![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() All this discussion of alternate landing gear extension methods, and not one person mentioned Fred Flinstone's landing gear. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
You have got to expand your horizons g. In a number of the Piper singles the gear does come down if the engine takes the day off. The automatic extension system, if not disconnected or overridden, will extend the gear if the engine quits. It's why I override the system on takeoff as I have no burning desire for the gear to extend should the engine quit. It's also a fun system when you are descending at high speed through a layer of stratus clouds full of rime ice and the pitot heat decides that it doesn't want to heat the little pitot tube on the left side of the fuselage that provides the input for the automatic gear system, it freezes up and extends the gear suddenly when you are whistling along in the yellow arc. Doesn't do anything to improve your outlook on life at all. All the best, Rick "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Kyler Laird" wrote in message ... (Paul Tomblin) writes: The P32R Lance that I'm currently checking out in uses hydraulic pressure to hold the gear *up* against springs and gravity - lose the hydraulic pressure and the gear goes down. Cool! So if you lose your engine the plane helps you get back to the ground quickly by extending the air brakes? Is there an override (for those who fly over inhospitable terrain/water)? The hydraulic pressure is probably provided by an electric pump (I don't know for sure, not being familiar with that specific airplane). Furthermore, loss of pressure should only happen if there's a leak in the system somewhere; theoretically, once the system has pressurized with the gear up, the hydraulic pump wouldn't need to operate at all. Even if there was a slightly leaky o-ring or valve somewhere, requiring the occasional operation of the pump, it seems likely that the battery could handle the load for the brief period of time it would take to glide to a landing. Bottom line: there's no reason an engine failure would cause the gear to extend. Is there a placard that says "Do not lose engine power in excess of max. gear extension speed."? There would be no need for such a placard. Pete |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rick Durden" wrote in message
m... You have got to expand your horizons g. That's always been true. In a number of the Piper singles the gear does come down if the engine takes the day off. But not because of the failure of the hydraulic system. Kyler's comment clearly was based on an assumption that without engine power, there would be no hydraulic pressure, and that without pressure, the gear would drop (the first assumption being the incorrect one, but the second is incorrect in other airplanes as well). And actually, while I haven't flown the Pipers you're referring to, my understanding is that the gear extension was based on airspeed, not engine power. Your comment about the behavior of such systems in icing conditions would seem to reinforce this understanding. Perhaps you could elaborate on why it is you say that engine failure alone will result in the gear extending. Or perhaps you meant that the drop in airspeed that normally results after an engine failure (to achieve best glide) is enough to cause the gear to extend. In which case I'd argue that it wasn't the engine failure, but the airspeed change that caused the gear to extend (I'd also wonder why the system was designed such that the activation airspeed was at or above best glide...seems pretty non-optimal to me). Pete |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
Safety features sometimes spawn new hazards while eliminating old ones. The automatic gear extension system is a good example. "At high density altitudes," relates one owner, "the gear sometimes drops after it has been retracted. This, of course, nullifies any climb!" Indeed, there have been incidents in which the airplane might have been able to climb out safely had the gear not dropped at the wrong moment, causing a stall/mush into the terrain. Then there are Arrow pilots who lose their engines and decide to ditch with the gear up. Unfortunately, some forget to override the automatic extension system. The gear plops out seconds before splash down-sending the Arrow head over heels. Such mishaps are rare-we only counted a few (none fatal) in our five-year survey. But in mid-1987 Piper, then owned by Lear-Siegler, ordered the system deactivated because of concern over liability suits. It sold kits to do so, and told customers it wouldn't provide parts to repair the existing system. Piper sold 1,400 kits. One year later, Piper-then owned by M. Stuart Millar-withdrew its order to deactivate the automatic extension system, provided that pilots "take the necessary actions to assure that any pilot flying these aircraft are fully advised of the system and its proper operation." In part, Piper was responding to the complaints of irate owners who believed the system worked often enough to be desirable. snip *************************************** Throttle coming back to a certain point actuates a microswitch and/or the airspeed dropping to 95 knots drops the gear... There was an override, but you had to remember to actuate it... Every Arrow that I was involved with had the autoextension deactivated, period... Can't have the airplane killing me, I can do a fine job of that all on my own... denny |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Peter Duniho" said:
