![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote in message news:734126e6bb945@uwe... Which is emblematic of their origins, and their original (and even today) purpose. I suspect you DO know what they were, don't you? Oh jesus, you're not going to start spouting "Red Scare" crap are you? Spare us. Communism (on a large scale) is dead. Crap? You mean the stuff the dug out of the Soviet archives? That crap? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
My problem with the ACLU is they promote themselves as defenders of the Bill of Rights. Yet they are very selective of what rights they defend. Actually, the ACLU has an extremely consistent record of unconditionally defending civil liberties, without respect to race, creed, color ... or popularity. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder writes: My problem with the ACLU is they promote themselves as defenders of the Bill of Rights. Yet they are very selective of what rights they defend. Actually, the ACLU has an extremely consistent record of unconditionally defending civil liberties, without respect to race, creed, color ... or popularity. From the ACLU web site: "Majority power is limited by the Constitution's Bill of Rights, which consists of the original ten amendments ratified in 1791, plus the three post-Civil War amendments (the 13th, 14th and 15th) and the 19th Amendment (women's suffrage), adopted in 1920." Yet never once have they defended the 2nd amendment. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 5, 9:06 am, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net
wrote: Mxsmanic wrote: Gig 601XL Builder writes: My problem with the ACLU is they promote themselves as defenders of the Bill of Rights. Yet they are very selective of what rights they defend. Actually, the ACLU has an extremely consistent record of unconditionally defending civil liberties, without respect to race, creed, color ... or popularity. From the ACLU web site: "Majority power is limited by the Constitution's Bill of Rights, which consists of the original ten amendments ratified in 1791, plus the three post-Civil War amendments (the 13th, 14th and 15th) and the 19th Amendment (women's suffrage), adopted in 1920." Yet never once have they defended the 2nd amendment. Of course not, they are the American Complete Liberals Union after all... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
Yet never once have they defended the 2nd amendment. Against what? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... "Majority power is limited by the Constitution's Bill of Rights, which consists of the original ten amendments ratified in 1791, plus the three post-Civil War amendments (the 13th, 14th and 15th) and the 19th Amendment (women's suffrage), adopted in 1920." Yet never once have they defended the 2nd amendment. That's interesting. On the other hand, they had a part in Brown v. Board of Education and bans on interracial marriage. I don't know about you, but most of the people I know including myself own all the guns they want; one friend owns a licensed BAR, another owns a Sten and an MP-40. Another guy, who owns Fairly Honest Don's Machine Gun Parlor, has an M-60 mounted on the back of an old surplus jeep. I prefer not to talk about my gun collection, but let's just say I haven't needed the ACLU and I've thrown a whole hell of a lot of 7.62x39 downrange on many occasions including those where law enforcement was also present. -c |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Mxsmanic wrote: Gig 601XL Builder writes: My problem with the ACLU is they promote themselves as defenders of the Bill of Rights. Yet they are very selective of what rights they defend. Actually, the ACLU has an extremely consistent record of unconditionally defending civil liberties, without respect to race, creed, color ... or popularity. From the ACLU web site: "Majority power is limited by the Constitution's Bill of Rights, which consists of the original ten amendments ratified in 1791, plus the three post-Civil War amendments (the 13th, 14th and 15th) and the 19th Amendment (women's suffrage), adopted in 1920." Yet never once have they defended the 2nd amendment. Or the 9th, 10th... Their take on the others is anything but consistent. See how often they've intervened when a conservative or libertarian, such as Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, Ward Connerly, etc., have been shut down, intimidated.... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Maher opined
Why not sue the company that made the diodes in the VOR beacons that the flights may have used, or the headset manufacturer too? What a pity that valuable court resources are consumed by the ACLU's bilge. Don't give them any ideas. -ash Cthulhu in 2007! Why wait for nature? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ash Wyllie" wrote in message ... Jim Maher opined Why not sue the company that made the diodes in the VOR beacons that the flights may have used, or the headset manufacturer too? What a pity that valuable court resources are consumed by the ACLU's bilge. Don't give them any ideas. They're already working overtime to come up with such daffyness. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Maher wrote:
This is rich. The [Anti] American Civil Liberties Union, also known for its staunch support of the North American Man-Boy Lovers Association (NAMBLA), just filed a suit of Boeing's Jeppesen subsidiary. The reason? The ACLU is accusing Jeppesen for providing flight services to the CIA, which Boeing "knew or should have known," was using for the purpose of "torturing" terrorists. Even assuming for the purpose of the argument that the CIA was actually torturing terrorists, why would Jeppesen be at fault? They merely provide navigation support and handling for air traffic control, fuel requirements, formalities, etc. for airplanes. Somehow ACLU wants to hold Jeppesen responsible for running a torture chamber too. Why not sue the company that made the diodes in the VOR beacons that the flights may have used, or the headset manufacturer too? What a pity that valuable court resources are consumed by the ACLU's bilge. http://charlotte.bizjournals.com/den...8/daily21.html Urban myth ... -- "Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool." —- Voltaire |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Zoom sues...again | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 9 | April 28th 05 01:11 PM |
Navy sues to get return of F3A-1 wreck | Mike Weeks | Military Aviation | 18 | March 30th 04 08:30 PM |
Navy sues to get return of F3A-1 wreck | Mike Weeks | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 28th 04 12:11 AM |
Jeppesen Flite Pro IFR lLight Simulator AND Jeppesen FlitePro ATC Communications Software on Ebay | Cecil E. Chapman | Products | 0 | January 14th 04 01:37 AM |