A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

An interesting trial flight attempt...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 8th 06, 12:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An interesting trial flight attempt...

How many charge/discharge cycles do they figure?

More than your PDA ;-)
There's more detail on the Lange web site under FAQs
http://www.lange-flugzeugbau.de/bild...terie-engl.pdf
Hope that helps !
Best Regards, Dave

  #22  
Old February 8th 06, 03:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An interesting trial flight attempt...

Did anyone figured out the cost per, say, 1000ft of altitude, giving
the battery replacement cost, charging cost, engine maintainance etc?
It would be interesting to see a comparisom between electric glider,
motorgliders, aerotows and winch tows as for the overall cost per
1000ft of altitude.

Ramy

  #23  
Old February 8th 06, 03:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An interesting trial flight attempt...

You could get 200 US glider pilots to chip in $500 on something that
won't increase their L/D? You must be quite a salesman 8^)


I for one, will be more than happy to chip in $500 for something that
will significantly increase safety. Most of us spend up to about $1000
on parachutes which we probably never use, so why not a Flarm like
device? I hope someone will either license the Flarm or produce
something similar, and then make it mandatory... Till then we will
continue average at least one mid air per year in the US...

Ramy

  #24  
Old February 8th 06, 04:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An interesting trial flight attempt...

Ramy wrote:
You could get 200 US glider pilots to chip in $500 on something that
won't increase their L/D? You must be quite a salesman 8^)



I for one, will be more than happy to chip in $500 for something that
will significantly increase safety. Most of us spend up to about $1000
on parachutes which we probably never use, so why not a Flarm like
device? I hope someone will either license the Flarm or produce
something similar, and then make it mandatory... Till then we will
continue average at least one mid air per year in the US...


I gave a short presentation on FLARM at the 2005 SSA convention, and
have tried to generate some interest in it. Very few people have had any
interest in it, unlike the huge response in Europe. I think the
difference is we don't have nearly the mid-air collision problem that
they do in the Alps, Pyrenees, and other places. Their airspace can be
far denser with gliders than ours, even including the White mountains
and the ridge-runners along the Alleghenies, and as a result, they run
into each other more frequently.

The poor response I get may be reasonable: personally, I think a
transponder is a better value at, say, $2000, than FLARM at $620Euro
(US$745). My experience is the glider that is likely to run into me is
the one I'm thermalling with and already know about. Except for
contests, I see more airplanes en route than gliders.

Even so, I hope people will pursue it. There are mitigating features;
for example, the FLARM will log a flight in IGC format, though it's not
secure at this point. If that happened, it wouldn't cost much more than
just an IGC logger. Busy clubs could benefit from it's use with a ground
station and automatic logging of tows and club glider use by it's
members, and there are other applications under way.

Besides technical people, I think we need some good lawyers that can
analyze the liability situation, then create a means to license or
otherwise acquire the technology from FLARM that would ease the concerns
of the FLARM developers.

I'd be willing to chip in at least $200 for starters.

--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

www.motorglider.org
  #25  
Old February 8th 06, 05:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An interesting trial flight attempt...

Marc Ramsey wrote:

I also suspect that FLARM won't do much to help where I'm most concerned
about a collision with another glider, the ridge running down the White
and Inyo mountains near the CA/NV border. FLARM advertises an effective
range of 2-3 km, or 1 to 1.5 nm. Given a head-on approach between two
gliders, each running at a TAS of 150 knots, you'll be lucky to get 10
seconds of warning. Might work for an ex-fighter pilot, but that's not
much time for someone like me...


But in the case of running the Whites, there's a radio procedure in place.

http://www.soaringsafety.org/present...2Nose_2002.ppt

Any idea how universally adopted (or not) it is?

Jeremy
  #26  
Old February 8th 06, 07:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An interesting trial flight attempt...

At the risk of further hijacking the thread , may I suggest pilots not to
turn off their transponders when flying over the white mountains? Some of us
nowadays are equipped with low cost TPAS and would like to receive your
transponder signal...

Ramy

"Jeremy Zawodny" wrote in message
...

But in the case of running the Whites, there's a radio procedure in place.

http://www.soaringsafety.org/present...2Nose_2002.ppt

Any idea how universally adopted (or not) it is?

Jeremy



  #27  
Old February 11th 06, 12:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An interesting trial flight attempt...

Did anyone figured out the cost....

Are you mad ? If we knew the real cost we'd never fly !
Especially if our spouses knew the real cost !
See ya, Dave

  #28  
Old February 11th 06, 12:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An interesting trial flight attempt...

Actually, I may try to convince wife it may be cheaper on the long run
to buy a motorglider (or electric glider) then pay for aerotows, but I
need numbers...

Ramy

  #29  
Old February 11th 06, 04:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default An interesting trial flight attempt...


"Ramy" wrote in message
ups.com...
Actually, I may try to convince wife it may be cheaper on the long run
to buy a motorglider (or electric glider) then pay for aerotows, but I
need numbers...

Ramy


Actually, it's probably best to forget about using numbers, as that implies
that you will try to use logic and fact . . . and we all know *that* won't
work.

Naw, overall it's probably more expensive to operate a self-launch. But that
extra money buys amazing versatility, the ability to go where pure gliders
can't (or at least not without a retrieve), And the convenience of always
having your "tow plane" tucked away conveniently along for the ride.

Purist?? Hawks and eagles self-launch!

bumper
ASH26E
Minden, NV


  #30  
Old February 11th 06, 04:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Glider instrument pricing (was An interesting trial flight attempt...)

I did a very rough analysis of another glider instrument, probable
market size, and necessary pricing he
https://www.freytag.us/twiki/bin/vie...rLiftDetectors

The good thing about the FLARM is that the design/function is resolved
so your costs are reduced there. But then you still have the risks of
distribution and, implicit, support.

Cheers,
Richard "H3"

Ramy wrote:
You could get 200 US glider pilots to chip in $500 on something that
won't increase their L/D? You must be quite a salesman 8^)


I for one, will be more than happy to chip in $500 for something that
will significantly increase safety. Most of us spend up to about $1000
on parachutes which we probably never use, so why not a Flarm like
device? I hope someone will either license the Flarm or produce
something similar, and then make it mandatory... Till then we will
continue average at least one mid air per year in the US...

Ramy


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFI without commercial? Jay Honeck Piloting 75 December 8th 10 04:17 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Dumb Reg question John Gaquin Piloting 67 May 4th 05 04:54 AM
NAS and associated computer system Newps Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 12th 04 05:12 AM
Real World Specs for FS 2004 Paul H. Simulators 16 August 18th 03 09:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.