Garmin 596 Ideas

In article ,
(Paul Tomblin) wrote:

- geo-referenced approach plates

I don't understand this one.
Paul, please explain.

It means that with GPS input, the little airplane flys over the approach
plate that is displayed on the unit and it's actually in the correct
location. My FlightPrep/ChartCase program will do it on a notebook/laptop,
but it's windoze/hard drive based instead of solid state. Pretty cool and
dead on accurate when it works.
Jim

"john smith" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Paul Tomblin) wrote:

- geo-referenced approach plates

I don't understand this one.
Paul, please explain.

In article ,
"Jim Burns" wrote:

It means that with GPS input, the little airplane flys over the approach
plate that is displayed on the unit and it's actually in the correct
location. My FlightPrep/ChartCase program will do it on a notebook/laptop,
but it's windoze/hard drive based instead of solid state. Pretty cool and
dead on accurate when it works.

Now I understand. I have flown approaches with an MX-20, but having the
approach plate overlayed would be a definite advantage.

"john smith" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Jim Burns" wrote:

It means that with GPS input, the little airplane flys over the approach
plate that is displayed on the unit and it's actually in the correct
location. My FlightPrep/ChartCase program will do it on a
notebook/laptop,
but it's windoze/hard drive based instead of solid state. Pretty cool
and
dead on accurate when it works.

Now I understand. I have flown approaches with an MX-20, but having the
approach plate overlayed would be a definite advantage.

It would be nice to have the vertical portion as well. Step down
altitudes and vertical Nav. Not available in the panel mount Garmins.

Al G

Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, john smith said:
Here are a few suggestions for the future Garmin GPS-596...
- flat panel package, one-inch thick (max, including battery)
- replaceable Li-ion battery pack; optional AA battery pack
- a five-inch diagonal screen (as on the 530)
- landscape or portrait viewing select
- XM weather and radio
- higher resolution
- faster processor
- ability to download text (NOTAM's, weather)

- geo-referenced approach plates

--

The Garmin 430/530 already displays your position with respect to the
approach course, so I am not sure if georeferencing an actual approach
chart would be worth the extra trouble. What would be useful is to show
the stepdown altitude for each segment. Obviously this information is
available in the database, but I don't know why they chose not to
display it.

I can't believe no one has mentioned airways -- or did I just miss it.

And I can't believe Jay hasn't complained about the lack of airways on his
496.

The last time I used an airway was when there was a radar outage... guess
where? Just north east of Jay's!
Jim

"Jon Woellhaf" wrote in message
...
I can't believe no one has mentioned airways -- or did I just miss it.

And I can't believe Jay hasn't complained about the lack of airways on his
496.

In article ,
"Jon Woellhaf" wrote:

I can't believe no one has mentioned airways -- or did I just miss it.
And I can't believe Jay hasn't complained about the lack of airways on his
496.

Jay doesn't fly instruments, so he has no use for airways.

"john smith" wrote in message
...
Jay doesn't fly instruments, so he has no use for airways.

Ah, yes. That explains it.

"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
oups.com...
Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, john smith said:
Here are a few suggestions for the future Garmin GPS-596...
- flat panel package, one-inch thick (max, including battery)
- replaceable Li-ion battery pack; optional AA battery pack
- a five-inch diagonal screen (as on the 530)
- landscape or portrait viewing select
- XM weather and radio
- higher resolution
- faster processor
- ability to download text (NOTAM's, weather)

- geo-referenced approach plates

--

The Garmin 430/530 already displays your position with respect to the
approach course, so I am not sure if georeferencing an actual approach
chart would be worth the extra trouble. What would be useful is to show
the stepdown altitude for each segment. Obviously this information is
available in the database, but I don't know why they chose not to
display it.

This had something to do with lack of WAAS approval.

Al G