![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yossarian wrote:
I was using a Frasca 141 sim today with an instructor when this question came up. Fullerton CA (KFUL) VOR-A approach. At WILMA on V64, flying the full approach. Do you need to turn outbound at the VOR for the procedure turn? Instructor says no because a Victor airway leads to the IAF. I say yes because even though that's true, "No PT" is not listed on that feeder route. If, after evaluating that the altitude/heading that your arrival ends up at the IAF/FAF will not require a procedure turn for alignment or altitude considerations, the best solution would be to advise ATC that you wish to make a straight in approach rather than fly the published procedure turn. If that is not practical you should advise ATC that you plan to make the published procedure turn. Either decision should be passed on to ATC for traffic separation and aircraft control. (it also has the benefit of helping insure ATC won't file some procedural violation against you). -- Darrell R. Schmidt B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Darrell S" wrote in message
news:ytloe.568$qr.464@fed1read06... If, after evaluating that the altitude/heading that your arrival ends up at the IAF/FAF will not require a procedure turn for alignment or altitude considerations, the best solution would be to advise ATC that you wish to make a straight in approach rather than fly the published procedure turn. If that is not practical you should advise ATC that you plan to make the published procedure turn. Either decision should be passed on to ATC for traffic separation and aircraft control. (it also has the benefit of helping insure ATC won't file some procedural violation against you). Not necessarily. According to the FARs and the AIM, the only way ATC can exempt you from an otherwise required PT is if they vector you to final. Otherwise, the regs apparently call for you to execute the PT; and (as discussed in another thread here recently) you must comply with the regs even if ATC gives you a clearance that is contrary to the regs. --Gary |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 22:06:48 -0500, Yossarian
wrote: I was using a Frasca 141 sim today with an instructor when this question came up. Fullerton CA (KFUL) VOR-A approach. At WILMA on V64, flying the full approach. Do you need to turn outbound at the VOR for the procedure turn? Instructor says no because a Victor airway leads to the IAF. I say yes because even though that's true, "No PT" is not listed on that feeder route. Well, for what it is worth. I just got back from SIMCOM where my instructor there actually lived and flew out of KFUL for over 20 years. I brought this up to him and he said that if you do use WILMA, then the procedure turn is required. He also made the comment about how busy seal beach VOR is and that it is used for a variety of other approaches for other airports. Scott D. Scott D. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sports class tasking | [email protected] | Soaring | 12 | April 25th 05 01:32 PM |
Agent86's List of Misconceptions of FAA Procedures Zero for 15 Putz!!! | copertopkiller | Military Aviation | 11 | April 20th 04 02:17 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Instrument Approaches and procedure turns.... | Cecil E. Chapman | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | September 18th 03 10:40 PM |