The LA UFO INVASION BATTLE?

The Battle of Los Angeles, also known as The Great Los Angeles Air Raid,
is the name given to a incident that occurred less than three months
after the United States entered World War II as a result of the Japanese
Imperial Navy¢s attack on Pearl Harbor. At that time Many un identified
flying objects entered the skies over Los Angeles California. These UFOS
were seen by millions. These UFOS became the target of the aerial
barrage as they were thought to be an attacking force from Japan.

What else were they to think ?

Amazing Photos and video of this event exist..This UFO incident might
offer us the best actual photographic proof?

http://youtu.be/Izzd3PPtRcw

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:08:58 -0400, Quaalude wrote:

The Battle of Los Angeles, also known as The Great Los Angeles Air Raid,
is the name given to a incident that occurred less than three months
after the United States entered World War II as a result of the Japanese
Imperial Navy¢s attack on Pearl Harbor. At that time Many un identified
flying objects entered the skies over Los Angeles California. These UFOS
were seen by millions. These UFOS became the target of the aerial
barrage as they were thought to be an attacking force from Japan.

What else were they to think ?

Amazing Photos and video of this event exist..This UFO incident might
offer us the best actual photographic proof?

http://youtu.be/Izzd3PPtRcw

It is very rare that among the annals of Ufology there should appear a
UFO case which involved military, duh, getting your ass kicked wasn't
kosher uintil 'Nam, yet is accompanied with actual photographic proof.

Such is the case of an event which took place over the Los Angeles area
on February 25, 1942. A giant UFO would actually hover over the city,
and be witnessed by hundreds of observers some of which died from the
absurd shelling of this extraterrestrial event.

Some felt it was a false alarm brought on by war hysteria. Steven
Spielberg used the episode as a basis for his WW2 comedy "1941."

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

Some felt it was a false alarm brought on by war hysteria.

Then they would have had to falsify the stunning videos and photos.
Don't think so but...

Tom wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

Some felt it was a false alarm brought on by war hysteria.

Then they would have had to falsify the stunning videos and photos.
Don't think so but...

And how many 'video' cameras do you think were around in 1942 ?

Fact is the beast that would be available to even a wealthy amateur
and most newsreel cinematographers was 16mm film. Film stock was
relatively expensive , especially in colour and film speeds were low.
Getting useful shots at night was well nigh impossible. Most of the
alleged film of night attacks in WW2 was faked afterwards.

If you see 'stunning' video from that period the chances are its faked.

Keith

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 22:26:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Tom wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

Some felt it was a false alarm brought on by war hysteria.

Then they would have had to falsify the stunning videos and photos.
Don't think so but...

And how many 'video' cameras do you think were around in 1942 ?

Good point. There were no motion picture films way back then. rolls
eyes

Fact is the beast that would be available to even a wealthy amateur
and most newsreel cinematographers was 16mm film. Film stock was
relatively expensive , especially in colour and film speeds were low.
Getting useful shots at night was well nigh impossible. Most of the
alleged film of night attacks in WW2 was faked afterwards.

If you see 'stunning' video from that period the chances are its faked.

Stunning is relative.

"Tom" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

Some felt it was a false alarm brought on by war hysteria.

Then they would have had to falsify the stunning videos and photos.
Don't think so but...

You don't think many of the people in Los Angeles (Hollywood) who owned
cameras would know how to create fake pictures???

Did you believe "King Kong"?

Hint: Double-expose Speed Graphic plates, or rewind and re-shoot roll film.
Shoot the UFO model or ghostly apparition first in the top of the frame
against an unlit black background so as not to expose the rest of the film.
The dupes can watch you expose the film (the second time) and take it to the
drugstore with 'no chance' to manipulate it.

jsw, once special-effects assistant to a filmmaker.

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:12:21 -0400, Jim Wilkins wrote:

"Tom" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

Some felt it was a false alarm brought on by war hysteria.

Then they would have had to falsify the stunning videos and photos.
Don't think so but...

You don't think many of the people in Los Angeles (Hollywood) who owned
cameras would know how to create fake pictures???

Do you? I never said that.

Did you believe "King Kong"?

Did you believe in "Independence Day"?

jsw, once special-effects assistant to a filmmaker.

Tom, reads with comprehension and doesn't shoot his mouth off indicating
he is a fool.

"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message
...

"Tom" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

Some felt it was a false alarm brought on by war hysteria.

Then they would have had to falsify the stunning videos and photos.
Don't think so but...

You don't think many of the people in Los Angeles (Hollywood) who owned
cameras would know how to create fake pictures???

Did you believe "King Kong"?

Hint: Double-expose Speed Graphic plates, or rewind and re-shoot roll
film. Shoot the UFO model or ghostly apparition first in the top of the
frame against an unlit black background so as not to expose the rest of
the film. The dupes can watch you expose the film (the second time) and
take it to the drugstore with 'no chance' to manipulate it.

jsw, once special-effects assistant to a filmmaker.
The only thing legit, was the Glen Millar background music ! bmc

In article , Tom wrote:

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

Some felt it was a false alarm brought on by war hysteria.

Then they would have had to falsify the stunning videos and photos.
Don't think so but...

Not much video being recorded in late 1941.