![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 21-Oct-2004, "Dahlin" wrote: I currently fly a 1969 140 and am considering buying an Arrow. Is there more leg room for rear passengers in the Arrow than the 140? Is there a difference in the pre 72 and post 72 Arrows with the longer fuselage as far as legroom. I'm tall and need the seat back which doesn't leave any leg room in the 140. I've been told the PA-28 line is all about the same but I have a hard time believing a true 4 seater would have as little leg room in back as the 140. I have an Arrow IV (1979 model), and I used to own a 1968 Cherokee 140, so I feel your pain. I have also flown in earlier model Arrows and Cherokee 180s. Early Arrows (pre Arrow II, i.e. before the 1973 model year), as well as Cherokee 180s of he same vintage, are somewhat limited in rear seat legroom, although they are certainly better in that regard than Cherokee 140s. However, Piper added 5 inches to the rear seat area with a fuselage stretch starting with the Arrow II. I believe other 4-place Cherokees (other than the 140) got the same stretch around the same time. Anyway, these more recent Arrows have quite adequate rear seat legroom. In ours, four adults can fly very comfortably. It should be noted that the front seats have more rearward travel than they really need -- well, maybe not for NBA centers -- and shoved all the way back they will encroach rather dramatically on rear seat legroom, but this is a pretty common feature of 4-place light airplanes -- and medium-sized cars, for that matter. -- -Elliott Drucker |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dahlin" wrote in message ...
I currently fly a 1969 140 and am considering buying an Arrow. Is there more leg room for rear passengers in the Arrow than the 140? Is there a difference in the pre 72 and post 72 Arrows with the longer fuselage as far as legroom. I'm tall and need the seat back which doesn't leave any leg room in the 140. I've been told the PA-28 line is all about the same but I have a hard time believing a true 4 seater would have as little leg room in back as the 140. My 1969 Cardinal has 14 inches(just measured it) from the front edge of the back seat to the back of the front seat with it adjusted for flight. I am 5'11" tall. There is plenty of room for children to sit in the floor and use the seat to play board games, as my niece and nephew have done this. Cardinal RG's have the same cabin dimensions. Cardinals are wide too. Beech Sundowners and Sierras are also very spacious inside. Regards, Bruce Cunningham N30464 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meting with a Lancaster rear gunner | Dave Eadsforth | Military Aviation | 12 | November 22nd 03 08:08 AM |
More long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids, with added nationalistic abuse (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 161 | September 25th 03 07:35 AM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |
Why not a Quad Tiltrotor Pusher-Puller? | Blair Maynard | Naval Aviation | 4 | July 2nd 03 07:52 AM |