If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
"PeeCeeElf" wrote in message ... I've just posted to another forum on the subject. I think the Mythbusters demo was completely flawed and didn't address the question as it was originally asked. Of course the aircraft was going to fly given the nature of their experiment. How was the question originally asked? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
PeeCeeElf wrote in
: I've just posted to another forum on the subject. Well, if you;re loking for someone to agree with you then that's probably the best thing to do. Might I suggest alt.conpsiracy or alt.fluffy.bunnies? Bertie |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
PeeCeeElf,
didn't address the question as it was originally asked There is no way to ask the question without the aircraft taking off. The only difference is in the speed of the wheels. In one variant, it is twice that of a "stationary runway" situation, in the other it is infinite. In both cases, nothing keeps the aircraft from flying. Einstein had a hard time convincing people, too. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:
How was the question originally asked? Will be interesting to see "PeeCeeElf" says the "original" question was. I believe it was this variant though [1]: "A plane is standing on a runway that can move (some sort of band conveyer). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyer moves in the opposite direction. This conveyer has a control system that tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyer to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction). Can the plane take off?" But some versions use something like this: [Blah blah] "speed of wheels" [blah blah]. I suspect the debate in those version is over the meaning of "speed of wheels" which arguably can have two commonly used meanings: (1) Translational motion of the center axle of the wheel relative to the ground. (2) Rotational motion of the outer rim of the wheel relative to the wheel's axle. Of course (1) appears synonomous with saying "Can a plane take off if the conveyor belt moves at whatever speed it takes to keep the wheel's axle stationary relative to the ground?" or more briefly: "Can a plane take off if it is held stationary on the ground?" The problem with at least one variant that includes "speed of wheels" was covered by Cecil Adams TWO YEARS AGO: "However, some versions put matters this way: "The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation." This language leads to a paradox: If the plane moves forward at 5 MPH, then its wheels will do likewise, and the treadmill will go 5 MPH backward. But if the treadmill is going 5 MPH backward, then the wheels are really turning 10 MPH forward. But if the wheels are going 10 MPH forward . . . Soon the foolish have persuaded themselves that the treadmill must operate at infinite speed. Nonsense. The question thus stated asks the impossible -- simply put, that A = A + 5 -- and so cannot be framed in this way. Everything clear now? Maybe not. But believe this: The plane takes off." [1] [1] http://www.straightdope.com/columns/060203.html |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
Jim Logajan Wrote: "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: How was the question originally asked? Will be interesting to see "PeeCeeElf" says the "original" question was. I believe it was this variant though Something like that Jim. The way I see it is that the question causes more confusion than the inevitable outcome. Any way you look at it, the aircraft will fly. You could turn that treadmill over at virtually any speed and a little ultralight would probably blast off. I did have problems with the way the question was worded (originally) but I've cleared it up in my feeble mind. I'm Australian, and ya gotta talk a little s-l-o-w-e-r for us cobbers to understand what ya sayin'. It must be all that time I've spent flying inverted.. all the blood has rushed to my head -- PeeCeeElf Posted at www.flight.org |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
Dallas wrote:
In case you missed it, here's the segment on You Tube: http://youtube.com/watch?v=KSBFQOfas60&feature=related And yet, the debate continues. :- ( Dear God, let it end already. It's like that friend of mine who was convinced that if an airplane does a U-turn against a 40-knot headwind, it will stall and crash. As if wings are somehow aware of the planet beneath them. It's the same damn thing. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
"PeeCeeElf" wrote in message ... Jim Logajan Wrote: "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: How was the question originally asked? Will be interesting to see "PeeCeeElf" says the "original" question was. I believe it was this variant though Something like that Jim. The way I see it is that the question causes more confusion than the inevitable outcome. Any way you look at it, the aircraft will fly. You could turn that treadmill over at virtually any speed and a little ultralight would probably blast off. I did have problems with the way the question was worded (originally) but I've cleared it up in my feeble mind. I'm Australian, and ya gotta talk a little s-l-o-w-e-r for us cobbers to understand what ya sayin'. It must be all that time I've spent flying inverted.. all the blood has rushed to my head This whole thing is done and over the Mythbusters busted the myth that it wouldn't take off, can we PLEASE let it die! |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
To solve this puzzle, you need to ask how the control system works.
Method #1: A device attached to the vehicle monitors the speed of the wheels and transmits this to the conveyor belt's control system which runs the belt in the opposite direction at the same speed. Method #2: Some sort of position-detecting system observes the vehicle's position on the belt, and feeds back to a servo system that increases the belt's backwards speed if the vehicle starts making forward progress, or decreases it if the vehicle starts sliding backwards. (Someone want to propose a different control system?) Both systems are actually equivalent in their effects on automobiles and airplanes. An automobile is held in position no matter what the driver attempts to do. With airplanes, the situation is different. Because the plane has free-wheeling wheels, and doesn't depend on pushing against the belt in order to move forward, it begins to make progress. At this point, the belt -- which is a perfect conveyor belt -- instantly speeds up to infinite speed. The airplane's wheels -- which are perfect wheels -- likewise instantly spin up to infinite speed. Since the wheels are perfect and have no friction, the airplane is not affected and takes off anyway. If you don't assume perfect abstractions, then the answer depends on what happens first: Either a) the belt reaches its upper speed limit and the plane takes off, b) the plane's bearing seize and the plane is flung backwards off the belt, or c) the breeze caused by friction between the belt and the atmosphere is sufficient for the plane to take off before a) or b) happens. -- -Ed Falk, http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/ |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
In article ,
NEWS theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote: This whole thing is done and over the Mythbusters busted the myth that it wouldn't take off, can we PLEASE let it die! Actually, PeeCeeElf was correct; they didn't do the experiment right. The puzzle assumes some sort of feedback mechanism to keep the belt moving exactly at the opposite speed as the airplane. The mythbusters guys didn't do that. However, Cecil Adams is also right; it's not possible. Doing the test right assumes that you believe in A = A + 5. -- -Ed Falk, http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/ |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters airplane/treadmill video
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MythBusters airplane on a conveyor belt | Peter Clark | Piloting | 56 | February 3rd 08 10:05 PM |
Mythbusters/airplane/treadmill | Harry K | Home Built | 0 | January 25th 08 03:42 AM |
FYI: Dec 12 MythBusters: Airplane Hour | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 217 | December 21st 07 11:33 AM |
FYI: Dec 12 MythBusters: Airplane Hour | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 113 | December 16th 07 07:29 PM |
Airplane Taxies Into Car: Video Footage | Hans | Piloting | 10 | June 26th 06 02:06 AM |