If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
B2431 wrote:
snip It would be interesting to see what 2 carrier based task forces, assuming one carrier each, would have had on the outcome of the war. Had they existed before the war the Brits would have had to provideair cover in areas they didn't need to as was the case in the real war . I think very little commerce would have gotten through from the US. Man, do you want to go over to sci.military.naval (or rather Google Groups so you can catch up) and read the current thread "WI: Graf Zeppelin was commissioned"; there's close on 180 messages so far, analyzing the effect, british countermoves, production capacities, air group training, etc. ;-) Oh, and "A Different Z plan" might also be of interest. Guy |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Guy Alcala" wrote in message
. .. B2431 wrote: snip It would be interesting to see what 2 carrier based task forces, assuming one carrier each, would have had on the outcome of the war. Had they existed before the war the Brits would have had to provideair cover in areas they didn't need to as was the case in the real war . I think very little commerce would have gotten through from the US. Man, do you want to go over to sci.military.naval (or rather Google Groups so you can catch up) and read the current thread "WI: Graf Zeppelin was commissioned"; there's close on 180 messages so far, analyzing the effect, british countermoves, production capacities, air group training, etc. ;-) Oh, and "A Different Z plan" might also be of interest. Thanks, gentelemen, for your corrections. What I should have said was of course: "This was the regime that never *deployed* an aircraft carrier..." Comes to the same thing really; actually, like a lot of their later high-tec weaponry, it was a negative asset as it must have absorbed a lot of resources that could otherwise have been used better elsewhere. John |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Negraeff" wrote in message
om... (Dav1936531) wrote in message ... From: (Denyav) Do you think the great "sovietologist" Condoleeza Rice is living completely in the here and now? OT I know, but has anyone else on the NG enjoyed Steve Earle's great song about Mz Rice on his new album? If not, do. John |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
OK, I ask you again, besides what you and the other Nazi teuton have said
about this and other projects have you any verifiable proof from a source other than UFO sites? You keep telling us about "classified for 75 years" information only you and teuton know about and Well,the term UFO has been invented in US AFTER the occupation of Germany alone this fact should make you a little bit suspicious. The term used by Kammlers SS advanced weapons research and development directorate for such craft was SFOs (SonderFlugObjecten) not UFOs. Regarding classification of documents by Anglos and the lies told by Anglos there is a direct correlation as classification widely used to cover lies. One of the best examples of this is the lies of Gen.Groves. Gen.Groves attemped to explain sudden and unpredicted spike in US u-235 production in June 45 with improvements in uran production process. Even during hey days of Groves, his explanation met with remarkable sceptism from experts. But nobody could prove that he was lying,because total and plantwise u-235 production figures were among Americas best kept secrets. Now thanks to DOEs openness policy in 90s we all know that US production really spiked in June 45 but none of US facilities was responsible for the spike. Groves,knowing that the crucial information will remain classified during his lifetime,did not bother to to tell lies to public. Thats the way how world famous Anglo pragmatism works. how the Nazis manage to detonate 2 atomic bombs without anyone noticing or anyone involved writing about it. Any idea when you intend to provide verifiable proof? Both test were witnessed by hundreds of people second test on March 4 even by thousands of people,including almost whole populations of small towns near test site and even by an USAAF aircrew. Some of eyewitnesses have even appeared in TV programs in Germany and described what they saw on March 4. All eyewitnesses also said that the town people were interviewed by Americans (and later by Soviets) about the events of March 4,but interestingly there is no record of such interviews in declassified US archives. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Your Nazi regime wasn't in power 75 years ago.
First of all Anglos made the arrangements with Kammler,another perfect example of famous Anglo pragmatism. It was also the Anglos who put all documents connected with German advanced weapons development under lock for 75 years. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hamas Leader Rantisi Killed by Israeli Strike on Car | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 13 | April 21st 04 07:04 PM |
Joint Strike Fighter focus sparks concern | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 19th 04 09:19 PM |
Mother Russia closer to develop an ABM system | Alejandro Magno | Military Aviation | 11 | January 11th 04 06:06 PM |
Russian Military Technology | Alejandro Magno | Military Aviation | 137 | January 10th 04 12:21 AM |
Russia joins France and Germany | captain! | Military Aviation | 12 | September 9th 03 09:56 AM |