![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 9:13*am, FLARM wrote:
Feature complete PowerFLARM v3.0 firmware will be released before the end of April. Thank you for the information. Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you FLARM for your response. We look forward to v3.0 and hope you will commit to show more respect to your customers through better communication.
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 9:13:10 AM UTC-4, FLARM wrote: Feature complete PowerFLARM v3.0 firmware will be released before the end of April. Documentation, webpage and communication updates are in process too, but firmware has top priority, for now. The version which was tested by IGC/GFAC for the approval did fulfill their requirements, but did not contain some of the collision avoidance and other features which will be in v3.0. Our release testing has become much lengthier and elaborate over the years; 'I think it works' is not sufficient... Sorry for not monitoring R.A.S frequently, for completeness here our previous post: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec....s/2ShK5S6nXN8J FLARM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 6:13:10 AM UTC-7, FLARM wrote:
Feature complete PowerFLARM v3.0 firmware will be released before the end of April. Documentation, webpage and communication updates are in process too, but firmware has top priority, for now. The version which was tested by IGC/GFAC for the approval did fulfill their requirements, but did not contain some of the collision avoidance and other features which will be in v3..0. Our release testing has become much lengthier and elaborate over the years; 'I think it works' is not sufficient... Sorry for not monitoring R.A.S frequently, for completeness here our previous post: https://groups.google..com/d/msg/rec...s/2ShK5S6nXN8J FLARM Will version 3.0 offer any improvement in PCAS performance? As you say "I think it works" is not sufficient. Andy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
v3.0 will include PCAS improvements.
Unfortunately PCAS is not an exact science, so don't expect miracles (yet)... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 6:08:09 PM UTC-4, FLARM wrote:
v3.0 will include PCAS improvements. Unfortunately PCAS is not an exact science, so don't expect miracles (yet)... As long as it works at least as good as a Zaon it will be sufficient. -Jim |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 6:08*pm, FLARM wrote:
v3.0 will include PCAS improvements. Unfortunately PCAS is not an exact science, so don't expect miracles (yet)... Are you saying ZAON is a miracle? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 6:13:10 AM UTC-7, FLARM wrote:
Feature complete PowerFLARM v3.0 firmware will be released before the end of April. Hi, any update on this? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2 of us flew with the 2.6 firmware yesterday, My understanding was that the 2.6 logger was supposed to work ok with OLC, but OLC is showing both flights as invalid.
Is there a trick to making it work on OLC? Brian |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One week ago I updated my core to 2.60 with a USB drive connected to the remote USB socket. At the end of the day I downloaded the flight using the same USB stick and the menu option on the 57mm butterfly display and uploaded it to the OLC on someone else's PC. Easiest upload to the OLC I have ever done.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 06:38:11 -0700 (PDT), Brian
wrote: 2 of us flew with the 2.6 firmware yesterday, My understanding was that the 2.6 logger was supposed to work ok with OLC, but OLC is showing both flights as invalid. Is there a trick to making it work on OLC? Brian We're seeing the same thing at TSA, one of our members who has been submitting v2.60 PowerFlarm logs to OLC since November 2012, and getting 'blue" OK ( position recorder) flags, got a "red" fail on today's log submitted to OLC. Just a guess on my part, but since v2.7 has now received IGC approval for secure logging, I'm guessing the OLC is flagging PowerFlarm logs not submitted with this latest release as invalid. Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PowerFLARM 2.60 beta available | [email protected] | Soaring | 7 | November 2nd 12 12:11 AM |
PowerFLARM Brick and PowerFLARM Remote Display Manuals Available | Paul Remde | Soaring | 30 | May 25th 12 11:58 PM |
Status PowerFLARM for USA | [email protected] | Soaring | 7 | July 14th 11 07:24 PM |
PowerFLARM | Paul Remde | Soaring | 9 | November 6th 10 04:30 AM |
PowerFLARM | Greg Arnold[_2_] | Soaring | 6 | November 2nd 10 09:32 AM |