![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 11/20/2005 6:02 PM, wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: Where is this defined? It's defined by the sign and some common sense. Which common sense is that, Tim? How would a VFR departure know that there might be another airplane on a 10 mile final using the ILS system at a non-towered field? A tower won't instruct you to hold short of the ILS critical areas with an aircraft on a 10 mile final. If you can see an aircraft on approach (or hopefully are clued in by his CTAF reports) if he is close enough that you decide you need to hold short, then the common sense decision would be to hold short of the ILS critical area signs. It's the conservative and safest option. And, it's what the FAA airport folks hope you will do. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
In this month's AOPA Flight Training magazine, I read an article which implied there was still some requirement to remain clear of the ILS critical area even when the tower was closed. The reason you're supposed to keep clear of the ILS critical area is because your airplane can affect the glide slope beam. The presence or absence of somebody in the tower doesn't change the physics of how microwaves interact with metallic bodies. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/20/2005 12:55 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote: In this month's AOPA Flight Training magazine, I read an article which implied there was still some requirement to remain clear of the ILS critical area even when the tower was closed. The reason you're supposed to keep clear of the ILS critical area is because your airplane can affect the glide slope beam. The presence or absence of somebody in the tower doesn't change the physics of how microwaves interact with metallic bodies. Thanks, but that wasn't my question. In fact, you snipped my question out of the 'quote' which you included in your response. -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Sacramento, CA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Roy Smith wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: In this month's AOPA Flight Training magazine, I read an article which implied there was still some requirement to remain clear of the ILS critical area even when the tower was closed. The reason you're supposed to keep clear of the ILS critical area is because your airplane can affect the glide slope beam. The presence or absence of somebody in the tower doesn't change the physics of how microwaves interact with metallic bodies. The glideslope signal is reflected off the ground. The structure that houses the GS antenna is located far enough down the runway so that the GS signal is bounced off the ground approximately 1000 feet from the approach end of the runway. If you look, you will notice the ground is quite flat and level where the signal is reflected. An object, especially metal, which intrudes in the space between the antenna and the runway threshold at the approach end of the runway may distort the GS signal. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... In this month's AOPA Flight Training magazine, I read an article which implied there was still some requirement to remain clear of the ILS critical area even when the tower was closed. I've been looking through the AIM, and can't find anything like this. It does say that when the tower is open, it will keep the area clear when there is an aircraft past the FAF and the weather is below 800/2. Is there a rule which states that the ILS critical area must be kept clear at any time when the tower is not in operation? Can you please provide a reference? Maybe no rule but good airmanship should keep you out of the critical area if its required. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/20/2005 3:56 PM, Chris wrote:
"Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... In this month's AOPA Flight Training magazine, I read an article which implied there was still some requirement to remain clear of the ILS critical area even when the tower was closed. I've been looking through the AIM, and can't find anything like this. It does say that when the tower is open, it will keep the area clear when there is an aircraft past the FAF and the weather is below 800/2. Is there a rule which states that the ILS critical area must be kept clear at any time when the tower is not in operation? Can you please provide a reference? Maybe no rule but good airmanship should keep you out of the critical area if its required. How does the pilot know it is required if not told to keep clear of the area by the control tower? -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Sacramento, CA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... How does the pilot know it is required if not told to keep clear of the area by the control tower? He can't know for sure when it is required. But if he's issued an IFR departure clearance and not told to hold for release he knows it's not required and without an IFR departure clearance there's little reason to enter the critical area. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
How does the pilot know it is required if not told to keep clear of the area by the control tower? By knowing the weather, knowing that someone is on the approach, and knowing where the ILS critical area is. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:28:09 -0800, Mark Hansen
wrote: In this month's AOPA Flight Training magazine, I read an article which implied there was still some requirement to remain clear of the ILS critical area even when the tower was closed. I've been looking through the AIM, and can't find anything like this. It does say that when the tower is open, it will keep the area clear when there is an aircraft past the FAF and the weather is below 800/2. Is there a rule which states that the ILS critical area must be kept clear at any time when the tower is not in operation? Can you please provide a reference? Thanks, All I can find is a statement in the AIM that the ILS critical area is NOT protected at uncontrolled fields; so y'all be careful out there! Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:28:09 -0800, Mark Hansen wrote: In this month's AOPA Flight Training magazine, I read an article which implied there was still some requirement to remain clear of the ILS critical area even when the tower was closed. I've been looking through the AIM, and can't find anything like this. It does say that when the tower is open, it will keep the area clear when there is an aircraft past the FAF and the weather is below 800/2. Is there a rule which states that the ILS critical area must be kept clear at any time when the tower is not in operation? Can you please provide a reference? Thanks, All I can find is a statement in the AIM that the ILS critical area is NOT protected at uncontrolled fields; so y'all be careful out there! Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) At many airports, such as my home field, KRYY, the glideslope is "unusable" when the tower is closed... Perhaps that is some additional 'protection'.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
comment period reopened on DC area "ADIZ" | Bob Noel | Piloting | 3 | November 15th 05 04:39 PM |
Los Angeles radio tower crash kills 2 | Paul Hirose | Piloting | 178 | August 6th 05 03:46 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
ILS Critical Area signage: Localizer or Glideslope? | Adam K. | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 30th 03 10:09 PM |
Patrick AFB Area Log, Monday 30 June 2003 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | July 1st 03 06:37 AM |