A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Denver Terminal Area Chart Question - BVR vor/dme



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 4th 04, 03:49 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Crap... all this discussion about trying to find out what radial to fly..

1) draw the dang line on the chart.. through your VOR if you must "fly the
radial"
2) plant your trusty plotter on the line and measure the TC heading to fly..
3) look at the magnetic variation lines and apply the correction
accordingly..
4) go fly...

enough already
BT

"Robert Easton" wrote in message
...
Does anybody know why on the Denver Terminal Area Chart, the Byers (BVR
113.5) vor/dme facility is charted without the compass ring that are on

most
vortacs? It's the only one I've seen charted like this. Byers is located
33NM on the 090 radial of DVV (the Denver International Vortac).

Thanks, Robert




  #2  
Old February 4th 04, 04:10 AM
Geoffrey Barnes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Crap... all this discussion about trying to find out what radial to fly..

1) draw the dang line on the chart.. through your VOR if you must "fly the
radial"
2) plant your trusty plotter on the line and measure the TC heading to

fly..
3) look at the magnetic variation lines and apply the correction
accordingly..
4) go fly...


But, as I said in the original post, the VORs in this area have not been
adjusted for years now, and the declination used in them is not the same as
the magnetic variation lines on any current charts. Thus the radial setting
is not the same as the magnetic course, and is not the same as the true
course. They are somewhere in the middle.


  #3  
Old February 4th 04, 04:17 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Geoffrey Barnes wrote:

But, as I said in the original post, the VORs in this area have not been
adjusted for years now, and the declination used in them is not the same as
the magnetic variation lines on any current charts.


And as I said in my post, it won't be off enough to matter.

George Patterson
Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable
either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances
under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more
often to the physician than to the patient.
  #4  
Old February 4th 04, 04:51 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks George...

after 30 years of flying.. TLAR navigation still works.. even with 20 yrs of
that in high speed military aircraft.. you refine it as you get closer...

BT

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Geoffrey Barnes wrote:

But, as I said in the original post, the VORs in this area have not been
adjusted for years now, and the declination used in them is not the same

as
the magnetic variation lines on any current charts.


And as I said in my post, it won't be off enough to matter.

George Patterson
Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is

curable
either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the

circumstances
under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but

more
often to the physician than to the patient.



  #5  
Old February 4th 04, 04:50 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

and for this chap.. do you honestly think that 2 or 3 degrees is going to
make a difference?? what ever happened to pilotage
BT

"Geoffrey Barnes" wrote in message
ink.net...
Crap... all this discussion about trying to find out what radial to

fly..

1) draw the dang line on the chart.. through your VOR if you must "fly

the
radial"
2) plant your trusty plotter on the line and measure the TC heading to

fly..
3) look at the magnetic variation lines and apply the correction
accordingly..
4) go fly...


But, as I said in the original post, the VORs in this area have not been
adjusted for years now, and the declination used in them is not the same

as
the magnetic variation lines on any current charts. Thus the radial

setting
is not the same as the magnetic course, and is not the same as the true
course. They are somewhere in the middle.




  #6  
Old February 4th 04, 07:05 AM
Geoffrey Barnes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

and for this chap.. do you honestly think that 2 or 3 degrees is going to
make a difference?? what ever happened to pilotage


.... sigh...

I'm a student pilot, for crying out loud! I have no idea if 2 or 3 degress
will make a difference. Over a long distance, I suppose it could, but I
really don't have enough experience to know. I'm just trying to learn
something here. That's why I asked the question.

Little did I suspect that I would get jumped on for doing so. Just how on
earth is anyone supposed to learn if they get told off and insulted just for
asking a question? Jeez! The strange thing is that I always have enjoyed
reading the replies you make to other people, and I've even learned a few
things from you in doing so. I really expected better from you, mate. You
disappoint me.

I'm guessing from your reply that it really wouldn't make that much of a
difference. Surely you could have told me that without throwing in a few
destructive comments on my lack of pilotage skills. For the record, my
pilotage skills probably suck. I'm working on them, just like I'm working
on crosswind landingings, steep turns, and everything else. But just like
all my other skills, they probably suck. I already knew that, but thanks
ever so much for confirming it.

:: wanders off, mumbling something about the dismal future of general
aviation, and the uselessness of usenet ::


  #7  
Old February 4th 04, 01:22 PM
Dennis O'Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Geoffrey, cool it old chap...
OK, as a student lets talk about degrees... A pilotage trick is in knowing
that if you change the angle by one degree, lets say to the left, you will
be left of your desired track by 1 nm after you fly 60 nm.. (1 in 60 rule)
If it is 2 degrees then you will be off to the left by 2 nm...
And with shorter distances for a 2 degree change, you will be to the left by
1 nm in half the distance (30 miles) and left of track by a half nm in 15
miles... So if a B airspace is 30 nm across and you start out with a 2
degree error you will be off your desired track by one half mile when you
reach the center... Unless the vfr tunnel is very narow, wind drift will be
a bigger factor than heading error...

This rule comes from hundreds of years of ship navigation... Do a google on
the term "navigation 1 in 60 rule" and you should get hundreds of hits...
See, not that difficult to visualize once you have some numbers to go by...
denny
"Geoffrey Barnes" wrote in ... sigh...

I'm a student pilot, for crying out loud! I have no idea if 2 or 3

degress
will make a difference.



  #8  
Old February 4th 04, 03:05 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Geoffrey Barnes wrote:

I have no idea if 2 or 3 degress will make a difference.


Did you manage to get out of high school? Do you remember any of the math they
were supposed to teach you? You can use simple math to determine that your deviation
in a 20 mile leg is about 1/4 mile for each degree of variation from the proper
heading.

George Patterson
Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable
either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances
under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more
often to the physician than to the patient.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This week's AW&ST: apparently THAAD will have some ABM (as in anti- *ICBM*) capability. Scott Ferrin Military Aviation 29 August 31st 04 04:20 AM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Enroute chart question.. chris priest Instrument Flight Rules 0 August 10th 04 01:05 AM
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII Mike Yared Military Aviation 4 October 30th 03 03:09 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.