![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Chambers writes:
The discussion of trim in a flight sim on a PC is academic. Hardly. Trim does the same thing on a simulator that it does in real life. In an aircraft, trim is not so much a "convenience" as you seem to think. A lot of aircraft and pilots seem to do without it, so obviously it is not necessary. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-10-09, Mxsmanic wrote:
Robert Chambers writes: The discussion of trim in a flight sim on a PC is academic. Hardly. Trim does the same thing on a simulator that it does in real life. Not really. In a real aircraft, you trim out the forces you're feeling without actually moving the control itself. However, controls for a PC don't work like this - so you have to feed in trim to the simulator, while gradually moving the joystick to the centre position - because all that's providing resistance is a set of static springs. It would be possible to design flight controls for a PC simulator (which are inadequate on so many levels - even the expensive ones) which work just like trim works on a real aircraft, but it would be extremely expensive. The other problem with PC controls is that they don't move nearly far enough. The CH yoke for example, goes in and out (for pitch) about 3 or 4 inches, and turns about 45 degrees in each diretion. The yoke on a Cessna 172 has probably 18 inches of fore/aft travel and turns through about 120 degrees in each direction. CH rudder pedals maybe displace an inch or so, but the rudder pedals on a C172 probably displace a good 5 or 6 inches. This means that the controls on a simulator are _insanely_ sensitive if you want them to be able to make full control deflections. In an aircraft, trim is not so much a "convenience" as you seem to think. A lot of aircraft and pilots seem to do without it, so obviously it is not necessary. Name ten! If you're doing without trim in a real aircraft, you _are_ doing it wrong, at least for any conventional light plane right up to airliners. Trim is absolutely essential in pitch. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith writes:
This means that the controls on a simulator are _insanely_ sensitive if you want them to be able to make full control deflections. And the cheaper the controls, the worse they are. I tried a cheapo joystick today and almost dived into the ground. I don't think it moves more than a quarter of an inch from stop to stop for control surfaces. Name ten! Anyone who flies an aircraft that doesn't provide trim. Trim is absolutely essential in pitch. I just worry about not knowing how far away I am from neutral. I could be applying enormous control surface deflection with trim without necessarily being aware of it. So I might try to move a bit further with the yoke and find that I'm already against the stop. The other thing that worries me is distraction. Takeoffs, landings, climbs, and approaches seem like bad times to be fiddling with trim, although I suppose that depends on where the trim controls are (I get the impression that they are often in odd places). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message news ![]() Robert Chambers writes: The discussion of trim in a flight sim on a PC is academic. Hardly. Trim does the same thing on a simulator that it does in real life. In an aircraft, trim is not so much a "convenience" as you seem to think. A lot of aircraft and pilots seem to do without it, so obviously it is not necessary. -- No really they don't. Elevator trim is taught during your first lesson for your Private certificate. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
news ![]() Robert Chambers writes: The discussion of trim in a flight sim on a PC is academic. Hardly. Trim does the same thing on a simulator that it does in real life. In an aircraft, trim is not so much a "convenience" as you seem to think. A lot of aircraft and pilots seem to do without it, so obviously it is not necessary. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. They must be some really strong pilots... as not trimming a C-172 will give your arms quite a workout and results in a lot of unnecessary work on behalf of the pilot, and makes it harder to fly "smoothly and precisely" as you are constantly "fighting" the force on the elevator control. I can tell which the difference between approaches where I have the plane nicely trimmed on on final and the ones where the plane is slightly out of trim, as on the out of trim approaches I am having to "work more" than I need to and it takes away from other things I need to be concentrating on to ensure a nice smooth landing. Wade Hasbrouck PP-ASEL http://spaces.live.com/wadehas |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It totally depends on the plane. I used to fly a Globe Swift and I
