![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does the Avmap have a USB input?
No. (The new EKP-IV might, though?) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: Does the Avmap have a USB input? No. (The new EKP-IV might, though?) The LS800 (VistaNav) does. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Garmin's screen size is adequate for the job. You can get all the info
you need off of that screen. Sure a larger screen would be better, but what other product has the real time nexrad radar? Answer, NONE. And TONS of pilots use these small screens to navigate all over the world with very few problems. If anyone comes out with a larger screen GPS at Oshkosh, I would think it would be Garmin. Of course you CAN get larger screen, get a 530!! Jay Honeck wrote: Go see one at the nearest dealer. Take your 2000 with you. You may be surprised at what is accomplished on the smaller screen. I was lucky enough to borrow a friend's 396 for four hours. Although I didn't get to fly with it, I *did* get to play extensively, and was able to watch the weather (VERY cool) develop "live". I was also able to compare the screen to my current GPSs. (As you may recall, we've got the awesome AvMap EKP-III on the pilot's yoke, and the very nice Airmap 2000c on the co-pilot's yoke. This set-up gives us unparallelled situational awareness -- but no weather.) The 396 falls between these two units in readability and resolution. The AvMap simply can't be beat, with its 7-inch screen and extremely sharp resolution. The Lowrance product is very good, but is not nearly as sharp as the Garmin or the AvMap. However, size really DOES matter in GPS. The ability to view your entire route, clearly, without losing too much detail, only comes with screen size -- and both the AvMap and the Airmap beat the Garmin hand's down in this department. We would have a VERY hard time going back to a screen the size of the 396 (even with my new progressive-lens glasses), but it might be worth a step backwards in that department to achieve the undeniable safety of having on-board weather "radar". AvMap remains a "fringe" player in the market, despite having a fantastic product -- so I understand their inability to spend the $$$ on acquiring weather capability. However, I am completely puzzled by Lowrance's inaction with regards to weather depiction. With their commanding hold on the boating market, you would *think* that they would have a HUGE potential market for weather depiction? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Intersting several threads. I'm suprised no one has mentioned VistaNav.
Don't have it I use Pocket FMS on an iPAQ, but vistnav seems the way of the future. Sure it is a little expensive, but you get generational improvements - Wx, Approach plates, synthetic vision, runway diags etc etc. And on a Motion LS800 (or any other tablet PC - screensize - if you want 15" you got 15" - the motion is 8" IIRC). Plus extensible and (somewhat) expandable. A Garmin 396 to my mind is essentially old technology with a few improvements as add ons - better screen resolution, Wx and so on. It is a GPS, and probably a good one, but 2D just another mousetrap. The vistanav system, IMHO, really differentiates from the crowd.... If I were looking to expend some reasonably serious bucks, this would be my first port of call. New system - no problem, just upgrade the software AND you don't have to upload anything from your PC - it IS your PC (LS 800 with bluetooth keyboard other tablets with builtin keyboards etc etc). Jusrt a thought and, as always, YMMV. Cheers, Kevin "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... Does the Avmap have a USB input? No. (The new EKP-IV might, though?) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have had my 396 since last September. I have used it to make far
more informed decisions in the cockpit than I could have made otherwise. What you see on the screen is what you'll see outside regarding buildups and precip. Armed with this I have been able to navigate around buildups and pick my way through weather that I would not have done otherwise. That alone has saved me flight time that would have been spent performing lengthy diversions. Informing FSS on accurate info is helpful when giving a pilot report. The combination of the 396 with XM, and a stormscope provides me with a lot of information. Last month I arrived at an airport in stormy weather. I had been watching it for the duration of the flight and was planning to use an alternate but the weather appeared to be breaking up. There was a narow but clear corridor along one of the VOR approaches to the field. I shot the approach and landed in light precip and good visibility. Bob |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Goodish" wrote in message ... In article . net, Mike Spera wrote: You can add XM Radio for $6.99/mo. + a one time $14.99 activation fee. I already hook in my iPod to my intercom so I am not interested in the radio portion. BTW, when I called XM to activate the audio content, I was told that there was no activation fee because the 396 uses the same radio ID for both datalink and audio--in other words, you aren't activating another radio, you're simply starting the audio subscription to a radio that's already activated. JKG FWIW, I have to different XM radios in cars and it has been trivial to get them to waive activation fees. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
"Mike Spera" wrote: I am definitely keeping this thing! By now, you have probably reached the "How did I ever live without this thing?" stage. I can't imagine that I ever thought it was reasonable to do a blind, airport to airport hop-skotch from Mobile to Houston in a state of high anxiety over thunderstorms the whole way. Talk about the bad old days! You said it right there. I can't imagine making the mid-day journey from South FL to NC without it. Or flying along the gulf coast near NO. High anxiety indeed. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 9-Jul-2006, Mike Spera wrote: In IMC, there is no way I can even see the red blob in my path to even ask for a heading change. If ATC is not busy, they may tell me, maybe not. Most of my flying is in the Pacific Northwest where thunderstorms are rare. (Icing is far and away the biggest weather limitation to IFR flight.) But on a flight over the Continental Divide in Montana last summer, while in IMC, the controller advised me of a new and urgent SIGMET for an area of scattered, embedded thunderstorms that had popped up, unforcasted, right along my flight path. He then did a masterful job of vectoring me through them. I hit some rain, but no real turbulence. Still, it would have been a lot less nerve wracking if I had been able to see where I was going in relation to the storms. Also, if this had been in busy airspace I doubt that the controller would have had time to do this vectoring for more than a couple of planes at most. Whether by vectors or in-cockpit display, Nexrad can't be used for picking your way though a line of weather, but it will work for steering safely between and around scattered storms. If I flew frequently in thunderstorm country I would have already bought a 396 (or some other Nexrad display system). As it is, it's high on my wish list. -Elliott Drucker |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FPS396 Precip Colors
Do the precip colors displayed on the GPS396 correspond to FSS Level 1-6? How do you know how heavy the precip within a given color band is? What decision making criteria do you use to determine if you will fly within a given color band? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ps.com... Go see one at the nearest dealer. Take your 2000 with you. You may be surprised at what is accomplished on the smaller screen. I was lucky enough to borrow a friend's 396 for four hours. Although I didn't get to fly with it, I *did* get to play extensively, and was able to watch the weather (VERY cool) develop "live". I was also able to compare the screen to my current GPSs. snip a step backwards in that department to achieve the undeniable safety of having on-board weather "radar". Jay, after the tornado, you should have one of these in your convertable. Al G |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |