A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How much lack of similarity in airliner flying?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 28th 04, 06:20 AM
Chris W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Marco Rispoli wrote:

Best case scenario: a plane with a full automated autloand system (Cat IIIb
I think it's called)


Unless things have changed in recent years, there are very few runways
that are equipped with a Cat IIIb ILS.


--
Chris W

Not getting the gifts you want? The Wish Zone can help.
http://thewishzone.com

  #2  
Old September 28th 04, 02:03 PM
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chris W wrote

Marco Rispoli wrote:
Best case scenario: a plane with a full automated autloand system
(Cat IIIb I think it's called)


Unless things have changed in recent years, there are very few runways
that are equipped with a Cat IIIb ILS.


NOT required!
At least in the Boeing jetliners that I flew at PanAm. You are
confusing "Approach Categories" with "Autoland". In the B-727,
the autoland system functioned quite well from a CAT II ILS.
Our B-727 minimums were CAT II and if we saw any of the Part 91
"things" at or above minimums, we could just leave the autoland
engaged to touchdown.
Autoland IS required for CAT IIIb approaches but in my experience,
was optional for CAT II operations.

Bob Moore
ATP B-707 B-727
PanAm (retired)
  #3  
Old September 28th 04, 03:18 PM
Marco Rispoli
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Moore" wrote in message
. 122...
Chris W wrote

Marco Rispoli wrote:
Best case scenario: a plane with a full automated autloand system
(Cat IIIb I think it's called)


Unless things have changed in recent years, there are very few runways
that are equipped with a Cat IIIb ILS.


NOT required!
At least in the Boeing jetliners that I flew at PanAm. You are
confusing "Approach Categories" with "Autoland". In the B-727,
the autoland system functioned quite well from a CAT II ILS.
Our B-727 minimums were CAT II and if we saw any of the Part 91
"things" at or above minimums, we could just leave the autoland
engaged to touchdown.
Autoland IS required for CAT IIIb approaches but in my experience,
was optional for CAT II operations.

Bob Moore
ATP B-707 B-727
PanAm (retired)


Thanks for the clarification Bob.

As I said, I am unqualified and just going by what I am learning in IFR
basics ... and MS Flight Sim.



--
Marco Rispoli - NJ, USA / PP-ASEL
My on-line aviation community - http://www.thepilotlounge.com


  #4  
Old September 30th 04, 03:43 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Moore" wrote in message In the B-727,
the autoland system functioned quite well from a CAT II ILS.


During Cat II trials, my colleagues logged a successful Cat II with autoland
at an airport without a Cat II ILS.

D.


  #5  
Old October 1st 04, 02:46 AM
Chris W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Capt.Doug wrote:
"Bob Moore" wrote in message In the B-727,
the autoland system functioned quite well from a CAT II ILS.



During Cat II trials, my colleagues logged a successful Cat II with autoland
at an airport without a Cat II ILS.


That's not too surprising. A Cat 1 ILS can be with in the limits of Cat
II, it's just not guaranteed to be that way all the time.

--
Chris W

Not getting the gifts you want? The Wish Zone can help.
http://thewishzone.com

  #6  
Old October 2nd 04, 03:20 PM
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Moore" wrote in message

NOT required!
......In the B-727,
the autoland system functioned quite well from a CAT II ILS.
Our B-727 minimums were CAT II ....


I concur.

John Gaquin
B727, B747


  #7  
Old September 28th 04, 08:36 AM
Ben Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Otis McNatt wrote:
If there happened to be an airline pilot
on board who was certified in any of the other Boeing models, from the
717 up the 747 and 777, but having no experience flying the 737, would he
have much of a problem landing the plane?


Hell, I could probably land it. But I can't tell you what systems are
powered by electrical bus B, or whether loss of hydraulic system A
renders the auto brakes inop. That's the difference between being a
pilot and having a type rating.

--
Ben Jackson

http://www.ben.com/
  #9  
Old September 30th 04, 10:19 AM
David Cartwright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Otis McNatt" wrote in message
om...
Suppose *both* pilots in, say, a B-737, were to die in flight
[snip ]
So, suppose it did happen. If there happened to be an airline pilot
on board who was certified in any of the other Boeing models, from the
717 up the 747 and 777, but having no experience flying the 737, would he
have much of a problem landing the plane?


I'm sure that anyone with an ATPL and experience of some sort of airliner
would be able to get it on the ground, assuming that the systems were
functioning normally (i.e. you only had to contend with the mechanics of
approaches and landings, not broken flaps, hydraulic failures, etc). And a
friend who's a commercial pilot reckons that even a PPL with a decent amount
of experience stands a reasonable chance of landing something like a 737 so
long as there's someone on the radio telling him what buttons to push, what
speeds to use, etc, etc - though for a PPL the problem would be navigating
to the nearest suitable airfield using tools that probably aren't familiar.

This said, a flying instructor friend of mine has a relative who
transitioned from the B757 to the B747 a while back. No real problems except
that the first time he landed this much bigger aircraft, in which the pilot
sits much higher off the ground: "the ground happened rather sooner than I
expected it to".

D.


  #10  
Old September 30th 04, 08:02 PM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , David Cartwright wrote:
approaches and landings, not broken flaps, hydraulic failures, etc). And a
friend who's a commercial pilot reckons that even a PPL with a decent amount
of experience stands a reasonable chance of landing something like a 737 so


I can say first hand that's possible. I did the ATOP course when United
were running it in Denver (12 hrs of groundschool, and 1 hr flight time
in their Level D sim). The B737 just wasn't hard to land, nor was it
difficult to hand-fly an instrument approach.

I would say I've got good confidence that most PPLs who've flown a high
performance single could pull it off given instructions on what to push
over the radio.

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members Andrew Gideon Aviation Marketplace 1 June 12th 04 03:03 AM
Flying is Life - The Rest is Just Details Michael Piloting 55 February 7th 04 03:17 PM
Announcing THE book on airshow flying Dudley Henriques Piloting 11 January 9th 04 07:33 PM
Announcing THE book on airshow flying! Dudley Henriques Military Aviation 2 January 7th 04 03:41 PM
U.S. NAVY TO TEST FLYING SAUCER Larry Dighera Piloting 0 December 22nd 03 07:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.