never found any reason to need to touch the trim. The plane flew hands off at whatever you pointed it to. I currently own a Mooney and I spend more time in the pattern moving the trim than holding the throttle. The entire downwind of a Mooney is rolling the trim back, slowing the plane down. Bottom line is that it depends on the design of the plane how sensitive it is to trim and how much trim change it requires for any displacement. -Robert, CFII |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
It totally depends on the plane. Second that. The C150 I fly requires a lot less trim than the C172, to the point that I forget to use it sometimes. The 172 really doesn't let me forget. Tom Young |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Young wrote:
Second that. The C150 I fly requires a lot less trim than the C172, to the point that I forget to use it sometimes. The 172 really doesn't let me forget. I ferried a C-172 with a coworker up to an engine shop a few years ago as one of a flight of two. When we got there, I got into the back of the other C-172. After we took off, I carefully noted when the pilot trimmed the aircraft, then leaned forward to engage the guys in the front in conversation. The pilot would fly along for a minute or two, then retrim. I'd lean back and wait a few minutes until he retrimmed yet again. Then I leaned forward to talk to the guys up front again.... making cracks about his apparent inability to hold altitude. Heh heh... I must have done it four or five times before the pilot caught on. G Lucky for me, there was no ejection seat in the C-172. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
Tom Young wrote: Second that. The C150 I fly requires a lot less trim than the C172, to the point that I forget to use it sometimes. The 172 really doesn't let me forget. I ferried a C-172 with a coworker up to an engine shop a few years ago as one of a flight of two. When we got there, I got into the back of the other C-172. After we took off, I carefully noted when the pilot trimmed the aircraft, then leaned forward to engage the guys in the front in conversation. The pilot would fly along for a minute or two, then retrim. I'd lean back and wait a few minutes until he retrimmed yet again. Then I leaned forward to talk to the guys up front again.... making cracks about his apparent inability to hold altitude. Heh heh... I must have done it four or five times before the pilot caught on. G Lucky for me, there was no ejection seat in the C-172. I'd have pushed you out the door. I had a 260 lb friend who would wait patiently until I got the plane trimmed and then slam his seat all the way back. He did it so fast that I didn't see it coming. This was the same guy who completely shut an engine down on me once. I'm sure it was payback for something, I just can't remember what. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message ... Tom Young wrote: Second that. The C150 I fly requires a lot less trim than the C172, to the point that I forget to use it sometimes. The 172 really doesn't let me forget. I ferried a C-172 with a coworker up to an engine shop a few years ago as one of a flight of two. When we got there, I got into the back of the other C-172. After we took off, I carefully noted when the pilot trimmed the aircraft, then leaned forward to engage the guys in the front in conversation. The pilot would fly along for a minute or two, then retrim. I'd lean back and wait a few minutes until he retrimmed yet again. Then I leaned forward to talk to the guys up front again.... making cracks about his apparent inability to hold altitude. Heh heh... I must have done it four or five times before the pilot caught on. G Lucky for me, there was no ejection seat in the C-172. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com About 3 months after I got my private certificate, I decided to go back for a little XC with the CFI who had actually been my CFI at the time of my checkride in order to just make sure I hadn't started to develop any early bad habits. As we were headed southeast from Phoenix, ATC called traffic overtaking us from our six o'clock and co-alt (ATC was not talking to that traffic...) Try as we might, we couldn't pick him up and eventually ATC suggests we descend. Right before I reach to retard the throttle and before I can push the nose down, my good old CFI racks the passenger seat back to the rear stop and just flops the seat flat trying to look up through the rear windows. We immediately gain about 150 feet which probably was not a good thing since we were pretty sure the conflicting traffic was above and behind us. Scared the hell out of me and I didn't let him hear the end of it all the way to our destination (and part of the way back, too...) Jay B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Making a pitch trim indicator for a Glasair | [email protected] | Home Built | 5 | September 13th 06 02:30 AM |
Cherokee Electric Pitch Trim | Jonathan Goodish | Owning | 4 | November 18th 04 02:43 AM |
A very basic question | Ramapriya | Piloting | 45 | November 9th 04 01:57 PM |
Ramifications of Cherokee Trim Jackcrew Failure | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 18 | June 9th 04 02:48 AM |
Lance vx. 6/300 | Bridgadoon | Owning | 27 | September 28th 03 08:20 PM |