![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:kzg2g.8412$Qz.914@fed1read11... I do not think that is correct.. a "student" pilot does not need all the funny endorsements while a student.. but once graduated.. he does.. The endorsement is required when acting as PIC. A student pilot flying solo is acting as PIC. Ergo, the endorsement is required by a student pilot flying solo. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com... Student pilots are exempt from the endorsement requirement since they are "type rated" to that aircraft. What FAR grants that exemption? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
If a student pilot takes all his training in a tailwheel aircraft (including solo), but takes his flight test in a nosedragger, does the newly minted private pilot need a separate tailwheel endorsement? Yes, he will still require a tailwheel endorsement somewhere in his logbook as required by FARs. The CFI who gave his training would simply make the endorsement. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't have to surrender your Student certificate since
it is also likely to be your medical. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... | my impression at the time was that without these endorsements, | regardless of my "tailwheel" training and complex/high performance | checkride, i couldn't act as PIC of either. | | That's true today too. Once you surrender your student ticket for your | private you must have the endorsements. | | -Robert | |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Still the student pilot must have a solo endorsement for
each make and model on the student pilot certificate and a 90 day solo endorsement in the logbook to be qualified to take the practical test. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Jose" wrote in message . com... | How would the student fly a nose dragger, that he had never been signed off in? It is my understanding that a student must be signed off in every different model of plane. | | One scenario - the student is the daugher of a CFI who owns a 152 and | she has flown it right seat since she was twelve (with the father in the | plane of course!) None of this time was logged but the student is | competent. The daughter wants to learn to fly, but "not from daddy" and | falls in love with a blue cub on the field. The instructor's cute too. | | She takes lessons, gets all the way to the checkout, and the cub moves | on. The cub owner is a friend of dad and knows how the daughter flies | the 152 (in fact, she has flown them both in a 172) quite competently. | | So, the instructor signs her off for the test and the FAA examiner takes | her for the checkride, which she passes. | | Jose | -- | The price of freedom is... well... freedom. | for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correct, all endorsements are required as part of the
practical test requirements. Make/model and 90 day. If the student has to fly to a different airport for the test, a round-trip solo endorsement is required [make it round trip so the examiner doesn't have to sign them off for a return flight in case the student fails the test]. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. wrote in message ps.com... | Jose | I think the examiner couldn't do it without the proper endorsements on | the license for the aricraft being used for the flight check. | |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
If a student pilot takes all his training in a tailwheel aircraft (including solo), but takes his flight test in a nosedragger, does the newly minted private pilot need a separate tailwheel endorsement? Jose He needs an endorsement before he can solo the tailwheel... he cannot be PIC until he has the endorsement, and as sole occupant he IS the PIC. Dave |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What FAR grants that exemption?
61.31(k)(2)(ii) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Still the student pilot must have a solo endorsement for
each make and model on the student pilot certificate and a 90 day solo endorsement in the logbook to be qualified to take the practical test. Ok, would this suffice as a (permanent) tailwheel endorsement? Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com... What FAR grants that exemption? 61.31(k)(2)(ii) Thanks. I did see that (later). I also saw someone else state that the tailwheel restriction isn't a rating limitation. I personally don't see why it's not a rating limitation, but do you have an official definition of "rating limitation" to use to properly understand 61.31(k)(2)(ii)? Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tailwheel units on ebay | Victor Bravo | Home Built | 1 | July 24th 05 09:47 AM |
Tailwheel Crosswind Landing | Piloting | 32 | December 6th 04 02:42 AM | |
Advice on flying Pitts with Haigh Locking Tailwheel | Ditch | Home Built | 19 | January 4th 04 10:18 PM |
Tailwheel endorsement | John Harper | Piloting | 58 | December 12th 03 01:48 PM |