![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message m... "Angus Davis" wrote in message ... Per the FARs, your gauges were functional. The only requirement is that when the tanks are empty, the gauges read empty. Sorry, the FARs don't say that. The FARs don't say anything about accuracy. The much misattributed FAR about them being empty just says that the E mark means zero usable. If they show full when the tanks are 1/4 full, that is not a problem in so far as the FARs are concerned. 91.205 says you must have operational guages. In this case the guage is NOT operating the way it was designed. If the thing is really bouncing between 0 and Full on the ground there is something seriously wrong. Not only is it hardly legal, I'd really question what was going on. Well, I'd certainly want to know why a gauge was flicking around, but being pedantic (as I would be if called on it by the FAA), how am I to know if my gauges are operational? For that, I'd go to my POH for guidance. My POH tells me that my fuel gauges should read 'red line' when there is no fuel in the tank. It says nothing else. So I'd argue that I could reasonably conclude my gauges were just fine if they showed full when in actual fact they were only 1/4 full. And since the FAR's insist I operate my plane consistently with the POH & flight supplements, I'd claim regulatory backing for this position. -- Dr. Tony Cox Citrus Controls Inc. e-mail: http://CitrusControls.com/ |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tony Cox" wrote in message
nk.net... Well, I'd certainly want to know why a gauge was flicking around, but being pedantic (as I would be if called on it by the FAA), how am I to know if my gauges are operational? Per the FAR, if they show the amount of fuel in the tank, they are operational. If they don't, they aren't. It's not rocket science. If you have gauges that show full tanks even when they are only 1/4 full, the gauges are not in compliance with the relevant regulation. For that, I'd go to my POH for guidance. My POH tells me that my fuel gauges should read 'red line' when there is no fuel in the tank. It says nothing else. Just because the POH only describes your "red line" for the zero fuel point, that doesn't mean there aren't additional requirements for accuracy. Pete |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
91.205 For VFR flight during the day, the following instruments and
equipment are required: (9) Fuel gauge indicating the quantity of fuel in each tank. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/c...4cfr91_00.html "Angus Davis" wrote in message ... Yossarian wrote: I understand that functional fuel gauges are required equipment for day VFR flight. Per the FARs, your gauges were functional. The only requirement is that when the tanks are empty, the gauges read empty. If they show full when the tanks are 1/4 full, that is not a problem in so far as the FARs are concerned. Repeating, the only regulatory requirement is for gauges to be accurate when the tanks are empty. That's why you should pay little attention to them at all, and do your fuel calculations with diligence. -angus |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have heard this repeated for quite a while, and I can't find the pertinent
section of the aircraft certification regs. Would you mind posting the chapter and verse where I can find this requirement? Jim The only requirement is that -when the tanks are empty, the gauges read empty. If they show full when -the tanks are 1/4 full, that is not a problem in so far as the FARs are -concerned. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim Weir" wrote in message news ![]() I have heard this repeated for quite a while, and I can't find the pertinent section of the aircraft certification regs. Would you mind posting the chapter and verse where I can find this requirement? Jim It doesn't say that. 23.1337 says the guage must be calibrated (but doesn't give any specific accuracy). The part that people keep passing around by is the (1), but they ignore the fact that it comes after "In Addition" . The empty pronouncement just says that the bottom mark is supposed to be zero usable as opposed to bone dry: (b) Fuel quantity indication. There must be a means to indicate to the flightcrew members the quantity of usable fuel in each tank during flight. An indicator calibrated in appropriate units and clearly marked to indicate those units must be used. In addition: (1) Each fuel quantity indicator must be calibrated to read "zero" during level flight when the quantity of fuel remaining in the tank is equal to the unusable fuel supply determined under § 23.959(a); |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Angus Davis wrote: Per the FARs, your gauges were functional. The only requirement is that when the tanks are empty, the gauges read empty. That's not true. The FARs require that the gauges "show the quantity of fuel in each tank". If that gauge reads 1/4 tank when the tank is full, it's not showing the quantity in the tank. George Patterson They say nothing's certain except death and taxes. The thing is, death doesn't get worse every time Congress goes into session. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's only requirement is that it reads empty when the tank is empty. Got a
watch? That's a hell of a lot better gas gage than that thing on the panel. mike regish "Yossarian" wrote in message . .. I understand that functional fuel gauges are required equipment for day VFR flight. Yesterday during my preflight in a 172 I saw that the right gauge was functioning intermittently--it would show full, flicker down to zero, bounce around, etc. Tank was visually confirmed full. Mechanic messed around with it for a while to no effect. Would you fly this airplane? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
mike regish wrote: It's only requirement is that it reads empty when the tank is empty. Nope. The requirement is that the gauge show the quantity of fuel in the tank. George Patterson They say nothing's certain except death and taxes. The thing is, death doesn't get worse every time Congress goes into session. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Yossarian
wrote: I understand that functional fuel gauges are required equipment for day VFR flight. Yesterday during my preflight in a 172 I saw that the right gauge was functioning intermittently--it would show full, flicker down to zero, bounce around, etc. Tank was visually confirmed full. Mechanic messed around with it for a while to no effect. I believe certification only requires that the gauge show empty when the tank is empty. Would you fly this airplane? If you have visually checked the fuel quantity and know approximately what your fuel burn is, (you do fly by your watch don't you?) you should be good to go. I was going to say that my Champ doesn't have a gauge, but then I remembered there is and I think it is off a Model A Ford. Of course, in a Cub it is just a wire in a cork sticking up through the cap. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"EDR" wrote in message ... I believe certification only requires that the gauge show empty when the tank is empty. You keep saying this, but it's not true. Of course, in a Cub it is just a wire in a cork sticking up through the cap. Works better than a lot of gauges... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 06:07 PM |
| Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 27th 04 12:24 AM |
| Progress on Flying Car | Steve Dufour | General Aviation | 5 | December 19th 03 04:48 PM |
| FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 01:07 AM |
| the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 08:41 PM |