![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't have to play any games with "radar vectors" nor do you have to put
anything in remarks. If you want to go direct then just file direct. It doesn't matter what you're using for navigation, just be able to fly what you file. I don't bother trying to file "direct" as here in the northeast I'd never get it. Besides, I never file above 7000ft and I end up with a canned TEC routing anyway. I've been asked on several occasions by ATC if I'm able direct to (fill in the blank) and the Garmin 150XL can take me right to the intersection/fix. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... I thought that was what I was saying. I can't know your thoughts, I have to go with what you write. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... So what would be the purpose of putting "VFR GPS" in the remarks section for such flights? I usually start out filing mostly direct (other than through the passes and mountains). ATC always says no and gives a bunch of airways depending on where all the jet arrivals are. Having "VFR GPS" seems to help in that the controllers will often offer me ad-hoc "short cuts" in the airway routing when there are holes in the arrivals. Filing mostly direct (other than through the passes and mountains) should be enough to tell the controller you can navigate direct. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|