom to the degree that one can say without fear of contradiction that the physical appearance of the atom is definitely NOT that of a pussy cat!!" So now that YOU have allied your deductive reasoning with that of Einstein, we can begin to use your logic in reaching our conclusion about Arthur. Since Art's physical appearance doesn't resemble an atom or a pussy cat, can we now assume that unless he can prove he is Art, that he is in fact Autocollimator? Or if Art is Autocollimator, can we assume that Art has a pussy cat......Ah HA!!! A pussy cat named "atom" perhaps? But someone has already postulated that Art and Autocollimator come from two different location paths. Can this be? One would think that two personalities so similar as you say would be cohabitating to say the least. Using Occam's Razor, I'm theorizing here that the constant in this equation is "pussycats" I therefore postulate to you that if Art can say to this newsgroup without qualification that he either owns or doesn't own a pussycat named "atom" and you Mike Marron, CAN'T prove that Autocoillimator indeed does or doesn't own a pussycat named "atom"......your theory about Art and Autocollimator is flawed. While you people work on this, I'm going to have another JD and see if I can find our cat, who is suddenly missing, after looking at the computer screen with total disgust as I was writing this, and then suddenly running off somewhere with my wife!! After wading thru your silly nonsense above you couldn't possibly be as thoroughly disgusted as me (you sure that's not laced "Autocollimator" KoolAid you're drinking instead of Jack Daniels?) Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt You forgot to include your Fellowship in the Flat Earth Society. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Marron" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" wrote: After wading thru your silly nonsense above.......... Exactly!! You're beginning to get it at last........NONESENSE!!!!! :-))) All the best, Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 10 | May 20th 04 10:12 PM |
Another cool RV hits the Rogue's Gallery! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 0 | January 4th 04 05:08 PM |
40,000 U$ Soldiers are Illegal Aliens, Drafted for Illegal War | Gordon | Military Aviation | 6 | September 7th 03 03:28 AM |