![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Christopher Brian Colohan wrote: I managed to pick up an outdated copy of the Jeppesen Private Pilot textbook for $5. This book would answer every one of your questions, and more, with much more detail and better pictures than you are likely to find on this newsgroup or on the web. Yep. That's really what you should do, Rama. That's an excellent book. George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Ramapriya" wrote: I wish you all a very cheery 2005. You really are a nice set of guys here (those branding me a terrorist notwithstanding), mostly patient even at clarifying elementary stuff ![]() Some more Qs, if you don't mind. Since I have nothing better to do at the moment... 1. How does a pilot get to know the distance to the airport that he has to land in, so that he plans his descent accordingly, in planes that don't have an onboard computer? Maps I know would give the distance between two fixed points, but how does he keep track of distance covered in flight and that sort of thing? It's a learned skill, a combination of keeping track of where you are relative to the ground and using charts, and learning to judge distances visually in the air. To inquire ground stations such info would be embarrassing, I guess ![]() A little perhaps, but pilots get lost regularly. It's much better to be a little embarrassed than totally lost. 2. What exactly is a VOR? Sounds like it's a constant all-direction radio transmission from a fixed point That's more or less correct. There are actually two different kinds of such ground-based transmitters: VORs and NDBs. As others have mentioned in this thread, Google is your friend. on the airport That's not correct. Some VOR transmitters are at airports. Others aren't. 3. If a pilot needs to land at an airport that doesn't have a control tower, how does he figure its elevation so that he may plan his descent? He consults a chart or an airport directory. 4. When a pilot says, "Give me a vector", what does he actually mean? He's asking air traffic control to tell him which direction to fly. (It's a less embarrassing way of saying, "I'm lost".) 5. When pilots use miles in conversations, does it mean the miles we normally use, or is it always nautical miles? It's supposed to be always nautical, but distance estimates are often wrong by more than 10%, which is the different between nautical and statute miles, so it often doesn't really matter. 6. The difference between airspeed and groundspeed is that airspeed is the net of the plane's speed and opposing windspeed, while groundspeed is just the plane's speed. Right? Not quite. There's no such thing as "just the plane's speed." There is only the plane's speed with respect to other things. Airspeed is the plane's speed with respect to the air. Ground speed is the plane's speed with respect to the ground. 7. What is "density altitude" It's a way of expressing the air's capacity for supporting the airplane's weight taking into account the effect of both altitude and temperature. When the air gets hot it expands and effectively gets "thinner". Aircraft performance figures assume a standard temperature. When the air is hotter than that temperature you take that into account by figuring out what the "effective" altitude is, that is, the altitude which, at standard temperature, has the same capacity for supporting the airplane's weight at whatever the temperature happens to actually be. , and how to compute it? It's usually done by looking it up in a table. There's a formula, but few people actually use it. If I'm not wrong, its use is to plan the length of takeoff roll and angle of climb. Yep. rg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5. When pilots use miles in conversations, does it mean the miles we
normally use, or is it always nautical miles? It's supposed to be always nautical, but distance estimates are often wrong by more than 10%, which is the different between nautical and statute miles, so it often doesn't really matter. how can that be.. a distance is a distance.. who said anything about "estimates".. If I measure 10nm then it is 10nm.. if my DME says I'm x miles from station y, then that's where I am... there is no 10% error.. BT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article SL5Bd.2351$232.844@fed1read05,
"BTIZ" wrote: 5. When pilots use miles in conversations, does it mean the miles we normally use, or is it always nautical miles? It's supposed to be always nautical, but distance estimates are often wrong by more than 10%, which is the different between nautical and statute miles, so it often doesn't really matter. how can that be.. a distance is a distance.. who said anything about "estimates".. If I measure 10nm then it is 10nm.. if my DME says I'm x miles from station y, then that's where I am... there is no 10% error.. Read the question again: "When pilots use miles in conversations..." When a pilot says, "Five miles from the field" the actual physical distance is never exactly five miles. Even when your DME says x miles from station y that is *not* where you are. At best, it is the slant-line distance, and at worst it's a completely arbitrary number because your DME could be kerfliggered. Furthermore, a VORTAC is more or less a point, but an airport isn't. A typical airport is many tenths of miles (of either flavor) long/wide. You'd have to pick an arbitrary point on the field and measure your distance to that. What do you pick? The tower? What if there is no tower? The middle of the runway? What if there's more than one runway? The end of the runway? Which end? So you see, the actual physical distance from your airplane to an airport is not even well defined. So when a pilot says "I'm five miles from the field" what he really means is "I'm somewhere in the vicinity of five miles" at which point it doesn't much matter what kind of miles are meant. rg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
in any case.... the reference is always to nautical.. in this day and age..
BT "Ron Garret" wrote in message ... In article SL5Bd.2351$232.844@fed1read05, "BTIZ" wrote: 5. When pilots use miles in conversations, does it mean the miles we normally use, or is it always nautical miles? It's supposed to be always nautical, but distance estimates are often wrong by more than 10%, which is the different between nautical and statute miles, so it often doesn't really matter. how can that be.. a distance is a distance.. who said anything about "estimates".. If I measure 10nm then it is 10nm.. if my DME says I'm x miles from station y, then that's where I am... there is no 10% error.. Read the question again: "When pilots use miles in conversations..." When a pilot says, "Five miles from the field" the actual physical distance is never exactly five miles. Even when your DME says x miles from station y that is *not* where you are. At best, it is the slant-line distance, and at worst it's a completely arbitrary number because your DME could be kerfliggered. Furthermore, a VORTAC is more or less a point, but an airport isn't. A typical airport is many tenths of miles (of either flavor) long/wide. You'd have to pick an arbitrary point on the field and measure your distance to that. What do you pick? The tower? What if there is no tower? The middle of the runway? What if there's more than one runway? The end of the runway? Which end? So you see, the actual physical distance from your airplane to an airport is not even well defined. So when a pilot says "I'm five miles from the field" what he really means is "I'm somewhere in the vicinity of five miles" at which point it doesn't much matter what kind of miles are meant. rg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article FviBd.3074$232.1342@fed1read05,
"BTIZ" wrote: in any case.... the reference is always to nautical.. in this day and age.. Not quite. The correct answer is the one I originally gave: It's supposed to be always nautical... Whether the reference actually *is* to nautical or not (and, somewhat orthogonally, whether this number actually has any relation to physical reality) depends on whether the pilot knows what they're doing. But, again, the vast majority of the time it doesn't matter. rg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Introduction to a newbie | Shane O | Aerobatics | 9 | December 31st 04 06:13 AM |
Questions from a newbie. | Andrew Tubbiolo | Home Built | 9 | September 14th 04 01:40 AM |
Newbie question on Rate of Climb | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | August 17th 04 03:48 PM |
Newbie questions Rail / Ejector launchers | AL | Military Aviation | 19 | November 14th 03 07:47 PM |
Basic Stupid Newbie Questions... | John Penta | Military Aviation | 5 | September 19th 03 05:23 PM |