Post-accident photos of RV/TBM Avenger Oshkosh taxi collision

In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:
Morgans wrote:
They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.
Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.

The news servers I run don't carry alt.binaries at all, because the
terabytes of data involved are too expensive for the non-profits I do it
for.

--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
It might not be practical, it might not be a good idea, but it could work.
Sort of like Windows.
-- berry

Morgans wrote:
"Jerry Springer" wrote in


Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.


Just to be sure I didn't miss them, what are they named in the subject box?

I'm pretty sure that my server removed them.

The easiest wasy to find them is to look for the sender "skywise"
and then "OSH TBM Accident" they are up this morning. I say these are
very educational photos.

try this link to see them, not sure how long it well be avialable.


http://flickr.com/photos/bowen/tags/...h2006accident/

Could be that some servers don't have the room to keep them up for long.

Jerry

Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Morgans wrote:

They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.


There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.

The news servers I run don't carry alt.binaries at all, because the
terabytes of data involved are too expensive for the non-profits I do it
for.

No kidding, I do believe that everyone understands that and knows what
we were talking about.

("Morgans" wrote)
I'm pretty sure that my server removed them.


I'm sending you the pics.


Montblack

In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:
Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:
Morgans wrote:
They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.

No kidding, I do believe that everyone understands that and knows what
we were talking about.

If "everyone" understands that, what possible reason could you have for
telling Morgans that they're still on your server when you don't even tell
him which server you're talking about? How does that help him? And why
would you refer to your server as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
site"?


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Ok I'll "just hit delete". You can be "Delete".
- Ron Ritzman, talking to a spammer

Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Paul Tomblin wrote:

In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Morgans wrote:

They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.


No kidding, I do believe that everyone understands that and knows what
we were talking about.


If "everyone" understands that, what possible reason could you have for
telling Morgans that they're still on your server when you don't even tell
him which server you're talking about? How does that help him? And why
would you refer to your server as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
site"?


Just to make you feel like a big shot and come on here and tell us
something that everyone that has been on the internet for over a day and
uses usenet already understands, Morgan had already mentioned that
they were not on his server or he might have missed the title to them.

On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:03:45 GMT, Jerry Springer
wrote:

Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Morgans wrote:

They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.


There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.

The news servers I run don't carry alt.binaries at all, because the
terabytes of data involved are too expensive for the non-profits I do it
for.

No kidding, I do believe that everyone understands that and knows what
we were talking about.


Actually what you stated is a common misconception. I honestly
thought you didn't understand how usenet worked. This is not a dig,
rather an observation due to the terminology used. I thought Paul did
a good job of explaining the architecture of NNTP.

z

On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 21:29:33 GMT, Jerry springer
wrote:

Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Paul Tomblin wrote:

In a previous article, Jerry Springer said:

Morgans wrote:

They have been removed from my server, or from the binaries site, now.

Just checked and they are still there on the
alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site.

There is no such thing as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation site". Each
individual news server carries or doesn't carry usenet newsgroups for as
long as they want, so while they may still be on the server you're looking
at, they may have already expired from the server "Morgans" is looking at.


No kidding, I do believe that everyone understands that and knows what
we were talking about.


If "everyone" understands that, what possible reason could you have for
telling Morgans that they're still on your server when you don't even tell
him which server you're talking about? How does that help him? And why
would you refer to your server as "the alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
site"?


Just to make you feel like a big shot and come on here and tell us
something that everyone that has been on the internet for over a day and
uses usenet already understands, Morgan had already mentioned that
they were not on his server or he might have missed the title to them.

The internet has nothing to do with usenet. The internet uses the
HTTP protocol. Usenet uses the NNTP protocol. Both exist without the
need for the other. NNTP is actually older than "the internet."

HTH.
z

"zatatime" wrote

The internet has nothing to do with usenet. The internet uses the
HTTP protocol. Usenet uses the NNTP protocol. Both exist without the
need for the other. NNTP is actually older than "the internet."
******************************************

You'all have gotten on my last nerve, now.

You all have to remember that most people do not give a rat's A** how or why
it all works. Stop trying to show each other how big your d**ks are, and
get that through your thick heads.

And if usenet has nothing to do with Internet, why do you read it through
services provided by your ISP's?

Really, get a life! Don't try to impress everyone with a bunch of technical
names. General names are plenty for most people to try to comprehend.
--
Jim in NC

zatatime writes:
The internet has nothing to do with usenet. The internet uses the
HTTP protocol. Usenet uses the NNTP protocol. Both exist without the
need for the other. NNTP is actually older than "the internet."

May I suggest that you go read a bit about the history of the arpanet,
internet, usenet, and the world wide web?

This should be a good starting point:

http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/

Chris