And actually, while I haven't flown the Pipers you're referring to, my understanding is that the gear extension was based on airspeed, not engine power. Your comment about the behavior of such systems in icing conditions The POH for the Lance isn't 100% clear on this, but my understanding is that with the emergency gear extension, the gear will come down if you go below a certain manifold pressure at one speed, or will come down regardless of the manifold pressure at a lower speed. The POH says "Some aircraft also incorporate a pressure sensing device in the system which lowers the gear regardless of gear selector position, depending upon airspeed and engine power (propellor slipstream). Gear extension is designed to occur, even if the selector is in the up position, at airspeeds below approximately 103 KIAS with power off. The extension speeds will vary from approximately 91 kts to approximately 103 KIAS depending on power settings and altitude." Actually, reading that again, it's possible that what is happening isn't that it comes on at a lower speed if you have power on, but that the propellor slipstream holds the gear up against the springs if you have power on. Sometimes I learn more answering other people's questions than I do getting answers to my own. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Dennis O'Connor" said:
Then there are Arrow pilots who lose their engines and decide to ditch with the gear up. Unfortunately, some forget to override the automatic extension system. The gear plops out seconds before splash down-sending the Arrow head over heels. First item in the emergency checklist is to put the gear override on. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Microsoft - Where quality is job 1.0.1 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Kyler Laird said:
Is there a placard that says "Do not lose engine power in excess of max. gear extension speed."? There would be no need for such a placard. Yeah, it looks like it would need to be "Do not leak hydraulic fluid in excess of max. gear extension speed." On the Lance (which is the only plane I have any experience with), even if you lost hydraulic fluid, air pressure would hold the gear up against the springs until you dropped down to max gear extension speed. I suspect you'd get a bit more drag from the gear drooping slightly into the airstream, though. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ You can be jailed for lying about being good in bed. -- Lionel, paraphrasing the Criminal Code of Canada, 159(3)(b)(i) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" writes:
Cool! So if you lose your engine the plane helps you get back to the ground quickly by extending the air brakes? Is there an override (for those who fly over inhospitable terrain/water)? The hydraulic pressure is probably provided by an electric pump Ah...that makes a difference. Furthermore, loss of pressure should only happen if there's a leak in the system somewhere; I can buy that (although my gear commonly "droops" after many checks) with the emphasis on "should". (On farm equipment, the typical culprit is the controlling valve.) Is there a placard that says "Do not lose engine power in excess of max. gear extension speed."? There would be no need for such a placard. Yeah, it looks like it would need to be "Do not leak hydraulic fluid in excess of max. gear extension speed." --kyler |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Tomblin wrote:
On the Lance (which is the only plane I have any experience with), even if you lost hydraulic fluid, air pressure would hold the gear up against the springs until you dropped down to max gear extension speed. I suspect you'd get a bit more drag from the gear drooping slightly into the airstream, though. Okay Paul, I have to ask you to explain those two statements. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, john smith said:
Paul Tomblin wrote: On the Lance (which is the only plane I have any experience with), even if you lost hydraulic fluid, air pressure would hold the gear up against the springs until you dropped down to max gear extension speed. I suspect you'd get a bit more drag from the gear drooping slightly into the airstream, though. Okay Paul, I have to ask you to explain those two statements. What don't you understand? In the Lance, the hydraulic system is there to raise the gear. Besides manually lowering the gear, there is an automatic gear extension system and a manual emergency gear extension system. If you activate the manual emergency gear extension system, springs and gravity bring the gear down - I'm not entirely clear if hydraulic pressure helps bring them down if you use the normal gear extension. The description of the emergency gear extension system in the POH says that the speed the gear will come down is lower if the plane is developing power because the prop slipstream holds it up. I'm told (I haven't verified it yet) that if you activate the emergency gear extension when you're above max gear speed, the gear won't come down, but will come down slightly into the airstream developing drag. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "The way I see it, unless we each conform, unless we obey orders, unless we follow our leaders blindly, there is no possible way we can remain free." - John Ashcroft^W^WFrank Burns |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance | [email protected] | Owning | 5 | July 22nd 03 12:35 AM |