![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OP" wrote:
Ah, I think you may be forgetting that the insurance company has lawyers on staff or on retainer. There is no extra cost involved for them to pursue a law suit. As for "bad word of mouth" they couldn't care less... all insurance companies have the same policy, namely, recover costs and minimize losses in their quarterly report. Ron My only argument is experiernce in tax and accounting since 1960. Lawyers on staff or retainer have a real cost, according to what workoad you give them by company policy on how much potentially wasteful activities they should pursue. And to suggest to that bad public reputation has no effect on profits is really naive. If you drop and break merchandise in a store, what's the better decision in approaching that embarassed customer? That's small dollars, so that's easy. But airframe damage to aircraft are small dollars per incident too in the industry, relative to the big payouts on personal injury/death liability. The latter is so potentially deleterious to shareholder interests, the industry has to universally lay it off with like Lloyds of London, the "reinsurance" market under the concept of large pooling of risk. It's actually all explained in detail in the SEC 10-K filings of aircraft insurers, unlike the auto insurance industry where this isn't necessary. Even there, have you ever heard of an auto insurance company going after an uninsured motorist for the insured's vehicle damage with litigation? Keep it real. Fred F. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OtisWinslow wrote:
Hate to burst your bubble .. but if you bust an airplane due to negligence the insurance company will be expecting you to reimburse them for any claims they paid on it. (Subrogration) If you ball up a plane due to negligence, some companies will simply refuse to pay. There was a case in litigation about 10 years ago in this part of the country. The pilot crashed after going below minimums on an IFR approach. The owner's on the hook for the entire bill. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Patterson" wrote:
... If you ball up a plane due to negligence, some companies will simply refuse to pay. There was a case in litigation about 10 years ago in this part of the country. The pilot crashed after going below minimums on an IFR approach. The owner's on the hook for the entire bill. Maybe that's why price-shopping can be bad. My policy is a plain-language policy, "no fault" in bold print. Paraphrased, "We will [in bold] pay you for loss, except under the following circumstances: A)....B)..." Pilot error is not listed, but rather gov't seizure, breakdown, theft by your trusted A&P, nuclear holocaust, .... Fred F. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:08:16 GMT, George Patterson
wrote: OtisWinslow wrote: Hate to burst your bubble .. but if you bust an airplane due to negligence the insurance company will be expecting you to reimburse them for any claims they paid on it. (Subrogration) If you ball up a plane due to negligence, some companies will simply refuse to pay. There was a case in litigation about 10 years ago in this part of the country. The pilot crashed after going below minimums on an IFR approach. The owner's on the hook for the entire bill. Do you have a link or additional details? Sounds like an interesting case? I would expect insurance to pay in this type of accident, unless it could be proven that the pilot knowingly and intentionally went below minimums. -Nathan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nathan Young wrote:
Do you have a link or additional details? Sounds like an interesting case? No. The case was mentioned in a safety meeting about ten years ago. The speaker was Inspector Ryan of the Allentown, Pennsylvania FSDO. I would expect insurance to pay in this type of accident, unless it could be proven that the pilot knowingly and intentionally went below minimums. Don't know about "proven", but the insurance company claimed the pilot did exactly that. Sorta hard for a pilot to claim otherwise when a radar track and ATC tape is available. The aircraft was worth something like 1.5 million, and I'm sure that's a factor in the situation. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() They're about the same, for the same coverage, so I stick with my current insurer since I get a 10 percent discount if I pay when invoiced instead of waiting till the effective date. I pay about $600 for $40K hull insurance and $1 million liability, the most I can get. On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:02:00 -0400, "W P Dixon" wrote: Ok Gang! Who has the best rates for renter's insurance? I need 25,000 hull liability, and pretty much basic injury and such. And a second question, do any aircraft insurance companies allow payments like car insurance companies do? Avemco's rate is $390/year, which is not bad, but they want it all up front...which means I could not use the insurance because I couldn't afford to fly for a few months! ![]() Patrick student SPL aircraft structural mech -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote:
They're about the same, for the same coverage, so I stick with my current insurer since I get a 10 percent discount if I pay when invoiced instead of waiting till the effective date. I pay about $600 for $40K hull insurance and $1 million liability, the most I can get. On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:02:00 -0400, "W P Dixon" wrote: Ok Gang! Who has the best rates for renter's insurance? I need 25,000 hull liability, and pretty much basic injury and such. And a second question, do any aircraft insurance companies allow payments like car insurance companies do? Avemco's rate is $390/year, which is not bad, but they want it all up front...which means I could not use the insurance because I couldn't afford to fly for a few months! ![]() doesn't it!!? Patrick student SPL aircraft structural mech -- all the best, Dan Ford Dan, If you don't mind my asking: Did you go with the company that the Hampton people recommended? -- Saville Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments: http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat: http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm Steambending FAQ with photos: http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:45:46 -0400, gregg wrote:
Did you go with the company that the Hampton people recommended? They didn't recommend one, that I know of. I use AIG. I checked their quote against AOPA (possibly they use AIG also?) and it was identical, except that by renewing my current policy I saved 10 percent, so I stayed with the same broker (in Maine). -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote:
They didn't recommend one, that I know of. I use AIG. I checked their quote against AOPA (possibly they use AIG also?) I believe they do not. When I had the Maule, it was insured with AIG. AOPA was higher, and they told me that they could not compete with AIG for policies on Maules. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:dYEBe.5997$Om4.4130@trndny07... Cub Driver wrote: They didn't recommend one, that I know of. I use AIG. I checked their quote against AOPA (possibly they use AIG also?) I believe they do not. When I had the Maule, it was insured with AIG. AOPA was higher, and they told me that they could not compete with AIG for policies on Maules. My current renter's policy, obtained through AOPA, is issued by AIG. (But I don't know whether AOPA uses AIG for owner's policies too.) --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Renters insurance and TRIA | Scrabo | Piloting | 1 | February 20th 05 04:44 AM |
insurance for Sport Pilots! | Cub Driver | Piloting | 4 | September 11th 04 01:14 AM |
FBO Insurance requirement for tie-downs | Chris | Owning | 25 | May 18th 04 07:24 PM |
Aviation Insurance History, data, records? | cloudclimbr | General Aviation | 0 | February 17th 04 03:36 AM |
How find out one's aviation insurance claims history? Aviation Claims Information Bureau? | cloudclimbr | Owning | 1 | February 15th 04 11:16 PM |