![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crap... all this discussion about trying to find out what radial to fly..
1) draw the dang line on the chart.. through your VOR if you must "fly the radial" 2) plant your trusty plotter on the line and measure the TC heading to fly.. 3) look at the magnetic variation lines and apply the correction accordingly.. 4) go fly... enough already BT "Robert Easton" wrote in message ... Does anybody know why on the Denver Terminal Area Chart, the Byers (BVR 113.5) vor/dme facility is charted without the compass ring that are on most vortacs? It's the only one I've seen charted like this. Byers is located 33NM on the 090 radial of DVV (the Denver International Vortac). Thanks, Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crap... all this discussion about trying to find out what radial to fly..
1) draw the dang line on the chart.. through your VOR if you must "fly the radial" 2) plant your trusty plotter on the line and measure the TC heading to fly.. 3) look at the magnetic variation lines and apply the correction accordingly.. 4) go fly... But, as I said in the original post, the VORs in this area have not been adjusted for years now, and the declination used in them is not the same as the magnetic variation lines on any current charts. Thus the radial setting is not the same as the magnetic course, and is not the same as the true course. They are somewhere in the middle. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Geoffrey Barnes wrote: But, as I said in the original post, the VORs in this area have not been adjusted for years now, and the declination used in them is not the same as the magnetic variation lines on any current charts. And as I said in my post, it won't be off enough to matter. George Patterson Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more often to the physician than to the patient. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks George...
after 30 years of flying.. TLAR navigation still works.. even with 20 yrs of that in high speed military aircraft.. you refine it as you get closer... BT "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Geoffrey Barnes wrote: But, as I said in the original post, the VORs in this area have not been adjusted for years now, and the declination used in them is not the same as the magnetic variation lines on any current charts. And as I said in my post, it won't be off enough to matter. George Patterson Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more often to the physician than to the patient. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and for this chap.. do you honestly think that 2 or 3 degrees is going to
make a difference?? what ever happened to pilotage BT "Geoffrey Barnes" wrote in message ink.net... Crap... all this discussion about trying to find out what radial to fly.. 1) draw the dang line on the chart.. through your VOR if you must "fly the radial" 2) plant your trusty plotter on the line and measure the TC heading to fly.. 3) look at the magnetic variation lines and apply the correction accordingly.. 4) go fly... But, as I said in the original post, the VORs in this area have not been adjusted for years now, and the declination used in them is not the same as the magnetic variation lines on any current charts. Thus the radial setting is not the same as the magnetic course, and is not the same as the true course. They are somewhere in the middle. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and for this chap.. do you honestly think that 2 or 3 degrees is going to
make a difference?? what ever happened to pilotage .... sigh... I'm a student pilot, for crying out loud! I have no idea if 2 or 3 degress will make a difference. Over a long distance, I suppose it could, but I really don't have enough experience to know. I'm just trying to learn something here. That's why I asked the question. Little did I suspect that I would get jumped on for doing so. Just how on earth is anyone supposed to learn if they get told off and insulted just for asking a question? Jeez! The strange thing is that I always have enjoyed reading the replies you make to other people, and I've even learned a few things from you in doing so. I really expected better from you, mate. You disappoint me. I'm guessing from your reply that it really wouldn't make that much of a difference. Surely you could have told me that without throwing in a few destructive comments on my lack of pilotage skills. For the record, my pilotage skills probably suck. I'm working on them, just like I'm working on crosswind landingings, steep turns, and everything else. But just like all my other skills, they probably suck. I already knew that, but thanks ever so much for confirming it. :: wanders off, mumbling something about the dismal future of general aviation, and the uselessness of usenet :: |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoffrey, cool it old chap...
OK, as a student lets talk about degrees... A pilotage trick is in knowing that if you change the angle by one degree, lets say to the left, you will be left of your desired track by 1 nm after you fly 60 nm.. (1 in 60 rule) If it is 2 degrees then you will be off to the left by 2 nm... And with shorter distances for a 2 degree change, you will be to the left by 1 nm in half the distance (30 miles) and left of track by a half nm in 15 miles... So if a B airspace is 30 nm across and you start out with a 2 degree error you will be off your desired track by one half mile when you reach the center... Unless the vfr tunnel is very narow, wind drift will be a bigger factor than heading error... This rule comes from hundreds of years of ship navigation... Do a google on the term "navigation 1 in 60 rule" and you should get hundreds of hits... See, not that difficult to visualize once you have some numbers to go by... denny "Geoffrey Barnes" wrote in ... sigh... I'm a student pilot, for crying out loud! I have no idea if 2 or 3 degress will make a difference. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Geoffrey Barnes wrote: I have no idea if 2 or 3 degress will make a difference. Did you manage to get out of high school? Do you remember any of the math they were supposed to teach you? You can use simple math to determine that your deviation in a 20 mile leg is about 1/4 mile for each degree of variation from the proper heading. George Patterson Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more often to the physician than to the patient. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This week's AW&ST: apparently THAAD will have some ABM (as in anti- *ICBM*) capability. | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 29 | August 31st 04 04:20 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Enroute chart question.. | chris priest | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | August 10th 04 01:05 AM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |