![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The biggest radial engine topped out about 5000 cubic inches
and 4,000 horsepower in the late 1940. They were also about 3,000 to 5,000 pounds in weight with a prop installed. Turbine engines are much lighter in weight and have 15,000 to 75,000 eshp in thrust, jumbo airliners and freighter are only possible with the jet. "Don" wrote in message ... | Check out http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Qu...0/engine9.html | a real radial. I've seen these running with the top of a cylinder | blown off and the only way to tell it was BMEP was a little low and | you could see it on the ingnition analyzer. | | The biggest reason we all fly jets is without all those zillions of | reciprocating parts they are a hundred times more reliable. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Home Built Aircraft - Alternative Engines - Geo/Suzuki | OtisWinslow | Home Built | 1 | October 12th 05 02:55 PM |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
Engines and Reliability | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 13 | June 30th 04 03:27 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |